Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Throwing my hat into the "record" ring 0-0 + 0.0U KC ML +130 3U KC +2.5 -102 3U
|
barneybeans | 8 |
|
![]() |
Good to see you back Nerd! I'm on the Bucs today.
BOL Bro |
AFNfootballnerd | 27 |
|
![]() |
Off Da Bears this week? BOL Sac! |
undermysac | 22 |
|
![]() |
Thanks Mac!
|
barneybeans | 8 |
|
![]() |
Not playing this because I ain't got the scratch to burn So, this means it's a winner
|
barneybeans | 8 |
|
![]() |
Why take KC - the best bet I am not making today
BAL offense is dangerous but volatile and at time inconsistent, especially with Lamar Jackson’s dual-threat ability and he's got Derrick Henry, so a threat rushing and passing BUT BUT BUT Finally, why KC: The BAL D has vulnerabilities, especially vs the run and they are letting up big plays. Message to KC's offense: "It's week 4, time to wake up!" Public and sharp squares are on BAL today. IMNSO
If I were a betting man I'd be 5U ea on KC today, ML and +2.5
|
barneybeans | 8 |
|
![]() |
OWO, yet another maniac on the NYG!
Today's smoke is Quai D'Orsay 52, going with a Glenmorangie Nectar D'Or
BOL OWO
|
oldwiseone | 20 |
|
![]() |
Not sure what you did either, so it must be a frame job. Bro, what cell you in and I'll send you a cake with a file baked in |
lopez021130 | 19 |
|
![]() |
Cancun has a team?
Good Morning Gentlemen! |
p_66 | 99 |
|
![]() |
The "recent posts" is the most usable feature of this site, 2nd to the search function that was disabled about 10 years ago. Being able to use both is paramount, although we are now used to not being able to search Covers (a feature of every forum since 1995) - at least bring back the Recent Posts. Thank you. |
Flynt | 15 |
|
![]() |
Big Mac Attack!
KC -2.5 is my POD (that I am not betting) And TB is my team, played them small. Glad we're on the same side?
But betting the NYG? Now that's down right deplorable!
Knock 'em dead
|
Macwestie1 | 73 |
|
![]() |
@RUM151 Great job by the way, you're rockin'
|
RUM151 | 30 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by RUM151: Another perspective:
I worked at WWTS in Antigua years ago as a odds adjuster, I have a lot of respect for the people who put out the lines, its why moving the lines at a book is tricky, your basing it on money coming in, but you also have to respect the line that came out, lines are based on public perception and are there to try and get even money on both sides, and books hate when scores come out to exactly where the lines were, teasers kill them on that because all teasers win just about , 6 pt teasers all win
A lot of people think the whole point of a sportsbook is to balance the action. The perception is that the house wants the exact same amount of money bet on both sides of a spread so they can just pocket the juice and never sweat a game. That’s sort of true for the neighborhood bookie who doesn’t have a lot of cash to float — he really can’t afford too much exposure to one game. His job is basically like a broker, matching buyers and sellers, not actually taking a position. But when you’re talking about the big shops with plenty of money behind them? Different story. They don’t need a perfect 50/50 split. They just need enough money coming in on both sides.
Meanwhile, only $5,500 to win $5,000 comes in on the dog If the underdog wins: The book keeps the $11k from losing favorite bets They pay out $5k to the dog bettors That’s a $6,000 profit. If the favorite wins: The book keeps the $5,500 from the losing dog bets They owe $10k to the favorite backers That’s a $4,500 loss. So basically, the house is risking $4,500 to win $6,000. They only need to “win” about 43% of the time to break even. Compare that to you and me, laying $110 to win $100 — the book is really only laying about $75 to win $100 (somebody check that math, please) Put another way: if there’s twice as much money on one side as the other, the sportsbook is sitting on +133 odds no matter what. For us to clear $6,000, we’d have to risk $6,600. The house? They only put $4,500 at risk. That’s why the big books don’t panic if the action leans heavy one way — the math is still in their favor
Lastly, dumb bettors after winning, will bet it all back, so sooner or later they're broke because of poor money management
|
RUM151 | 30 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by RUM151: If you do a little research, the final score only 19% of the time comes within 3 points in either direction(+/- 6 point swing) of the spread (open or close I don't remember, have not done the analysis in a long time) which is why 6 point teasers are still on the board.
I worked at WWTS in Antigua years ago as a odds adjuster, I have a lot of respect for the people who put out the lines, its why moving the lines at a book is tricky, your basing it on money coming in, but you also have to respect the line that came out, lines are based on public perception and are there to try and get even money on both sides, and books hate when scores come out to exactly where the lines were, teasers kill them on that because all teasers win just about , 6 pt teasers all win
|
RUM151 | 30 |
|
![]() |
Why take KC is the best bet I am not making today
Shrimp offense is dangerous but volatile and at time inconsistent, especially with Lamar Jackson’s dual-threat ability and he's got Derrick Henry, so a threat rushing and passing BUT BUT BUT Finally, why KC: The Shrimp D has vulnerabilities, especially vs the run and they are letting up big plays. Message to KC's offense: "It's week 4, time to wake up! Public and sharp squares are on BAL today. IMNSO
|
ABooksNightmare | 127 |
|
![]() |
Gentlemen, and I use that term loosely - actually the word gentlemen doesn't even belong in this thread, but we can dream damnit, of a future with no overseas games clouding up a perfectly sunny Sunday in the north east of the USA...
Can't study, no time for sports analysis, or watching games and reading over stats, but that shouldn't deter any degenerate from making a few blind wagers. Last NFL and this season I am up to very small straight wager or two and then a normal 1U bet on a super duper teaser = which is ridiculous alternate lines in my favor parlay between 3-7 teams - not really a teaser, me throwing alternate lines, crossing over 3, 7, 10, 14 in a super Wong parlay. Today my straight wagers are BAL is a trap and I am falling for it hook like and sinker. "KC is not the same KC, can't find their bearing, blah, blah, blah" but I'm only betting chump change these days. Serious money? I'd be betting the 5U ranch on KC today. But these days NFL is just for fun. The big parlay "Wong Teaser" TB +14.5
Good to see you guys
|
ABooksNightmare | 127 |
|
![]() |
Big Mac Attack!
Nice work, buddy, lookin' to see who you like today
|
Macwestie1 | 37 |
|
![]() |
Great job, knowing when to quit is more important then knowing when to play.
|
fubah2 | 3487 |
|
![]() |
Good Goin' Scorp
|
KingScorpio | 11 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by KC_4_LIFE: true dat!
It’s a very top heavy sport right now because of NIL/Transfer portal. Right now it’s the Wild West and as long as there’s zero regulation the rich will continue to get richer. Personally I would like to see NIL become contractual with 2-4 year terms put in place. If a player chooses to transfer and break their contract then they’ll be forced to sit out a year like they use to. The only thing that should void a contract is going to the NBA/professional ranks. Something needs to be done.
Transfer portal ruined so much. Tourney is kind boring and predictable. Speaking from a non betting perspective.
Almost would rather watch Chloe Kitts and SC on the women's tourney. Not joking.
|
GMAN2100 | 26 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.