Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
Seahawks are no. 1 in points per plays margin at .290. Early in the season we will find teams off strong performances will be no. 1 but with few games to ave out these big performances this will not be sustained. After week 1 Packers were no. 1 at .374 then after week 2 it was Ravens at .400. Now it is Seahawks at .290. The more games played these strong performances even out so then a team could sustain they're level of play. .290 would very likely be the best all-time. Do we really believe this Seahawks team will be the best all-time ? 2007 Pats at 16-0 one of the greatest regular season teams was like .258 or similar to that. I doubt the 85 Bears were .290. So we know Seahawks are not sustainable these past couple of strong play games. But does not mean they will lose this week but I'd side more with them regressing some. They could still win by doing that but if they happen to have a bigger regression which is possible then they likely will lose. 1991 Redskins .46 Points per Play There's probably more. I just looked these two up because I knew they were exceptional. |
theclaw | 33 |
|
![]() |
Sam Darnold might be the 2025 MVP. |
PUSSYGALORE333 | 134 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by CaseyMcGehee:
This is more Kyler and MHJ being ass than it is Seattle being good. Nope. |
PUSSYGALORE333 | 134 |
|
![]() |
Dumb Ass Kenneth Walker. |
PUSSYGALORE333 | 134 |
|
![]() |
Seattle looks much sharper. |
PUSSYGALORE333 | 134 |
|
![]() |
Seahawks -1.5 over Cardinals Lions -10 over Browns Broncos -7/-120 over Bengals
|
Jimmy_Cats | 3 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by Ilovefootballs:
Quote Originally Posted by C-70Blues: Gambling and handicapping have been around for thousands of years. How long has AI been around? It's nothing more than the new shiny toy to play with. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been around for about 70 years. Our military uses it, as do all businesses, hospitals, and sports analysts. The greatest invention ever made by humans is AI. It's up to you whether or not you want to use it.
I'll stick with the wheel. |
Ilovefootballs | 50 |
|
![]() |
I played GB with Bills, and GB with Dolphins. I thought about TB, but decided on Bills -5.5, and Dolphins +17.5 with GB -1.5. Good luck. |
fts1409 | 13 |
|
![]() |
@ossnya10 You don't post for almost 2 years, and this is what you come up with? |
ossnya10 | 22 |
|
![]() |
replied to
Reddit AI System (42-2) Memphis-4.5 NCAAF & New England Pats+1.5 NFL
in Website Promotions Quote Originally Posted by ThePizzaman0:
A poster on Reddit documented has an AI system which is 42-2 on season NCAAF & NFL combined. The strongest NCAAF in system is Memphis-4.5 and strongest NFL is New England+1.5 I do not believe you. |
ThePizzaman0 | 14 |
|
![]() |
Jaguars |
Raidernator76 | 49 |
|
![]() |
@RayRayK The Lions are 7-0 SU and ATS following a loss over the last two seasons. I like them to bounce back too, but they sure looked bad in week 1. |
RayRayK | 9 |
|
![]() |
Mahomes is 12-2-1 as a dog. That's the best in the NFL for starting QBs. The Chiefs are 53-46 SU as a dog since 1967. That's also the best in the NFL by a wide margin. Just saying. |
sudshead | 20 |
|
![]() |
Jaguars +3.5 over Bengals - Jags looked good. Bengals looked like crap.
|
Jimmy_Cats | 1 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by IAMTEDDYKGB:
Eagles offensive line is unsettled. Eagles pass rush non existent. Not the same Eagles Team. I am an Eagles Fan. Line is where it should be. I agree. The Eagles are missing five defensive starters from last season. They looked kind of average vs Dallas. The line seems correct. |
sudshead | 20 |
|
![]() |
So many of you overreact to every little thing that happens. You've either written the game off in the 1st quarter, or you're counting your money. If some of you were coaching, you would have benched McCarthy before halftime. Now, after the game, Caleb sucks, he's not an NFL caliber QB. Anyone who didn't grab some live Vikings ML action at +300 or so, you should have. When you see a team completely dominated statistically in the first half, yet they are less than a TD behind, they are usually a damn good bet. |
brianx | 32 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by hkaces:
should never bet with rookie qb.. dumb No, what's dumb is making statements like you did in the first quarter! |
hkaces | 9 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by Greenandwhite23:
@Cooler999 I’ve yet to see someone hit cfb at a higher clip than me on this forum I've always thought of you as a loudmouth loser. |
Greenandwhite23 | 37 |
|
![]() |
Fake lines. |
TheNewUnderdog | 5 |
|
![]() |
@jdukes0004 I like 'em too. Their on a 9-5 run, and all losses are to a projected 4 seed or higher. They're a pretty tough out.
|
jdukes0004 | 6 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.