Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Dam seen this before... Its over
|
Digitalkarma | 94 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by jerseyj24:
Fantasy football purposes. There we go now something that makes more sense. Like its okay to say what you think it is then to sound silly justifying what it is not. As somebody that actually watches the games it was just something you couldn't help but notice simply bc it never happens betting or not |
Kaname484 | 16 |
|
![]() |
@helmstetter21 I was clearly only asking one game where that ever happened and you guys trying to justify that decision to score there is just as dumb as them going for it. I had JD under 1.5 passing TD's so it didn't affect my bet at all but watching the game couldn't help notice why go for it unless it was to get JD a TD stat |
Kaname484 | 16 |
|
![]() |
After what the Texans just did to the Lamarless Ravens its hard to judge that win for KC as being significant. If Lamar finished the game then maybe |
JimmyGape | 13 |
|
![]() |
Also what if the throw also gets picked and returned for a TD? Why just not run it? |
Kaname484 | 16 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by ArtSchlichterJr:
You get kicked blocked and returned for a TD issue.. By throwing it you tell QB if not there throw it away and leave it deep in their territory.. Hey there just were a couple of kicks blocked and returned for TDs.. You answered your own question when was the last time someone was 90 yds away and scored 10 in 1 minute.. Last week for the blocked FG's and td return.. I'm confused at which game you are referring too where a team had the opportunity to go up 13 but FG got blocked returned for a TD and ended up losing the game in the last 60 secs? If that was a real event how often does something like that actually occur |
Kaname484 | 16 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by helmstetter21:
13 and 10 are nearly same with needing two scores. If don't get the 4th down then SD has to go 93 yards. If go up 13, then kickoff with chance to start need midfield or worst. Just analytics Its actually not the same bc in one scenario you'd need a TD and FG and the other you'd need 2 TD's in 60 secs. When was the last team to score 2 TD's in the last min of a game |
Kaname484 | 16 |
|
![]() |
I remember in sports everything had a reason of why even if it didn't make sense |
Kaname484 | 16 |
|
![]() |
No answers means everyone is just as clueless as me |
Kaname484 | 16 |
|
![]() |
Don't forget about Miami who was up 17-0 to the worst team in the league and blew it. They were my last leg of a massive parlay |
Brooklyncapper | 89 |
|
![]() |
The game was sealed even without kicking the FG which they had the opportunity too as well but its like they had to have that TD there |
Kaname484 | 16 |
|
![]() |
@shadowmagic808 Right Wash should be blowing them out |
nuyencac | 9 |
|
![]() |
I have SF gm -28, live -34, -40, -49 as well live -35 1st half |
Ctownkb55 | 31 |
|
![]() |
9ers look better with Mac. Thinking a 27-21 SF win. I can see them playing very conservative in the 4th if leading after 3 |
TDHCentral | 10 |
|
![]() |
They caught a huge break that inning could have got ugly and for under backers |
tech65 | 3 |
|
![]() |
@JFelty Their hitting just not when it counts |
YELAWOLF | 16 |
|
![]() |
Det has been the better hitting team this series just not efficient wanted to take Cle stayed away not knowing if Det actually turned hits into runs too unpredictable |
YELAWOLF | 16 |
|
![]() |
Judge putting the team on his back |
LVTruck | 6 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by sportmatic:
Good call had yanks 1st 5 And ur right about the loaded bases theory happens since 2020 when I saw it i knew it was over for yanks but good thing I had the 1st 5 lol |
CJL1989 | 12 |
|
![]() |
Have them 1st 5 saw it was 2-1 on ESPN then the run was taken back |
Mrgohard3 | 22 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.