@jefff
@jefff
Actually from a pure "Raw" points perspective, Texas didn't win by DD on the road to a good ISU team, they won by four points. That may be something about my capping method you don't understand, not many do. They did lose their QB in the Houston game, Unfortunately, he doesn't play defense and Houston was having their way with that.
As far as the KState game and that they lost a 3 TD lead, and you will lay that on the back up QB that made errors ?..lol. Again, the QB doesn't play defense so you better lay the responsibility where it belongs.. on the "Texas defense", besides that games irrelevant..it was a home game and has absolutely nothing to do with any statistical pure points analysis where they play Monday, absolutely nothing.
Oh boy.. another Texas lost a 3TD lead against TCU. Yes, that was inexcusable, seems to be a common occurrence with the Texas defense. Now we get to the last 2 games, and because they were up big leads vs 2 of the worse teams defensively and cant score.. gee, they learned their lesson from the other games and didn't give up big leads or let their foot off the gas. How convenient, vs Texas Tech & Oklahoma St. The one game vs Texas Tech was @ home another irrelevant and the last team they just played a team with a crap QB and O-line and a defense that lost 3-45 to UCF. I can tell just by the way you laid all that out that your capping methods are flawed..with all due respect. I think Ive heard enough.
@jefff
Actually from a pure "Raw" points perspective, Texas didn't win by DD on the road to a good ISU team, they won by four points. That may be something about my capping method you don't understand, not many do. They did lose their QB in the Houston game, Unfortunately, he doesn't play defense and Houston was having their way with that.
As far as the KState game and that they lost a 3 TD lead, and you will lay that on the back up QB that made errors ?..lol. Again, the QB doesn't play defense so you better lay the responsibility where it belongs.. on the "Texas defense", besides that games irrelevant..it was a home game and has absolutely nothing to do with any statistical pure points analysis where they play Monday, absolutely nothing.
Oh boy.. another Texas lost a 3TD lead against TCU. Yes, that was inexcusable, seems to be a common occurrence with the Texas defense. Now we get to the last 2 games, and because they were up big leads vs 2 of the worse teams defensively and cant score.. gee, they learned their lesson from the other games and didn't give up big leads or let their foot off the gas. How convenient, vs Texas Tech & Oklahoma St. The one game vs Texas Tech was @ home another irrelevant and the last team they just played a team with a crap QB and O-line and a defense that lost 3-45 to UCF. I can tell just by the way you laid all that out that your capping methods are flawed..with all due respect. I think Ive heard enough.
LOVE Washington and the points. Worthy's health is truly the wildcard of all wildcards. It's heresy to say it but Ewers does not impress me and I have zero faith in him when the chips are down. Penix worlds better IMHO. No Brooks either.......gimme the Huskies fairly large.
LOVE Washington and the points. Worthy's health is truly the wildcard of all wildcards. It's heresy to say it but Ewers does not impress me and I have zero faith in him when the chips are down. Penix worlds better IMHO. No Brooks either.......gimme the Huskies fairly large.
Relative performance on "Pure" points
Washinton gave up 1.94 points per drive against teams scoring2.43 points per drive. For a 79.9% performance
Texas gave up 1.45 points per drive to teams scoring 2.39 points per drive for a relative performance of 60.4%.
Washington played offenses with a composite indexes of 53.56
Texas played tplayed offenses with a composite indexes of 53.10
Dead even
Texas Defense has performance that is better.
Washington gave up over 400 yards on defense 5 times all season, including 495 to Stanford. Stanford is AWFUL Utah gained 6.7 YPP
Texas gave up over 400 yards once, to Oklahoma.
SOS is almost identical.
Texas has the better defense, by far.
Relative performance on "Pure" points
Washinton gave up 1.94 points per drive against teams scoring2.43 points per drive. For a 79.9% performance
Texas gave up 1.45 points per drive to teams scoring 2.39 points per drive for a relative performance of 60.4%.
Washington played offenses with a composite indexes of 53.56
Texas played tplayed offenses with a composite indexes of 53.10
Dead even
Texas Defense has performance that is better.
Washington gave up over 400 yards on defense 5 times all season, including 495 to Stanford. Stanford is AWFUL Utah gained 6.7 YPP
Texas gave up over 400 yards once, to Oklahoma.
SOS is almost identical.
Texas has the better defense, by far.
@TJZags598
Thats not the pure points I'm referring to. Yes, they have the better defense. However, their defense on the road is mediocre @ 22-23 pure points washington and there 38 pure poits per game offense will be able to take advantage ..and of course Texas will get there points as well 34-31 Washington
@TJZags598
Thats not the pure points I'm referring to. Yes, they have the better defense. However, their defense on the road is mediocre @ 22-23 pure points washington and there 38 pure poits per game offense will be able to take advantage ..and of course Texas will get there points as well 34-31 Washington
Say whatever you want but we all know Wash Defense is their biggest weakness. Hell, TexTech almost beat Oregon, the team that goes toe to toe with Washington. Pac12 defense suck this year.
Say whatever you want but we all know Wash Defense is their biggest weakness. Hell, TexTech almost beat Oregon, the team that goes toe to toe with Washington. Pac12 defense suck this year.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.