@UNIMAN
Don't forget stealing luggage while cross dressing.
More like; A male stealing female's luggage to bolster his cross dressing.
More like; A male stealing female's luggage to bolster his cross dressing.
![]()
![]()
![]()
I would say that magas are following a cult leader because they lost their minds, but the true fact is that magas never had a mind to begin with. Some of the weakest minds in our country belong to maga folks.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I would say that magas are following a cult leader because they lost their minds, but the true fact is that magas never had a mind to begin with. Some of the weakest minds in our country belong to maga folks.![]()
The cult verbiage used to describe people here is almost indescernable from some of the online postings of Crooks. Sadly in this case we lost the ability to examine his mind.
The cult verbiage used to describe people here is almost indescernable from some of the online postings of Crooks. Sadly in this case we lost the ability to examine his mind.
Its funny how magas love to post videos of online you tube trash to try and make their point. Its down right comical to think that some loser sitting in their moms basement making a video means there is actual fact and truth to the video.
Plucky keep posting dumb ass videos, cause i never watch the trash and am pretty sure all the posters here that cant stand trump, click on your bait garbage.
Please continue to enjoy your life wasting your time looking online looking for nutty videos.![]()
Its funny how magas love to post videos of online you tube trash to try and make their point. Its down right comical to think that some loser sitting in their moms basement making a video means there is actual fact and truth to the video.
Plucky keep posting dumb ass videos, cause i never watch the trash and am pretty sure all the posters here that cant stand trump, click on your bait garbage.
Please continue to enjoy your life wasting your time looking online looking for nutty videos.![]()
Your post ads nothing to the dialog and serves only as another failed attempt to mock / insult those that voted for the president.
That to me seems more a waste of time then a well cited and straightforward presentation of information being kept from the public.
Only a stunted mindless cult member would blindly object to hearing facts which is sad.
![]()
Your post ads nothing to the dialog and serves only as another failed attempt to mock / insult those that voted for the president.
That to me seems more a waste of time then a well cited and straightforward presentation of information being kept from the public.
Only a stunted mindless cult member would blindly object to hearing facts which is sad.
![]()
Might be a good idea to try and avoid interaction if you two are unable to be reasonable and respectful. It is visible that you two and a few others have it out for the other and if you want to post that way then do it in the penalty box if you must. I dont see why the need to make things personal but some of you seem unable to control yourselves.
Might be a good idea to try and avoid interaction if you two are unable to be reasonable and respectful. It is visible that you two and a few others have it out for the other and if you want to post that way then do it in the penalty box if you must. I dont see why the need to make things personal but some of you seem unable to control yourselves.
Do with me what you will but I do not go on the offensive with general insults about voting tendencies and party affiliations. He does.
Nor do I enter threads with minimal contributions on the actual subject matter presented. He does. While one side may disagree with my view on the subject, a view is offered.
We can pull your own words about responding when called out and that's all that is happening here. With a more respectful response on my end then his.
I will cry fair mod shtick here as if he was ever afforded time to think about his actions, perhaps we'd find ourselves in a different place. But his behavior is continually reinforced.
Do with me what you will but I do not go on the offensive with general insults about voting tendencies and party affiliations. He does.
Nor do I enter threads with minimal contributions on the actual subject matter presented. He does. While one side may disagree with my view on the subject, a view is offered.
We can pull your own words about responding when called out and that's all that is happening here. With a more respectful response on my end then his.
I will cry fair mod shtick here as if he was ever afforded time to think about his actions, perhaps we'd find ourselves in a different place. But his behavior is continually reinforced.
@unplucked_gem
Your fair mod schtick is old and false and you need more to the argument than to always fall back on that. I see your digs on the guy stuff that is unnecessary and provocations that are unnecessary. If you want to do the HE DOES narrative then you have to be completely spotless yourself and you are NOT spotless.
Again...just quit engaging with him and if he or ANY member leads you to making combative petty retorts then do not make that reply and just avoid the situation entirely.
We have user reports and keep in mind that we view them and look at the entire situation before taking action and that is the way it works on this site, please use that when you feel rules are being broken and we can investigate.
Just for the record (again) none of the members you are at odds with report the other side, we do not have PMs for members to complain so that is not happening and if anything one group in this forum in general does a great job at avoiding conflict and the other does a lousy job and with that the incidences of boxings and bannings are correlative.
@unplucked_gem
Your fair mod schtick is old and false and you need more to the argument than to always fall back on that. I see your digs on the guy stuff that is unnecessary and provocations that are unnecessary. If you want to do the HE DOES narrative then you have to be completely spotless yourself and you are NOT spotless.
Again...just quit engaging with him and if he or ANY member leads you to making combative petty retorts then do not make that reply and just avoid the situation entirely.
We have user reports and keep in mind that we view them and look at the entire situation before taking action and that is the way it works on this site, please use that when you feel rules are being broken and we can investigate.
Just for the record (again) none of the members you are at odds with report the other side, we do not have PMs for members to complain so that is not happening and if anything one group in this forum in general does a great job at avoiding conflict and the other does a lousy job and with that the incidences of boxings and bannings are correlative.
Gem, Stu, Mugg, Abooks, Slim, Jesron, Soup, Spock, Pot.......
The observation has merit and many respectfully disagree.
As mentioned in the other thread, you're clearly set in your views and inflexible to others which is fine. The bleed over to moderation duties remains the longstanding objective concern by many
Gem, Stu, Mugg, Abooks, Slim, Jesron, Soup, Spock, Pot.......
The observation has merit and many respectfully disagree.
As mentioned in the other thread, you're clearly set in your views and inflexible to others which is fine. The bleed over to moderation duties remains the longstanding objective concern by many
@unplucked_gem
You ignore correlation because it fits your narrative. The list of members you put there are all complicit in the exact way I described above. Its easier to blame someone that to own your actions and words, you seem very quick to lean on diversion and excuses and shade your own words and actions then complain when those words and actions have recourse.
You prove my point perfectly, those who you list are complainers and also those breaking the framework and rules of the site and especially in this forum where the rules have to be even more strict and enforced due to the nature of the content. It is also interesting how the names on that list get personal and really crappy with regards to how they express their disagreement and some cannot help themselves and wonder why the rules are enforced.
@unplucked_gem
You ignore correlation because it fits your narrative. The list of members you put there are all complicit in the exact way I described above. Its easier to blame someone that to own your actions and words, you seem very quick to lean on diversion and excuses and shade your own words and actions then complain when those words and actions have recourse.
You prove my point perfectly, those who you list are complainers and also those breaking the framework and rules of the site and especially in this forum where the rules have to be even more strict and enforced due to the nature of the content. It is also interesting how the names on that list get personal and really crappy with regards to how they express their disagreement and some cannot help themselves and wonder why the rules are enforced.
![]()
![]()
"It is also interesting how the names on that list get personal and really crappy"
The inquisitive Gem would ask why? Then come back to the record of literally 100% to 0%.
Even the Epstein vote didn't land on 100%.
![]()
![]()
"It is also interesting how the names on that list get personal and really crappy"
The inquisitive Gem would ask why? Then come back to the record of literally 100% to 0%.
Even the Epstein vote didn't land on 100%.
![]()
![]()
Oddly, treasury secretary claims immigrants bringing diseased cows are responsible for high beef prices. However experts blame Trump tariffs. Immigrants may be confused with criminals involved in smuggling of infected cattle into Mexico.
Oddly, treasury secretary claims immigrants bringing diseased cows are responsible for high beef prices. However experts blame Trump tariffs. Immigrants may be confused with criminals involved in smuggling of infected cattle into Mexico.
Threads with the title of this thread were discarded to the box at least eight times before this one was allowed to stay. Someone must have said "give them one and then we look fair". ![]()
This place is soooooooooooooooo lmaooooooooooooooooo funny. Guy comes in with nothing but antagonism and you are the one threatened to be boxed for responding. This is what Trump has done to them. Amazing.
Threads with the title of this thread were discarded to the box at least eight times before this one was allowed to stay. Someone must have said "give them one and then we look fair". ![]()
This place is soooooooooooooooo lmaooooooooooooooooo funny. Guy comes in with nothing but antagonism and you are the one threatened to be boxed for responding. This is what Trump has done to them. Amazing.
@THEMUGG
Yes exactly. Meanwhile we get to enjoy the stream of consciousness from king of the nonsensical.
@UNIMAN
Most would probably just accept a that's the way it is concession, but we'll just enjoy the winning in real life and let them do them in make believe land.
@THEMUGG
Yes exactly. Meanwhile we get to enjoy the stream of consciousness from king of the nonsensical.
@UNIMAN
Most would probably just accept a that's the way it is concession, but we'll just enjoy the winning in real life and let them do them in make believe land.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.