| Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Hoyasaxa:
Bro you gotta be more flexible in this league, it’s more week to week than ever.. very few teams ever stop trying except the clown Dolphins the first half ( which deservedly so will cost them their season) I’ll give it to you, you’re probably the best Monday morning QB on the forums. If you have some thoughts to share, please do so BEFORE the result is in hand. |
theclaw | 65 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by slamspurs:
Actually I knew Washington would lose. Denver ML was -700 when they got to Washington's 10 yard line. Washington was +500, and Denver hadn't even scored yet. If you followed live lines you would know what's going to happen in the story of the NFL.
well then surely you’re a multi-millionaire via NFL sports betting at this point? |
ActionMagnet | 24 |
|
|
Missed the 14, titans line is down to 12. |
theclaw | 66 |
|
|
Damn. Sure didn’t see 0-6 coming. I don’t understand betting first half and then the same bet for the full game. You’re just double dipping. Pick one or the other. |
ThePizzaman0 | 80 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by MakerBayfield:
Very hard to believe sharp money is backing Florida State. They're 0-7 on the road in conference games in past 2 seasons. And, Castellanos is such a Jekyll & Hyde quarterback. They should do to FLA St what they did to Georgia Tech
I agree. Not a single sharp I know is on Fl St. |
HooAlum | 413 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Brewmeister:
Clemson fell to +2 so I bought it back to +3 for 3 units. BOL everyone here's to the start of another solid weekend...
ah hell, just take the ML at that point and make some +money. |
HooAlum | 413 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by KeyMaster:
It appears to me that the Za Man is copying and pasting picks/writeups from "Another" Service, looks identical.......but they charge money, Za Man is gracioulsy posting here for Free.............
Ding! Ding! Ding! |
ThePizzaman0 | 81 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by jefff:
Quote Originally Posted by incognegro: @RexR Quote Originally Posted by RexR: I never really saw saw this as a good fit. How did they expect Kelly to recruit in the SEC? Especially with him as a Yank and all of his coaching jobs being in the Midwest. And how soon do these athletic boosters stop paying these outrageous buyouts? It seems like it's beyond a bubble. Guys, these payments aren’t “buyouts.” BK’s contract ran through 2031. LSU fired him, which means they broke their end of the deal. Because of that, they owe him a settlement. His payout is actually less than what they would’ve had to pay if he stayed for the full contract. I don’t get how people keep mischaracterize these termination issues with all schools and coaches and calling them a “buyout.” They are merely paying the contract that both parties agreed to (and in most cases far less than what the actual contract was worth). if they are paying him to leave and it's less than what the actual contract would have paid out...then it's a buyout. "A contract buyout is ."
Call it what you want to, I guess. Fact remains a contract was signed, and LSU broke it (Along with Penn st, Florida, etc.) and now they have to pay. So for some to say something as asinine as "until these universities quit with these monster buyouts, blah, blah blah," it would be worse. The school could have to pay out the entirety of the contract that was signed. So be thankful for the "buyout" clauses. |
blowoutgm | 21 |
|
|
@RexR
Quote Originally Posted by RexR:
I never really saw saw this as a good fit. How did they expect Kelly to recruit in the SEC? Especially with him as a Yank and all of his coaching jobs being in the Midwest. And how soon do these athletic boosters stop paying these outrageous buyouts? It seems like it's beyond a bubble.
Guys, these payments aren’t “buyouts.” BK’s contract ran through 2031. LSU fired him, which means they broke their end of the deal. Because of that, they owe him a settlement. His payout is actually less than what they would’ve had to pay if he stayed for the full contract. I don’t get how people keep mischaracterize these termination issues with all schools and coaches and calling them a “buyout.” They are merely paying the contract that both parties agreed to (and in most cases far less than what the actual contract was worth). |
blowoutgm | 21 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by AGK:
League capper now a tout and charges for his daily picks. not anymore. he closed up shop before the start of last season saying he was going to take a break and come back this year. He hasn’t come back and his website is gone. No trace of him for a year or so.
|
NinjaNight | 41 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
Quote Originally Posted by incognegro: @theclaw Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: I'll have some info on KC'S monstrous -4.8 expected wins coming soon. If you don't think KC will regress they already have not once but twice in the Mahomes era and in the process produced the 2 worst records of the Mahomes era. And now they have by far their largest negative expected wins. We'll take a look at how a larger expected win negative or positive effects the number of games each team regressed. KC win UNDER 11.5 games (-210) --- 2.1 units to win 1 unit Don't be surprised if KC loses more close games after week 1 then they did all last season which was 0. And they just might be 0-2 after 2 weeks. Is this line a typo? under 11.5 is currently around -130, or am I missing something? Thanks for pointing that out ................... I was thinking taking a 3 game regression would be under 12.5 that was the -210 which was a great price based on what I see out there. 72% probability they regress by 3 games based on past history. Then I changed my mind and took a 4 game regression or under 11.5, I did get -135. But was still thinking about the -210 when I posted that pick. Thanks again
no problem brother, you’re one of the best. Best wishes this season! |
theclaw | 175 |
|
|
@theclaw
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
I'll have some info on KC'S monstrous -4.8 expected wins coming soon. If you don't think KC will regress they already have not once but twice in the Mahomes era and in the process produced the 2 worst records of the Mahomes era. And now they have by far their largest negative expected wins. We'll take a look at how a larger expected win negative or positive effects the number of games each team regressed. KC win UNDER 11.5 games (-210) --- 2.1 units to win 1 unit Don't be surprised if KC loses more close games after week 1 then they did all last season which was 0. And they just might be 0-2 after 2 weeks. Is this line a typo? under 11.5 is currently around -130, or am I missing something? |
theclaw | 175 |
|
|
You must be new here. Same ole song and dance every year. |
PizzaBoyRick | 10 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
Quote Originally Posted by incognegro: Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Quote Originally Posted by incognegro: Are there any bets yet? I haven’t seen any. I'll be on all 4 close win plays for half a unit not to be ignorant, but I don’t know what this means. Read post #28 thank you buddy. GL! |
theclaw | 218 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
Quote Originally Posted by incognegro: Are there any bets yet? I haven’t seen any. I'll be on all 4 close win plays for half a unit
not to be ignorant, but I don’t know what this means. |
theclaw | 218 |
|
|
Are there any bets yet? I haven’t seen any. |
theclaw | 218 |
|
|
Anything official today? |
theclaw | 46 |
|
|
Only the saints pending, correct? No official bets for today? |
theclaw | 78 |
|
|
@jimmydafreak Well, I’ll be damned. The man has returned…..sort of. |
richiepicks | 5 |
|
|
Can you list all of your official plays in one post? I am confused as to whether some are plays or if you are merely suggesting for other reasons. It gets confusing with the long threads. Thanks! |
theclaw | 57 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.