Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
@StumpTownStu Okay, then I'll pivot to make a remark about your first post in this thread then. Thank you, sweet cheeks. |
PayMeHardRock | 24 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu: @iConsciousness Everything I write is grammatically sound, sweet cheeks. The lack of an Oxford comma, a "serial comma, is for effect. So that each item has increasingly emphasis. I wasn't simply listing racial groups. I didn't go beyond the title of this thread (which is what I was referring to) prior to my post. |
PayMeHardRock | 24 |
|
![]() |
The fact that this info is above the comprehension of most people on here. |
PayMeHardRock | 24 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare:
@iConsciousness I luv dat shit right der....the serial comma...this is way above most here icon
|
PayMeHardRock | 24 |
|
![]() |
Have you heard of the Oxford comma? |
PayMeHardRock | 24 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by iConsciousness: GL, Cyrax.I'm on Detroit Lions TT o23.5 at -120. ![]() 3-0 on my "unofficial plays." I'm bound to go 0-3 when I flip that script to "official." ![]() |
ABooksNightmare | 130 |
|
![]() |
Get 'em, Hank. |
Cranky_Hank | 17 |
|
![]() |
GL on your play, DK. |
Digitalkarma | 39 |
|
![]() |
GL, Cyrax. |
ABooksNightmare | 130 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by iConsciousness:
Chargers -2.5 Bears TT o23.5
The Bears play was too easy. The Chargers could've been just as easy, but playing without 3 of your starting 5 Olinemen made it difficult. Cheers nonetheless
|
ABooksNightmare | 130 |
|
![]() |
Najee Harris and Mekhi Becton (RG) are out. Pipkins' (RT) ankle heavily taped up. This should get interesting here on out. |
ABooksNightmare | 130 |
|
![]() |
Non-official plays, win or lose. I want to get a good feel for teams and I think Week 4 is a good start for that. I'll start tracking next week. |
ABooksNightmare | 130 |
|
![]() |
I'm not touching the total on this game, ABN. I'm usually on the wrong side of 'em. But my mind was definitely saying "over." I think the Chargers win due to their offense. If I'm the Raiders, though, I'd run, run, run. Daiyan Henley is active, but not sure how healthy he is. Maybe he'll be just as good as Becton was last week (playing with a stomach bug). May the better team win. For everyone else, may it be an exciting one. |
ABooksNightmare | 141 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by LAGameofInches: Next play, also one I really do love and another FH where I have done incredibly well (except for the Ravens total yesterday in the FH): OVER 23 FH (LAC/LV)...BIG PLAY!!!: I've eyed this all week and I think the first half is a really solid way to go here. I truly believe that the Las Vegas offense is far better than they have been in years and sure, we might mock Geno Smith, but he's an extremely capable NFL QB much different than the guys they have called QB over the past handful of years. I also believe the LV defense is NOT very good and that will mean the Chargers should put some points up. These games typically go over in LV (5 of the past 6 have gone over the number in the Raiders home stadium) and if it's a close game, it could get tight towards the end of it. I don't want to praying for points at that point when, imo, there will be a plethora of them scored in the first half. Would be great to get the sweep, anything less will be treading water and I'm trying my best to get away from that. Again, not to sound repetitive, but, as always, tail or fade, good luck to all... The Raiders will be starting Alex Cappa in place of JPJ at RG tonight. "Cappa allowed the most total pressures of any guard in the league last season and had the worst pass blocking efficiency rating of any starting guard.: The Raiders might have to run the ball. Chargers could be down 2 LBers (Denzel Perryman for sure, as he went on IR, and quite possibly Daiyan Henley, their best ILBer.) It would make sense for the Raiders to run the ball repeatedly to wear down the Chargers D and mix in some Geno play action. I think the Chargers win this, and I think they'll be able to put up points. I just can't tell if the Chargers hurting at the 2nd level on Defense will allow the Raiders to score more too, or will the lack of Brock Bowers and a worse Oline than last week spell doom for them on offense. |
LAGameofInches | 9 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare: Quote Originally Posted by iConsciousness: What I'm reading from X regarding the Chargers-Raiders game tonight.The Chargers, already down Denzel Perryman (one of their best run-stuffing LBers) may also be out Daiyan Henley (their green dot on the field and arguably their best LBer, period). He apparently came down with some kind of illness. Not sure if it's a stomach bug or bad Las Vegas buffet food. While I expect the Chargers offense to carry over from last week, they might be a little shaky on defense.Another thing I'm reading is that Brock Bowers will be listed as active, but will be mainly used as a decoy. So don't expect much from him, at all. Should be a low-to-zero snap count.I'm wondering if this will go above the total.take the under...Raiders are banged up and as you said the Chargers missing key components....run run run is what I am expecting and plenty of punts....Chargers on a Brazillian butt lift hangover as well and da Raiders are just hungover period...the wildcards here are truly the scrambling ability of each QB in this game Yeah, I know the Raiders are starting Alex Cappa in place of JPG at RG tonight. "Cappa allowed the most total pressures of any guard in the last season and has the worst pass blocking efficiency rating of any starting guard." The Raiders O-line will be facing a near non-existent pass rush though, so something's gotta give. I suspect you may be right if the game resorts to a ground-and-pound by the Raiders. They may not have Bowers' elite blocking and receiving services (really, he can do it all). But I think the Chargers will still put up points on their end. I can't predict if Harbaugh is going to flip to the other side of the offensive playbook and run, when Pete Carroll thinks it's going to be another aerial attack game, or continue from last week. I see a juicy line on Bovada, which defaults to the Chargers TT o23.5 at -165. (I wish they offered o24 with less juice.) Three TDs and a FG seems doable. ![]() |
ABooksNightmare | 141 |
|
![]() |
What I'm reading from X regarding the Chargers-Raiders game tonight. |
ABooksNightmare | 141 |
|
![]() |
A fun parlay that should hit.
Steelers ML + Aaron Rodgers o175 passing yards -125 |
ABooksNightmare | 141 |
|
![]() |
|
Biscuiteater1 | 30 |
|
![]() |
YTD: 0-0 |
iConsciousness | 2 |
|
![]() |
It's still early, but wanted to do this anyway. |
trainwreck66 | 110 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.