@BrazenBurrow Dont go that direction please, there is no need to preach religion to other members and it is not appropriate discussion for the main forums. Anyone who calls someone to God is not being Christian, you are not to judge or condemn others. The only action a Christian should take is to love all, follow the teachings of Christ and do unto others as you would want them to do to you. There is no place in true Christianity for condemnation or judging which kind of shuts down most of what actions Kirk took in his life.
@wallstreetcappers
"I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
@BrazenBurrow Dont go that direction please, there is no need to preach religion to other members and it is not appropriate discussion for the main forums. Anyone who calls someone to God is not being Christian, you are not to judge or condemn others. The only action a Christian should take is to love all, follow the teachings of Christ and do unto others as you would want them to do to you. There is no place in true Christianity for condemnation or judging which kind of shuts down most of what actions Kirk took in his life.
@Rowdie22 For Charlie Kirk, public debates are political theater. His goals are to promote racist propaganda and manipulate his audience.. He baits unprepared students into dishonest debates. Mocking expertise, twisting facts and selling hate as common sense. Even when proven wrong, he rejects legitimate facts. But MAGA audiences mistake rhetoric performance for truth.
Total and complete utter BS! NOTHING was ever racist. Time after time he let's them google the data only to prove them wrong.
@Rowdie22 For Charlie Kirk, public debates are political theater. His goals are to promote racist propaganda and manipulate his audience.. He baits unprepared students into dishonest debates. Mocking expertise, twisting facts and selling hate as common sense. Even when proven wrong, he rejects legitimate facts. But MAGA audiences mistake rhetoric performance for truth.
Total and complete utter BS! NOTHING was ever racist. Time after time he let's them google the data only to prove them wrong.
@BrazenBurrow Dont go that direction please, there is no need to preach religion to other members and it is not appropriate discussion for the main forums. Anyone who calls someone to God is not being Christian, you are not to judge or condemn others. The only action a Christian should take is to love all, follow the teachings of Christ and do unto others as you would want them to do to you. There is no place in true Christianity for condemnation or judging which kind of shuts down most of what actions Kirk took in his life.
I suppose that you need to scold me, in some odd way, to justify your existence as a Covers Linesman. However, BC has preached multiple times over the past 12 days about the need for people to find Jesue/God, even quoting scriptures, both in the mains & the PB. But whatever, I never questioned his Christianity...he questioned others.
@BrazenBurrow Dont go that direction please, there is no need to preach religion to other members and it is not appropriate discussion for the main forums. Anyone who calls someone to God is not being Christian, you are not to judge or condemn others. The only action a Christian should take is to love all, follow the teachings of Christ and do unto others as you would want them to do to you. There is no place in true Christianity for condemnation or judging which kind of shuts down most of what actions Kirk took in his life.
I suppose that you need to scold me, in some odd way, to justify your existence as a Covers Linesman. However, BC has preached multiple times over the past 12 days about the need for people to find Jesue/God, even quoting scriptures, both in the mains & the PB. But whatever, I never questioned his Christianity...he questioned others.
Ok so back off the mean mod stuff and just read what I said and I hope you decide to follow it. There is no place in the main forums for calling someone to religion or to condemn someone who has a different opinion than you.
There is absolutely no need for your hostility towards me, if you want to fight with another member or call them out the ONLY place we remotely allow it is in the box, but not sure why you would want to fight with another member and if you were trying to help a fellow member to find Christianity the condemnation and judgement route is not Christian at all.
Ok so back off the mean mod stuff and just read what I said and I hope you decide to follow it. There is no place in the main forums for calling someone to religion or to condemn someone who has a different opinion than you.
There is absolutely no need for your hostility towards me, if you want to fight with another member or call them out the ONLY place we remotely allow it is in the box, but not sure why you would want to fight with another member and if you were trying to help a fellow member to find Christianity the condemnation and judgement route is not Christian at all.
so you dont think the comment on black pilots was racist. You don't think his comments about civil rights was racist. You dont think his comments about black women was racist. You don't think his comments on mlk was racist. Nothing about gays and trans Palestinians run down the line.
All taken out of context I guess
Success is never final, failure is never fatal, and it's the courage that counts.
so you dont think the comment on black pilots was racist. You don't think his comments about civil rights was racist. You dont think his comments about black women was racist. You don't think his comments on mlk was racist. Nothing about gays and trans Palestinians run down the line.
@Rowdie22 so you dont think the comment on black pilots was racist. You don't think his comments about civil rights was racist. You dont think his comments about black women was racist. You don't think his comments on mlk was racist. Nothing about gays and trans Palestinians run down the line. All taken out of context I guess
Problem is racists dont believe other racists are racists. Even thou kirk said all these racist things,fellow racists will always say the things he said werent racist.
@Rowdie22 so you dont think the comment on black pilots was racist. You don't think his comments about civil rights was racist. You dont think his comments about black women was racist. You don't think his comments on mlk was racist. Nothing about gays and trans Palestinians run down the line. All taken out of context I guess
Problem is racists dont believe other racists are racists. Even thou kirk said all these racist things,fellow racists will always say the things he said werent racist.
@Rowdie22 so you dont think the comment on black pilots was racist. You don't think his comments about civil rights was racist. You dont think his comments about black women was racist. You don't think his comments on mlk was racist. Nothing about gays and trans Palestinians run down the line. All taken out of context I guess
CK just googled facts and repeated them. If they were "racist" that's just facts don't care about your feelings... /s
I can't believe the pretzels people twist themselves into. CK was allowed to be racist, and people are allowed to listen to him and agree. You are not going to convince the masses that CK was something he wasn't and quite frankly it doesn't matter. The pushback is because people know being a racist is abhorrent and don't want that stain on them or anything they associate with. Stand on your ten toes and stop gas-lighting people!
@Rowdie22 so you dont think the comment on black pilots was racist. You don't think his comments about civil rights was racist. You dont think his comments about black women was racist. You don't think his comments on mlk was racist. Nothing about gays and trans Palestinians run down the line. All taken out of context I guess
CK just googled facts and repeated them. If they were "racist" that's just facts don't care about your feelings... /s
I can't believe the pretzels people twist themselves into. CK was allowed to be racist, and people are allowed to listen to him and agree. You are not going to convince the masses that CK was something he wasn't and quite frankly it doesn't matter. The pushback is because people know being a racist is abhorrent and don't want that stain on them or anything they associate with. Stand on your ten toes and stop gas-lighting people!
@Rowdie22 so you dont think the comment on black pilots was racist. You don't think his comments about civil rights was racist. You dont think his comments about black women was racist. You don't think his comments on mlk was racist. Nothing about gays and trans Palestinians run down the line. All taken out of context I guess
@Rowdie22 so you dont think the comment on black pilots was racist. You don't think his comments about civil rights was racist. You dont think his comments about black women was racist. You don't think his comments on mlk was racist. Nothing about gays and trans Palestinians run down the line. All taken out of context I guess
Quote Originally Posted by Brooklyncapper: @Rowdie22 so you dont think the comment on black pilots was racist. You don't think his comments about civil rights was racist. You dont think his comments about black women was racist. You don't think his comments on mlk was racist. Nothing about gays and trans Palestinians run down the line. All taken out of context I guess NO
Racism is subjective. What a world we live in. I bet you think Loomer's comments weren't either?
Quote Originally Posted by Brooklyncapper: @Rowdie22 so you dont think the comment on black pilots was racist. You don't think his comments about civil rights was racist. You dont think his comments about black women was racist. You don't think his comments on mlk was racist. Nothing about gays and trans Palestinians run down the line. All taken out of context I guess NO
Racism is subjective. What a world we live in. I bet you think Loomer's comments weren't either?
Kirk said the truth outloud and deranged lefties can't handle that. The black pilot comment;
KIRK: You wanna go thought crime? I'm sorry. If I see a Black pilot, I'm gonna be like, "Boy, I hope he's qualified."
KOLVET: But you wouldn't have done that before!
KIRK: That's not an immediate … that's not who I am. That's not what I believe.
NEFF: It is the reality the left has created.
KIRK: I want to be as blunt as possible because now I'm connecting two dots. Wait a second, this CEO just said that he's forcing that a white qualified guy is not gonna get the job. So I see this guy, he might be a nice person and I say, "Boy, I hope he's not a Harvard-style affirmative-action student that … landed half of his flight-simulator trials."
It is truthful DEI talk. "It is the reality the left has created" So true.
Kirk said the truth outloud and deranged lefties can't handle that. The black pilot comment;
KIRK: You wanna go thought crime? I'm sorry. If I see a Black pilot, I'm gonna be like, "Boy, I hope he's qualified."
KOLVET: But you wouldn't have done that before!
KIRK: That's not an immediate … that's not who I am. That's not what I believe.
NEFF: It is the reality the left has created.
KIRK: I want to be as blunt as possible because now I'm connecting two dots. Wait a second, this CEO just said that he's forcing that a white qualified guy is not gonna get the job. So I see this guy, he might be a nice person and I say, "Boy, I hope he's not a Harvard-style affirmative-action student that … landed half of his flight-simulator trials."
It is truthful DEI talk. "It is the reality the left has created" So true.
Sorry but your reply is absolutely false especially the last bit and obviously Kirks white slant on what DEI is and WHO created DEI in the first place.
The LEFT did not create DEI and how could you or anyone suggest this? DEI exists because of disparity in the US society, the fact that white men controlled society (and still do) is what caused DEI. Without disparity there is no need for diversity and inclusion. The very existence of racism, sexism, color discrimination is why the term diversity exists and that is also deeply rooted in religion and for sure what Kirk created his image off and WHY he even had an audience.
People that cheer for a racist and sexist guy like Kirk associate with his views and are why society still forward white control and fights against nearly ANY version of DEI from the most conservative roots to the more extremist and narrow fringe that Kirk exploited and that SADLY several members here on this site agree with.
A society without the need to be inclusive and the need to try and elevate race/sex is a society that has evolved...this society if anything has devolved with garbage that Kirk supported.
Sorry but your reply is absolutely false especially the last bit and obviously Kirks white slant on what DEI is and WHO created DEI in the first place.
The LEFT did not create DEI and how could you or anyone suggest this? DEI exists because of disparity in the US society, the fact that white men controlled society (and still do) is what caused DEI. Without disparity there is no need for diversity and inclusion. The very existence of racism, sexism, color discrimination is why the term diversity exists and that is also deeply rooted in religion and for sure what Kirk created his image off and WHY he even had an audience.
People that cheer for a racist and sexist guy like Kirk associate with his views and are why society still forward white control and fights against nearly ANY version of DEI from the most conservative roots to the more extremist and narrow fringe that Kirk exploited and that SADLY several members here on this site agree with.
A society without the need to be inclusive and the need to try and elevate race/sex is a society that has evolved...this society if anything has devolved with garbage that Kirk supported.
@UNIMAN Sorry but your reply is absolutely false especially the last bit and obviously Kirks white slant on what DEI is and WHO created DEI in the first place. The LEFT did not create DEI and how could you or anyone suggest this? DEI exists because of disparity in the US society, the fact that white men controlled society (and still do) is what caused DEI. Without disparity there is no need for diversity and inclusion. The very existence of racism, sexism, color discrimination is why the term diversity exists and that is also deeply rooted in religion and for sure what Kirk created his image off and WHY he even had an audience. People that cheer for a racist and sexist guy like Kirk associate with his views and are why society still forward white control and fights against nearly ANY version of DEI from the most conservative roots to the more extremist and narrow fringe that Kirk exploited and that SADLY several members here on this site agree with. A society without the need to be inclusive and the need to try and elevate race/sex is a society that has evolved...this society if anything has devolved with garbage that Kirk supported.
I really think your post is a bunch of garbage itself. Racism, sexism, and color discrimination is not why the City of Baltimore School System has not had one student proficent in math.
@UNIMAN Sorry but your reply is absolutely false especially the last bit and obviously Kirks white slant on what DEI is and WHO created DEI in the first place. The LEFT did not create DEI and how could you or anyone suggest this? DEI exists because of disparity in the US society, the fact that white men controlled society (and still do) is what caused DEI. Without disparity there is no need for diversity and inclusion. The very existence of racism, sexism, color discrimination is why the term diversity exists and that is also deeply rooted in religion and for sure what Kirk created his image off and WHY he even had an audience. People that cheer for a racist and sexist guy like Kirk associate with his views and are why society still forward white control and fights against nearly ANY version of DEI from the most conservative roots to the more extremist and narrow fringe that Kirk exploited and that SADLY several members here on this site agree with. A society without the need to be inclusive and the need to try and elevate race/sex is a society that has evolved...this society if anything has devolved with garbage that Kirk supported.
I really think your post is a bunch of garbage itself. Racism, sexism, and color discrimination is not why the City of Baltimore School System has not had one student proficent in math.
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: @UNIMAN Sorry but your reply is absolutely false especially the last bit and obviously Kirks white slant on what DEI is and WHO created DEI in the first place. The LEFT did not create DEI and how could you or anyone suggest this? DEI exists because of disparity in the US society, the fact that white men controlled society (and still do) is what caused DEI. Without disparity there is no need for diversity and inclusion. The very existence of racism, sexism, color discrimination is why the term diversity exists and that is also deeply rooted in religion and for sure what Kirk created his image off and WHY he even had an audience. People that cheer for a racist and sexist guy like Kirk associate with his views and are why society still forward white control and fights against nearly ANY version of DEI from the most conservative roots to the more extremist and narrow fringe that Kirk exploited and that SADLY several members here on this site agree with. A society without the need to be inclusive and the need to try and elevate race/sex is a society that has evolved...this society if anything has devolved with garbage that Kirk supported. I really think your post is a bunch of garbage itself. Racism, sexism, and color discrimination is not why the City of Baltimore School System has not had one student proficent in math. https://foxbaltimore.com/news/project-baltimore/zero-students-math-proficient-maryland-mcap Maybe it's climate change?
I think you misread the story. It says there are 23 schools in Baltimore where not one kid is proficient in math. Another 8 schools where only one kid is proficient in math, etc.
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: @UNIMAN Sorry but your reply is absolutely false especially the last bit and obviously Kirks white slant on what DEI is and WHO created DEI in the first place. The LEFT did not create DEI and how could you or anyone suggest this? DEI exists because of disparity in the US society, the fact that white men controlled society (and still do) is what caused DEI. Without disparity there is no need for diversity and inclusion. The very existence of racism, sexism, color discrimination is why the term diversity exists and that is also deeply rooted in religion and for sure what Kirk created his image off and WHY he even had an audience. People that cheer for a racist and sexist guy like Kirk associate with his views and are why society still forward white control and fights against nearly ANY version of DEI from the most conservative roots to the more extremist and narrow fringe that Kirk exploited and that SADLY several members here on this site agree with. A society without the need to be inclusive and the need to try and elevate race/sex is a society that has evolved...this society if anything has devolved with garbage that Kirk supported. I really think your post is a bunch of garbage itself. Racism, sexism, and color discrimination is not why the City of Baltimore School System has not had one student proficent in math. https://foxbaltimore.com/news/project-baltimore/zero-students-math-proficient-maryland-mcap Maybe it's climate change?
I think you misread the story. It says there are 23 schools in Baltimore where not one kid is proficient in math. Another 8 schools where only one kid is proficient in math, etc.
IF YOU think Charlie Kirk wasn't a racist then you are a racist yourself
The racist label has no stick'em. Apply it all you want.
My point about Balitimore is this; #1, what is cause? Bad parenting? bad schools? If this happened in the community I currently live in there would be an uproar, full investigation, changes made and tracked. What are they doing there? In Oregon they said; Let's remove testing, it's racist.
What I see is party that wants you dependant on them. Just screw off and we will take of you. Depend on us......until we use illegal immigration to flood your communities and divert money meant for you and give it to the new voters.
As far as Kirk? His black pilot comment was dead on when considering different qualifications for different races. There's no racism there. Have no problem with say a tutoring program with extra schooling/training but in the end ALL must pass the same testing.
IF YOU think Charlie Kirk wasn't a racist then you are a racist yourself
The racist label has no stick'em. Apply it all you want.
My point about Balitimore is this; #1, what is cause? Bad parenting? bad schools? If this happened in the community I currently live in there would be an uproar, full investigation, changes made and tracked. What are they doing there? In Oregon they said; Let's remove testing, it's racist.
What I see is party that wants you dependant on them. Just screw off and we will take of you. Depend on us......until we use illegal immigration to flood your communities and divert money meant for you and give it to the new voters.
As far as Kirk? His black pilot comment was dead on when considering different qualifications for different races. There's no racism there. Have no problem with say a tutoring program with extra schooling/training but in the end ALL must pass the same testing.
Quote Originally Posted by UNIMAN: Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: @UNIMAN Sorry but your reply is absolutely false especially the last bit and obviously Kirks white slant on what DEI is and WHO created DEI in the first place. The LEFT did not create DEI and how could you or anyone suggest this? DEI exists because of disparity in the US society, the fact that white men controlled society (and still do) is what caused DEI. Without disparity there is no need for diversity and inclusion. The very existence of racism, sexism, color discrimination is why the term diversity exists and that is also deeply rooted in religion and for sure what Kirk created his image off and WHY he even had an audience. People that cheer for a racist and sexist guy like Kirk associate with his views and are why society still forward white control and fights against nearly ANY version of DEI from the most conservative roots to the more extremist and narrow fringe that Kirk exploited and that SADLY several members here on this site agree with. A society without the need to be inclusive and the need to try and elevate race/sex is a society that has evolved...this society if anything has devolved with garbage that Kirk supported. I really think your post is a bunch of garbage itself. Racism, sexism, and color discrimination is not why the City of Baltimore School System has not had one student proficent in math. https://foxbaltimore.com/news/project-baltimore/zero-students-math-proficient-maryland-mcap Maybe it's climate change? I think you misread the story. It says there are 23 schools in Baltimore where not one kid is proficient in math. Another 8 schools where only one kid is proficient in math, etc. The point is not lost though.
Quote Originally Posted by UNIMAN: Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: @UNIMAN Sorry but your reply is absolutely false especially the last bit and obviously Kirks white slant on what DEI is and WHO created DEI in the first place. The LEFT did not create DEI and how could you or anyone suggest this? DEI exists because of disparity in the US society, the fact that white men controlled society (and still do) is what caused DEI. Without disparity there is no need for diversity and inclusion. The very existence of racism, sexism, color discrimination is why the term diversity exists and that is also deeply rooted in religion and for sure what Kirk created his image off and WHY he even had an audience. People that cheer for a racist and sexist guy like Kirk associate with his views and are why society still forward white control and fights against nearly ANY version of DEI from the most conservative roots to the more extremist and narrow fringe that Kirk exploited and that SADLY several members here on this site agree with. A society without the need to be inclusive and the need to try and elevate race/sex is a society that has evolved...this society if anything has devolved with garbage that Kirk supported. I really think your post is a bunch of garbage itself. Racism, sexism, and color discrimination is not why the City of Baltimore School System has not had one student proficent in math. https://foxbaltimore.com/news/project-baltimore/zero-students-math-proficient-maryland-mcap Maybe it's climate change? I think you misread the story. It says there are 23 schools in Baltimore where not one kid is proficient in math. Another 8 schools where only one kid is proficient in math, etc. The point is not lost though.
Funny how anyone with a reasonable level of intelligence would equate math scores with a political affiliation, that is absurd and just plain pathetic. There are so many more markers that correlate to test scores and proficiency than what a parent or community political grouping is.
Are you or any of those who are trolling this atrocious line of reasoning seriously interested in the math proficiency for students in Baltimore or is this just a sick disgusting way of political generalizations that in the process are making absolutely NO positive outcomes for those poor kids in the school systems.
Funny how anyone with a reasonable level of intelligence would equate math scores with a political affiliation, that is absurd and just plain pathetic. There are so many more markers that correlate to test scores and proficiency than what a parent or community political grouping is.
Are you or any of those who are trolling this atrocious line of reasoning seriously interested in the math proficiency for students in Baltimore or is this just a sick disgusting way of political generalizations that in the process are making absolutely NO positive outcomes for those poor kids in the school systems.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.