| Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Last week: 1-0 YTD: 13-9 This week: Cleveland +10.5 (v Buff) NY Jets +4.5 (@ NO) There's a third game that fits the parameters that I will not take: Las Vegas +14 @ Houston. Maybe if it got to +17.5 and then the Texans roster got the measles an hour later. |
garbagetime | 2 |
|
|
I predicted you would win with Indy, and you did. Pretty typical that the one pick that I didn’t like would be the only one to win. |
theclaw | 45 |
|
|
Colts are 13.5 right now, and it occurs to me that Seattle are relatively close to a "twin peaks" fade. It's supposed to come into play when a team is off consecutive games of scoring 30 and giving up fewer than 10. Seahawks beat Minnesota 26-0 and Atlanta 37-9 the last two. When it's a pure twin peaks angle, the ATS record is something like 75% if not a divisional matchup. Don't know what happens when you water down the requirements. |
theclaw | 45 |
|
|
I took Washington 2.5 (-105). |
garbagetime | 14 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by GMoneyGTown:
can someone tell me why KC continues to be favored in these games when clearly they are not that good this year.
Yes, because odds reflect public attitudes, not "who is good" or "who is better, and by how much." The public will support KC for a year after they're not that good. |
GMoneyGTown | 3 |
|
|
Posted this in its own thread, but worth seeing the Westgate top 5 picks. They're off their best week last time (4-1), but they're still underwater, 31-38 (favorites 21-22, dogs 10-16). They like two dogs this week, one of them Miami (vs Pitt).
BUF 232 -1 By the way, KC was #6 with 176 picks, Denver #7 with 170. |
theclaw | 45 |
|
|
BUF 232 -1 Top 5 went 4-1 last week, best of the season. YTD, however, they're 31-38. Favorites 21-22, dogs 10-16 |
garbagetime | 2 |
|
|
The one that you're certain to win is the Colts, because it's the only one I can't imagine taking. The Colts are so done, and Seattle can't possibly be looking ahead here. Seattle's D can contain the Colts, and play so much better at home anyway. Just can't imagine Rivers at 44 and away for as long as he has been, will be up to NFL speed. |
theclaw | 45 |
|
|
Good luck, claw |
theclaw | 45 |
|
|
Well, teams do rest their starters, but the backups definitely have something to play for. Although, you know, Broncos 38, Chiefs 0 in week 18 last year. |
garbagetime | 14 |
|
|
YTD 12-9 Commanders +2.5 (at NY Giants) are theoretically a play. The look-ahead line was -2.5, and Zach Ertz's season-ending injury is only part of the reason. I don't think the dropoff to Mariota justifies that kind of swing. I'm going to wait on this one. As I was crunching my numbers, I was really struck by something we all know but don't give a lot of thought to...how slight the margin is between winning and losing when you bet the NFL. A 12-9 record is 57%; I've gone 10-6 this year with this strategy (62%). I was initially inclined to not play Washington here because the situation in my database is really marginal. Teams in their situation, as dogs on the road after getting waxed on the road, are around .500, although pretty good in December. When you focus closer (only dogs below a field goal, for example), you end up with records like 6-5. A 6-5 record is 54.5%! It's kind of nuts. Do teams pack it in? Tank? I think it's obvious they don't. Professional athletes always have something to play for. You're talking about a matchup here where both teams' seasons went south pretty quickly. Giants swept their preseason games in huge fashion and then dropped straight into the toilet. Commanders have now lost 8 straight. It's not like this particular loss hurts more for a team that went to the NFC championship game last year. |
garbagetime | 14 |
|
|
YTD 12-9 after one of the easiest wins you or I will ever see. Next week, Commanders are theoretically a play. However, I won't play them as an away favorite, and the look-ahead was -2.5 at the Giants. |
garbagetime | 6 |
|
|
@theclaw I got -1 this morning, but it's -2.5 now. As soon as Westgate picks were released I jumped. |
theclaw | 65 |
|
|
GB 210 -6.5 YTD the top five picks are 27-37. Faves 19-22, dogs 8-15 Jags and Texans both on the list, but watch out Packers. |
theclaw | 65 |
|
|
Vikings ML -105 Seeing Washington on the Westgate list cinched it for me. Hopefully JJ can stop sucking. |
garbagetime | 6 |
|
|
GB 210 -6.5 YTD the top five picks are 27-37. Faves 19-22, dogs 8-15 |
garbagetime | 3 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by DogbiteWilliams:
TC, you can check the Covers consensus by going to the top of this page and clicking on Sports/NFL/Scores and Matchups. Currently CHI is at 61%; that's a huge public dog of which public handicappers have been leery. HOU is currently at 49%; not quite a public dog, but a much higher % than most dogs get. I'm on TEN and they are at 28%. I usually look at oddsshark but they're relatively close in the odds you see. The rule of thumb has been to oppose teams getting 80% or more on the spread. This week that's Denver and Seattle. I always found it made sense to avoid those teams when in a confidence pool, because public confidence is the kiss of death. |
theclaw | 65 |
|
|
Colts are -1, -1.5 and -2 at my three books. |
theclaw | 65 |
|
|
Be well, claw |
theclaw | 65 |
|
|
Minnesota is now -1, which would not be a play. I'm kind of surprised by the 3-point move in their direction. |
garbagetime | 6 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.