JM V1 V2 V3 MLB system Lets post all MLB plays here.

Anyone on San Diego tonight?

Playing SD...but as more of an LAD to lose.

hey nole im on SD +1. 5 tonight. I have been playing these systems for years now, glad i found this . some other people to discuss the bets with.

jag - do you have any suggestions or advice on how you play these systems?

interesting post on found at another forum
--------------------------------------------------------
Did a little backtesting yesterday on Morrison's system...everyone seems to know how last year went, but beyond that it's a mystery...so I started with '08 and went back through '05...I only did the AL East...here's what I came up with:

OFFICIAL PLAYS
'08 - 6 A wins, 3 B wins, and 2 Losses
'07 - 5 A wins, 4 B wins, and 1 Loss
'06 - 0 A wins, 1 B win, and 1 Loss
'05 - 3 A wins, 3 B wins

Total = 14 A, 11 B, and 4 L's = 25-4

UNOFFICIAL PLAYS
'08 - 2 A wins, 2 B wins, and 1 Loss
'07 - 4 A wins, 4 B wins, 1 C win, and 1 Loss
'06 - 7 A wins, 4 B wins, and 3 C wins
'05 - 6 A wins, 1 B win, and 2 C wins

Total = 19 A, 11 B, 6 C, and 2 L's = 36-2


And here are the losses if you wanna check em out for yourself:

OFFICIAL
'08 - TB (35-22) vs Bos (35-25), 6/3-5
'08 - Bos (61-45) vs LAA (64-40), 7/28-30
'07 - Bal (58-66) vs Min (63-63), 8/23-25
'06 - Bal (14-16) vs Bos (16-12), 5/5-7

UNOFFICIAL
'08 - Bal, 9/22-23
'07 - TB (38-60) vs Bal (44-54), 7/24-26


After seeing this many losses in going through ONE division, i've seen enough...it really doesn't make any sense to me to waste any more time backtesting...this is simply a SHIT system.

Now you can argue that some of these losses may have been filtered out by the RPI differential, but I think you'd just be acting naive...the Twins are currently 24-14 and own an RPI of .521...the following mediocre teams would qualify for an official play against the Twins if the series started today:

Florida - 20-19 - .519
Cincy - 22-16 - .516
Boston - 19-20 - .516
Colorado - 19-19 - .516
LAA - 18-22 - .513
Wash - 20-19 - .512
Mets - 19-20 - .507


As far as I know, there is no way to go back and find an RPI rating for a specific date in history...but from the ratings I gave you above, i'm sure you can see that MOST (if not ALL) of the official losses are indeed losses...AND...you can even make a case for the unofficial TB loss qualifying as an OFFICIAL loss.

Anyway...I hope this helps to open everyone's eyes...my eyes were certainly closed through all of last year and apparently I was VERY lucky...but history and percentages DO NOT lie...and since the system went without a loss last year, this can only mean that it's due for a double shot of losses this year.

So you've been warned...if you continue to follow this shitty system, you WILL lose...I guarantee it...and the only person to blame will be YOU...so hopefully you've got an unlimited bankroll...cuz you're gonna need it.

Nice A win on San Diego last night. I took the ML, b/c the juice was too damn high on the RL.

As far as the other post about sytstem losses, learn the Lab. line method of money mngmt.

Also, do some of your own thinking and handicapping.

LAD streak ends at 9 gms. Nice play on SD. Looks like nothing until 5/24.

Monday's card is busy!

We Got 3 official and one unofficial:

Boston, Chicago Whitesox, Toronto are official.

Pittsburgh is unofficial.

GL everyone.

yup lots of plays today good luck all

Also an unnofficial 2 game series tomorrow on Detroit (@Seattle).

Is the Boston game official tonight? Bc the system says not to bet agianst the top two teams when it comes to RPI and the rays are number one

JM sent it out as a play

F-yeah. Nice night last night, finally. Much needed 3 A wins.

Only A game loss was the unofficial pirates game.

Today starts a 2 gamer with Detoit. I am putting a little on it myself.

 

Yes...That was nice.

But, not sure why on DET...Im not seeing DET swept by SEA last month 4/16 to 4/18. Lost 2 of 3.

However, TEX did sweep KC on 5/6 to 5/9 (4) and they meet in KC for a 2 gamer. RPI TEX .501 and KC .475....U/O.

And I am thinking PIT, although U/O w/ CIN, should get a win in this series. The U/O's have won a game as well...

Its only SF (and ironically OAK just swept them as well) who hurt us and they were an O play.

Must be a mistake that Det-Sea is added to the list, not really where that came from 

Yeah...OK, violin player. Have a nice thread.

I thought Seattle swept Detroit last time they played. If so, this series is only a 2 gamer, which is why I said it was an optional play.

If Detroit was not swept, my bad.

Seattle did win one of 3 back in April. Mt bad guys. Sorry for the confusion...

https://sahlsa.dk/junk/JM_MLB_schedule_2010.xls

Schedule bump.

And the Mets sweep the Phils. All shut-outs too. Ouch.

Added:

Added:

All the plays early in the week are unofficial... until we get to boston vs bal on friday... quite week

Unofficial A winner on Arizona.

Anyone taking the O's this series? I am not touching them. They are this year's Nationals...