Here NBA V2.0

V2 rules don't say that the 2nd half of a 6 game road trip is eligible or ineligible.  In V1 the 2nd half is ineligible .  I haven't seen anyone actual post the email from JM for Chicago, which makes me think he's not playing it......

Is Dallas a system 2.0 bet tonight???

@ Houston @ Indiana @ Cleveland

Quote Originally Posted by usakangy:

Someone please help me understand why New Jersey (0-13, 0-7 SU on the road) is a JM system play tonight and Sacramento from last year (0-0, 0-0 SU on the road at the time) was not..... Sacramento ended up 0-3 to start last season.  Worst the Nets can do is only 0-10. 

Now New Jersey is not the worst team ATS on the road this year.  They are 2-4-1 ATS there.  But I do not think that alone justifies making this a play.  I have captured that web page for future...ahem... investigation... should New Jersey end up losing this series and he tries to sugarcoat his record by not counting it. 

Boy, you need to stop with the emails about how much money we'd all have betting your 210-0 run in NBA and MLB with a $100 bankroll, and start putting consistency into your system plays!! 

Because JM aka Tan is a liar.  He sent emails to take Sac at the beginning of the season then after the C bet loss stated it was not a play because of their record.  He couldn't blemish his record so he retracted the whole series. What an ass.

Yes it is definitely V2: 3 game roadtrip and at least 1 team is cross conference.  V2 pdf does not ask the order of the cross conference team.  There are no questionable caveats like 6 game road trip or overlapping a V1 play.  This might be the 1st undisputed V2

By no means sticking up for JM. I know this is a v2.0 thread.

I have v1.0 rules which state

"The only exception is to never bet on a team that is either the best or worst on the road.  If your team has the worst road record in the league, then you should pass on that series due to the higher risks involved.  Likewise, if your team has the best road record,in the league, then vegas woul;d often set the line too high, so its best to pass on that series as well."

unless there is a team with a worse record than 0-7 (before yesterday's loss) than NJ shouldn't have been a play.

Just another one of those contravercial games for JM.

Best of Luck.

I never purchased v2.0 but doesn't this system call for at least 2 from the opposite conference not just 1 oppposite conf team. Just trying to set the "rules" straight.

On the 1st page in this thread this is stated.

Best of Luck

Sorrry   Correction V2: 2 teams must be cross confernce, one team same conference

Its NHL V2 that at least 1 team must be cross conference

Let the debate begin: Pho is a V2 play starting Fri 27th but if V2 didn't exist Pho is a V1 play Sunday 29th.  Double dip???

27th Pho @ Min

29th Pho @ Tor

1st   Pho @ NY

2nd   Pho @Cle

I would take Pho on the 27th and call that an A game and chase till it wins. If it wins on the A, i am personally gonna stop there.

Also, is anyone confused by the "gift" of updates that JM sent last week? I am talking about the NBA update where the team going on the road trip now has to have lost the last home game they had and by at least 3 points before they hit the road for it to be a play. Isn't that what it said?

Is he just trying to make things confusing with the hopes that people will get frustrated and just pay for the premium service of day-before posted plays?

Is anyone using this new criteria?