| Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Quote Originally Posted by TDHCentral:
123-90-6 (+1.55 u) Jacksonville St. (+2) (-129) .13 u I assume the + is a typo? -2? |
TDHCentral | 11 |
|
|
@coversvanzack |
CCK | 43 |
|
|
Not a Canuck.... But thanks.
|
CCK | 43 |
|
|
I am fine, thanks for asking. I slowed down posting here for several reasons. First is the tech and commitment of Covers to invest in the forum. This place hasn't changed in 20 years - type something and hit submit and it disappears, cant post tables, cant post graphics, cant follow people, cant mute people.... All the stuff that is the difference between modern day social media and 2000 vintage chat rooms. Covers wont invest, they dont care, so why should I. I can do more and explain more on twitter. Second... I do a lot of audio "podcast" types of things now - and I do give out football and soccer plays - just not like I did here for 25 years. I was regularly beating the Saturday night widely available lines for NFL for years, all posted at the same time - which is silly and not really relevant for real world betting. Who bets everything at the same time on a Saturday night, for mature NFL sides, and keeps a record? Nobody. And last... It just wasnt fun anymore. I post for fun. I never made a dime anywhere. Never was a tout, never an affiliate. It wasnt fun anymore. I am out here working my ass off to get close to zero vig - using exchanges - but the vig police wanted me to put -110 next to everything without understanding that for me a bet at -3 -100 is not a bet at -3 -110, or a definite stake reduction. So how do I do that? I had a bad year last year, I think I lost 35 units in the end or something (against mature NFL lines). But I won for the 7 years before that, and had a 3 year stretch of winning 75+ units per year. But in the end - I dont care what you losers do - I could spoonfeed you winners and you would still lose money because you have no discipline, no staking methods, and you arent line/price sensitive. So what is the point? Things change and evolve in life. I am happy doing my charity work - that is my focus now - and I am able to do that better on twitter. I will be hosting a World Cup daily show this summer. I can do more there. GL |
CCK | 43 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by MudPhud3:
He didn't go tout and he still bets the NFL. He's just not posting because of the trolling and misinformation evident in this thread. ^^^^^
|
CCK | 43 |
|
|
Hello
|
CCK | 43 |
|
|
@JimmyGape Same side, and same reason I dont post here anymore. Has happened to me 1 too many times, along with all of the other tech nonsense here.
|
JimmyGape | 26 |
|
|
replied to
Thursday Night Football Analysis and Write Up. We're back to leaving no stones unturned.
in NFL Betting GL JG.
|
JimmyGape | 46 |
|
|
The Texans OLine is terrible. They had 2 good weeks against terrible teams (Texans and Ravens), that hid the fact that they are in the bottom 3 in the NFL. Add to it that Stroud is poor under pressure - and that they are forced in to passing situations - and they dont have a chance in these types of games. When they can run and play with the lead, they are fine - but if you can identify games (like this one) where the OLine will be under big pressure - it is a bet against. One of the most predictable teams in the NFL IMO.
|
frankbullitt | 4 |
|
|
I am holding my nose and betting the Falcons tonight, for a lot of the reasons you are. GL JG.
|
JimmyGape | 58 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by LordS:
@vanzack BOL Vanzack. I'm live right now on X ;)
|
unplucked_gem | 19 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by LordS:
@vanzack Hi Vanzack. You said that you have 3 U play. What;s your play? KC -3.5? -3.25 Chiefs |
unplucked_gem | 19 |
|
|
I lost 6 entries this week between the Rams and Bills. I am out.
|
unplucked_gem | 19 |
|
|
@unplucked_gem Any concerns about the Lions being BOTH a Christmas and Thanksgiving team?
|
unplucked_gem | 26 |
|
|
If covers technology wasnt so bad I could post a flow chart with percentages. It is ALWAYS the right move to go for 2 when you score a td to go down 8 from 14 (4th qtr).
|
Ppkay | 29 |
|
|
@unplucked_gem That would be justice.
|
unplucked_gem | 39 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem:
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack: O/U on Seahawks this week: 43% Not planning on being on them, the over would be exciting and I'd be cool with that. Going to be hard for me to avoid. I have 6 entries in Circa, and at least some will be on the Seahawks. Maybe all.
|
unplucked_gem | 39 |
|
|
O/U on Seahawks this week: 43%
|
unplucked_gem | 39 |
|
|
GL Vanzack
|
JamesTee | 19 |
|
|
Jaguars
|
Raidernator76 | 49 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.