Steelers -3 (-125) over Dolphins --- .63 units to win .5 units
Zona +10 (-120) over Texans --- .6 units to win .5 units
both plays are very near BF plays with fades on Dolphins and Texans.
I can make a case to play both these although they don't fit perfectly. I won't count then on the BF official record but worth a small play.
Also interesting is Steelers like 8th in pts per plays margin while the Dolphins well back like 15th or such.
Steelers have a great shot to win the division, I think they get it done here VS Dolphins.
Based on the pts per plays margin after 6 weeks Steelers were high ranked and did deserve a play on them to win the division although I didn't particularly believe in them at the time but the method may just prove me wrong.
Steelers -3 (-125) over Dolphins --- .63 units to win .5 units
Zona +10 (-120) over Texans --- .6 units to win .5 units
both plays are very near BF plays with fades on Dolphins and Texans.
I can make a case to play both these although they don't fit perfectly. I won't count then on the BF official record but worth a small play.
Also interesting is Steelers like 8th in pts per plays margin while the Dolphins well back like 15th or such.
Steelers have a great shot to win the division, I think they get it done here VS Dolphins.
Based on the pts per plays margin after 6 weeks Steelers were high ranked and did deserve a play on them to win the division although I didn't particularly believe in them at the time but the method may just prove me wrong.
And Seahawks have a short week looking to playing the Rams Thursday night.
Classic look-ahead spot here although Colts could be in a tough spot with their QB.
But with 2 methods fading the Seahawks and a look-ahead spot on a short week the Colts looking in such tough shape might be perfect for Seahawks to over-look them.
And Seahawks have a short week looking to playing the Rams Thursday night.
Classic look-ahead spot here although Colts could be in a tough spot with their QB.
But with 2 methods fading the Seahawks and a look-ahead spot on a short week the Colts looking in such tough shape might be perfect for Seahawks to over-look them.
My other system ..............10-7 My new BF II method ............. Both have a fade on Seahawks Colts +14 (-120) over Seahawks --- 1.2 units I'll put half a unit on each method. And Seahawks have a short week looking to playing the Rams Thursday night. Classic look-ahead spot here although Colts could be in a tough spot with their QB. But with 2 methods fading the Seahawks and a look-ahead spot on a short week the Colts looking in such tough shape might be perfect for Seahawks to over-look them. Play has to be Colts or no play.
Jeff Sagarin makes SEA -6.48 at home hosting IND. I don't think Daniel Jones is worth 7 to 7.5 points more than whatever QB(s) IND will use.
My other system ..............10-7 My new BF II method ............. Both have a fade on Seahawks Colts +14 (-120) over Seahawks --- 1.2 units I'll put half a unit on each method. And Seahawks have a short week looking to playing the Rams Thursday night. Classic look-ahead spot here although Colts could be in a tough spot with their QB. But with 2 methods fading the Seahawks and a look-ahead spot on a short week the Colts looking in such tough shape might be perfect for Seahawks to over-look them. Play has to be Colts or no play.
Jeff Sagarin makes SEA -6.48 at home hosting IND. I don't think Daniel Jones is worth 7 to 7.5 points more than whatever QB(s) IND will use.
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: My other system ..............10-7 My new BF II method ............. Both have a fade on Seahawks Colts +14 (-120) over Seahawks --- 1.2 units I'll put half a unit on each method. And Seahawks have a short week looking to playing the Rams Thursday night. Classic look-ahead spot here although Colts could be in a tough spot with their QB. But with 2 methods fading the Seahawks and a look-ahead spot on a short week the Colts looking in such tough shape might be perfect for Seahawks to over-look them. Play has to be Colts or no play. Jeff Sagarin makes SEA -6.48 at home hosting IND. I don't think Daniel Jones is worth 7 to 7.5 points more than whatever QB(s) IND will use. I haven't acted, but I like your IND play, TC.
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: My other system ..............10-7 My new BF II method ............. Both have a fade on Seahawks Colts +14 (-120) over Seahawks --- 1.2 units I'll put half a unit on each method. And Seahawks have a short week looking to playing the Rams Thursday night. Classic look-ahead spot here although Colts could be in a tough spot with their QB. But with 2 methods fading the Seahawks and a look-ahead spot on a short week the Colts looking in such tough shape might be perfect for Seahawks to over-look them. Play has to be Colts or no play. Jeff Sagarin makes SEA -6.48 at home hosting IND. I don't think Daniel Jones is worth 7 to 7.5 points more than whatever QB(s) IND will use. I haven't acted, but I like your IND play, TC.
Jags not only in 2cd game of a BF fade but a re-qualify as a BF fade.
Off 3 big wins over past 4 games, 35-6, 25-3, 36-19 and coming off beating the Colts a divisional opp tied for division lead with the Jags at the time.
A very good spot to fade the Jags here.
Brady Cook maybe a little shaky at QB, a little concerning for sure. But I'll belive in the method and this spot.
Cook did finish his career 3rd in the SEC history in QB Passer rating behind only Jaxson Dart and Jayden Daniels.
That looks pretty good when comparing those QB's success in the NFL.
Jags not only in 2cd game of a BF fade but a re-qualify as a BF fade.
Off 3 big wins over past 4 games, 35-6, 25-3, 36-19 and coming off beating the Colts a divisional opp tied for division lead with the Jags at the time.
A very good spot to fade the Jags here.
Brady Cook maybe a little shaky at QB, a little concerning for sure. But I'll belive in the method and this spot.
Cook did finish his career 3rd in the SEC history in QB Passer rating behind only Jaxson Dart and Jayden Daniels.
That looks pretty good when comparing those QB's success in the NFL.
Looking at games this weekend giving 3 pts for home field ..........
Packers -1.29 over Broncos
Rams -6.84 over Lions
Pats -2.27 over Bills
All pretty close to actual lines.
Although I have Pats favored VS a small dog. I suspect Pats having won the 1st game it's tough to beat a good opp twice in the same year and the added experience of the Bills in these spots VS Pats 1st time being there with this team books making Pats the dog.
Did Pats open -1 ? Not sure but I think I saw that on you tube.
Looking at games this weekend giving 3 pts for home field ..........
Packers -1.29 over Broncos
Rams -6.84 over Lions
Pats -2.27 over Bills
All pretty close to actual lines.
Although I have Pats favored VS a small dog. I suspect Pats having won the 1st game it's tough to beat a good opp twice in the same year and the added experience of the Bills in these spots VS Pats 1st time being there with this team books making Pats the dog.
Did Pats open -1 ? Not sure but I think I saw that on you tube.
Jags rate only 2.9 after 3 big wins in past 4 games, they are in a regression spot which means they are not as good as that rating and now a huge favorite because of Brady Cook. I suppose maybe somewhat justified .
Cook needs to play TO free and Jets should be fine. 1 TO or so but start to stackTO's and obviously Jets could get routed.
Jags rate only 2.9 after 3 big wins in past 4 games, they are in a regression spot which means they are not as good as that rating and now a huge favorite because of Brady Cook. I suppose maybe somewhat justified .
Cook needs to play TO free and Jets should be fine. 1 TO or so but start to stackTO's and obviously Jets could get routed.
They could be in a regression spot though even though it doesn't fit perfectly it is still the same principles that apply to regression.
they could be worth a small play to win the AFC or maybe better just back them each game in the playoffs.
Considering they got off to a slow start and not having one of the best records but are rated the best team. this team could prove to be the surprise team of the playoffs.
They could be in a regression spot though even though it doesn't fit perfectly it is still the same principles that apply to regression.
they could be worth a small play to win the AFC or maybe better just back them each game in the playoffs.
Considering they got off to a slow start and not having one of the best records but are rated the best team. this team could prove to be the surprise team of the playoffs.
Ok, took some abuse here last week for ridiculing the Colts pick after the game started..I apologize and will NOT do that again. But even before Jones went out, they were DOA mainly considering their current play, huge loss of Gardner,complete mental fear of playing Jax for a decade, etc..
This week, I like all Claw's plays, see traps in all cases..I live in the mental intangibles, key player match-ups, motivation, bad coaching..all 3 big favs listed could easily take the game for granted, their opponent will not. I like Claw's systems, I just feel occasionally, there's danger when you have my mental criteria sticking out..The Colts even blew a week 18 game in Jax a few years ago as a 17 POINT FAVORITE..with a playoff berth on the line...ain't no systems that can lead you to that
Ok, took some abuse here last week for ridiculing the Colts pick after the game started..I apologize and will NOT do that again. But even before Jones went out, they were DOA mainly considering their current play, huge loss of Gardner,complete mental fear of playing Jax for a decade, etc..
This week, I like all Claw's plays, see traps in all cases..I live in the mental intangibles, key player match-ups, motivation, bad coaching..all 3 big favs listed could easily take the game for granted, their opponent will not. I like Claw's systems, I just feel occasionally, there's danger when you have my mental criteria sticking out..The Colts even blew a week 18 game in Jax a few years ago as a 17 POINT FAVORITE..with a playoff berth on the line...ain't no systems that can lead you to that
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.