To Tiny Tim (and the other pea-brained bigots and you know who you are),
Where there's smoke there's fire?
For every 'story' stereotyping blacks, there is an equal and opposite story from blacks stereotyping whites. Of course, whites being the majority, will have more stories of black 'laziness, incompetence, crime' in the end. You have a poor understanding of proportion. You don't take the TOTAL tally. Whites will always win that one in this country since they outnumber all races. You take the proportion to the total and you'll find that percentage wise, there are as many blacks complaining about whites as there are vice versa in proportion to the total respective population. Your math grade - F -
Now i'd pick apart your responses with the precision of a surgeon's scalpel but their are so many personal narratives/anecdotes (your drinking problem/Will god-damn Smith?

,blacks you've allegedly made millionaires), it's largely pointless and will turn this thread into a three-ring circus.
I will address something being harped on here and in the other thread and some of the overall themes you and the social degenerates here believe.
For the millionth time, NO ONE IS FORCED to commit crimes in the 21st century (well then again, given the modern day sex trade industry, young women, largely minorities, are forced to engage in prostitution).
That being said, crime is a FUNCTION of relegation to the inner city (i.e. undesirable living conditions and areas) and being denied equal access to employment and eduction and housing and health care (and and and I could type about injustice until this keyboard had smoke coming out of it). There is little recourse. Is it right or moral? No. Do I condone or support rape? No. (but your white ancestors not only supported it, but preyed upon underage black slaves and Indians who were under their gun barrel, therefore history provides a white paved road to vile behavior).
'Crime' as it's defined by federal, state, local government will naturally evolve because of barriers to entry into prosperous society.
And as a philosophical segue, what is crime? The drug trade is largely demonized because blacks are the final distributors. The government doesn't seek out the provider (whites through south american outlets for the most part), the wholesaler (again, whites) but go after the person who makes the final transaction....the young black male on a street corner or project corridor in an inner city.
Why? Because this is nature's natural course. Attack the easiest and most helpless form of prey. The one with the fewest resources to attain adequate legal representation (if kapono wanted to live a life of true worth, he might think about defending inner city blacks when they have grievances) or even know their rights when they could very well "give themselves up" for court records as a baton is pushed into their ass.
Police quotas are bulked up and more overtime and bonuses are provided when arrest and conviction stats rise through kangaroo courts. The entire 'war on drugs' is extremely lucrative for governments who now have justified tax dollar channels and police who can now remove the coffee and donut imagery...and for the mind-set of adjacent white communities that they and their children are now 'safe' from dangerous drug-slinging blacks.
A male lion will rip a baby cub limb from limb so he can take over a pride. Even when he attacks the male leader, it is an older more frail one, never taking on an opponent of his own size or strength.
Historically, whites have done the same to blacks. They've beaten them physically and more importantly psychologically for centuries (and millennia worldwide).
I will use an animal territory comparison for no other purpose but to transmit these ideas through your steel plated cranium. Unfortunately, the white legacy of racism has used animal imagery in comparison to blacks and hispanics DIRECTLY to dehumanize so such a comparison on my part is immediately suspect. No surprise. Whites have been muting ideas contradictory to their cause for all of humanity...and coming up with ones to degrade anyone other than their own.
When humans settle in new territories, they displace the native species of that land. The result? Animal attacks on humans and vice versa, deer and rodent carcasses on the side of newly paved roads, and for some time, animal infringement on places of human residence.
Why did this occur? Because humans believe it is their divine right to expand, steal, utilize, and eventually ravage lands until all resources are depleted. This is at the expense of the animal population and their habitat. Judeo-Christian philosophy and the 'stewards of the earth' biblical reference in Genesis is the driving force behind this crusade (yes, ONE Bible verse is largely responsible for 'white expansionism' on BOTH animals AND humans....how weak minded

).
Anyhow, in no uncertain terms, blacks and hispanics are largely RELEGATED to inner cities and there is historical proof of this through a term you are most certainly not familiar with, institutional racism. They do not enjoy the spoils of 'white expansionism' because whites will not allow them access to those tools, resources and the spoils that accompany them.
Despite your chuckles, ask the MAJORITY of blacks (and most certainly NOT a meager TWO black millionaires you might know...they don't speak for a race in the least) about getting bank loans for homes or small businesses, employment processes where they are rejected because of a native african sounding names (Tyreke, Jamal, etc.) , and exclusionary avenues to higher education.