Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Virginia +6.5 Vandy +13 ML Parlay: Texas/UConn |
DrStrangelove | 12 |
|
![]() |
|
Fuse | 40 |
|
![]() |
Cincinnati ML ULM +12 Florida St +4.5 Boise St +21.5 Memphis/Tulsa under 56 UCLA/Penn St under 49 TCU/Colorado under 58
|
DrStrangelove | 12 |
|
![]() |
Okie St is a disaster right now. Zona should be able to cover that number if they aren't looking ahead...BOL Fubah |
fubah2 | 4333 |
|
![]() |
I agree with you on Texas A&M. I should have got it early when it was 14. I lean the under in the TTU game. But I haven't played it. Good luck LH. |
LonghornHoosier | 19 |
|
![]() |
replied to
***Macwesties * Fri. * Sat. * Oct. 03, * 04, 2025 * NCAAF * Week #6 * College Football Plays***
in College Football BOL Mac |
Macwestie1 | 21 |
|
![]() |
Colorado St +6 (-119) Delaware ML |
DrStrangelove | 12 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by Yanasaur: That North Texas coach was an asshat for needlessly going for 2 at the end of the game to make it 14 and cover by one...Looked like something Kiffin would do.
@DrStrangelove Thanks. I got a bad line on CSU. I bet the open at 4.5 and ml. I expected it to come down, didnt anticipate steam on SDSU. Still like the play though. I couldnt believe we didnt cover that N. Texas game. Gross |
DrStrangelove | 12 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by Yanasaur: S. Alabama has let me down too. Last week was a terrible beat with North Texas. But that's the way this season has gone. My main concern with S. Bama is the injuries to their secondary. I'm still thinking this one over. I'll probably end up playing CSU tonight. It looks like they're starting to get some action. Line now down to 6. I was hoping for a 7. SDST doesn't have a good enough offense to run away with the game. Good luck!
Ive been on S. Bama 3 weeks in a row. Cant go to it again. Theyve disappointed me. I am on CSU. Virginia sounds good too, but not betting it. I'm surprised the line is this high, I was expecting 3.5. Good luck strange |
DrStrangelove | 12 |
|
![]() |
15-31
Hopefully some of these running dogs will start kicking in for week 6. The PRD's this week are: New Mexico(D), CSU, KSU(D), Virginia, Vandy, ULM, Sparty, S. Alabama, FSU(H), Nevada.....(D) Better Defense (H) Home Team
Tonight looks like NM might be the strongest play. Still considering CSU. Also lean Delaware.
New Mexico +3 (-120) |
DrStrangelove | 12 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by Skydog1842: So far it's a weird year for the running dogs. It looks like one of those seasons where I'll have to sit back and wait for these teams to gel with all of these new players. I hate to blame NIL for all of this, but I can't really put a finger on why these PRD's aren't doing better. I'll probably go light this week and be a little more selective. Maybe in a couple weeks things will start to clear up.
I had yesterday 5-8, so the stats haven't completely meshed. I've seen Dr. Strangelove post winners with this formula year after year, but the stats usually get "right" after league play begins. All these early cupcakes skew the model. |
DrStrangelove | 10 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by EzWinnahs: I'm having trouble accessing my past posts on this site. I'll try to get it straightened out this week.
Sir, how do you go from 7-13 last week, to 11-18 this week when you had 8 losses last week alone? |
DrStrangelove | 10 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by MrFreedo: All of the plays today are potential running dogs. Keeping my fingers crossed that they start hitting in this 5th week. Good luck!
bol running dawgs next week?? |
DrStrangelove | 10 |
|
![]() |
11-18
Bowling Green +8 Arkansas +4.5 South Alabama +13 Northern Illinois +2 Cal +6 Auburn +7 LSU +3 (-121) Hawaii +7 (-120) MTSU +7.5 (-120) Arizona +6 (-122) Missouri St +4 Bama +3 (-120) Kentucky +6
|
DrStrangelove | 10 |
|
![]() |
11-18
Army +4 (running dog) |
DrStrangelove | 1 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69: Gundy's better teams were mostly top 30/35 recruiting programs. But I think the most important thing right now is NIL, which seems to have flown right by this OSU program. You've got to be able to fill the key positions like QB, which OSU doesn't seem to have this season. I'm not sure exactly how Gundy feels about NIL. Everybody assumes he hates it. He may have a negative reaction to it because the school won't supply the big money to go after these players. But if Texas Tech can do it, OSU should be able to do it. I'll be curious to see what Gundy's next move is. If he still likes coaching like he says, then he'll probably go to another school in some capacity. But it also wouldn't surprise me if he goes the way of his brother Cale and gets into media.
Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove: Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69: Gundy had a 66% win rate (both registered season and bowls).....only had 2 losing seasons in 20 years.....Hell, he was the Big 12 coach of the year in 2023.....He was a good motivator and a good guy/coach..... The "I'm a man! I'm 40!" speech from 2007 is still one of the best "coach had players back" moments..... Conference realignment, NIL/portal crap made it hard to get guy to come and/or stay....Ok St isn't alone in this issue..... So please stop with the "no big program is gonna want him".....not sure why a big school wouldn't want a guy with 20+ years experience that has always been a winner and a players coach.....Sadly, the bigger coaching jobs are about 'what have you done lately?' And the last two years haven't been kind to Gundy. But I do like his offensive system. He stuck to his guns with that system for 20 years and was very successful. But you still need the players to operate it. Being ranked 50th, 58th and 59th in recruiting rankings the last three years isn't going to cut it.. Do you think Oklahoma St is gonna be a top 25 recruiting school? If you get the right kids, 3 and 4 stars often out perform 5 star recruits.....thats where the coaching comes in. Of course last 2 years was the introduction of NIL and the portal....so a weird transition period has been happening.....Clemson and Ok St are 2 of the bugger schools that thought they could stick to the old ways and build from within....maybe in a few years it will even out, but now you gotta open your pocketbook for the best players.....the difference is small position by position....but added over 22 guys makes a big difference..... |
DrStrangelove | 17 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69: Sadly, the bigger coaching jobs are about 'what have you done lately?' And the last two years haven't been kind to Gundy. But I do like his offensive system. He stuck to his guns with that system for 20 years and was very successful. But you still need the players to operate it. Being ranked 50th, 58th and 59th in recruiting rankings the last three years isn't going to cut it..
Gundy had a 66% win rate (both registered season and bowls).....only had 2 losing seasons in 20 years.....Hell, he was the Big 12 coach of the year in 2023.....He was a good motivator and a good guy/coach..... The "I'm a man! I'm 40!" speech from 2007 is still one of the best "coach had players back" moments..... Conference realignment, NIL/portal crap made it hard to get guy to come and/or stay....Ok St isn't alone in this issue..... So please stop with the "no big program is gonna want him".....not sure why a big school wouldn't want a guy with 20+ years experience that has always been a winner and a players coach..... |
DrStrangelove | 17 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by monkeybutt: Gundy's salary wasn't really the issue. T. Boone Pickens dying was the issue. The donations dried up after that. They need another sugar daddy. Supposedly they have one...I'm sure a few others will get on board now that Gundy is gone.
@DrStrangelove cost them 15 mil to fire him tho. they have been wanting him gone for a few years. sucks he had to go out like that, but he needed to be gone for sure. |
DrStrangelove | 17 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by monkeybutt: It would have to be a smaller school. I don't think a P4 school would hire him right now. I'm a little surprised, but not shocked that they picked this time to fire him. They usually give a long tenured coach the benefit of the doubt. But in today's game, money talks, and they have a bigtime OSU donor lined up and ready to give over $10 million to the school. But only if Gundy is no longer the coach.
@DrStrangelove imo smaller schools should be lining up to hire him. he is a really good recruiter and coach, and has always been great at getting the best out of lower level talent. he didn't like the nil stuff, and was too slow to come around. i could see him thriving at a smaller school without the pressure to win every game. he could possibly get back to the younger version of himself that was so aggressive and had big balls. the last several years at ostate he has had baby balls. |
DrStrangelove | 17 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by corvette59: Yep, he's got a lot of 'fu*k you' money. Curious to see if he stays in the game and moves on to another school....or if anybody would hire him.
@ddoback YOU LEFT OUT HE IS A RICH MAN WITHOUT A JOB |
DrStrangelove | 17 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.