All Forums | Systems & Strategies

JM V1 V2 V3 MLB system Lets post all MLB plays here.

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 45006
Posts: 500
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 76
Posted: #301
listen nole, didn't mean to start an argument, i enjoy your posts and reading them. all i was saying is that until i have 10+years of research using an Anti-Jm system then i dont think its smart to play.

Yes this Toronto loss is a shocker, never have seen a loss like this. not only did they lose the bet but they lost to one of the lowest ranked RPI's teams in the league not once but 4 times in a row. This is sports, the chances of this happening again are slim so its just unfortunate for us chasers as we endure a huge loss.

Lets be friendly here, ill follow the anti-jm picks but will not play them until i see consistent results. 

anyways this day sucks with Toronto losing. :-( 

be back tomorrow
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 2153
Posted: #302
Quote Originally Posted by nolemonasses:

5-0 in the fourth now.

Toronto f'ing sucks. I hope they lose their next 25 games in a row and die of gonnhorea and rot in hell.

NO YOU DIDN'T!!!!!  I lost that damn series too Nole... LMAO!!!!

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 2153
Posted: #303
Quote Originally Posted by nolemonasses:

Ok, how do you feel about the fact that following the system is gonna produce a series LOSS with Toronto? Ya know, the game that was officially a JM V3 series?

And, if we followed Mr. Technical, we would have missed the Mets win.

And up until today's upcoming V3 series loss with Toronto, the systems were doing the SAME. So how is that losing?

YOUR F'ING KILLING ME WITH LAUGHTER NOLE! STOP!  Mr. Technical? 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 90
Posted: #304

Wow...this TOR loss is probably worse than the SF loss earlier this year.  It cost me over 3 dimes and ruined a 5 team parlay with the other 4 teams winning.  A JM V3 play coupled with a AJM [D] play should have produced a winner..and they got blown out!!!  My stomach physically hurts.

To add salt in the wound...watch TOR win against the Yanks tomorrow...

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 2125
Posted: #305

Jag, totally cool bro .

I need some win streaks. All A games...

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 90
Posted: #306
TOR wins against YANKS!...Figures!!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 2153
Posted: #307
No shit. I guess tor was looking ahead 4 games. WTF?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 2153
Posted: #308
Tor beating NYY: if my calculations are correct, we should have mixed the JM w/ the grand martingale 6 game win or nothing bet. We would be up, i think, $5! 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 299
Posted: #309
looks lik we hav a v3 with dodgers 2day
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 2125
Posted: #310

Yes we do.

We had a V3 with Toronto and Clev too. Ugh.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 299
Posted: #311
wen did we hav a v3 with cleveland... i kno we had 1 with mets that lost but i dont remember cleveland
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 2153
Posted: #312
i dont remember clv either. tho they just swep TOR i wouldnt take them beecause, to quote the movie "major league", "they're still shitty!"
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 56
Posted: #313
Quote Originally Posted by nolemonasses:

Ok, how do you feel about the fact that following the system is gonna produce a series LOSS with Toronto? Ya know, the game that was officially a JM V3 series?

And, if we followed Mr. Technical, we would have missed the Mets win.

And up until today's upcoming V3 series loss with Toronto, the systems were doing the SAME. So how is that losing?

Im talking about just the V1... and these other systems is to keep junkies liek you betting... stick to v1 and dont be a junkie and ull win... but i guess you cant do that

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 2125
Posted: #314
Quote Originally Posted by JohnAnthony008:

Im talking about just the V1... and these other systems is to keep junkies liek you betting... stick to v1 and dont be a junkie and ull win... but i guess you cant do that

Nobody asked your opinion peckerneck. You have no idea what you are talking about. You need to look at the numbers before you make comments about things you know nothing about.

Besides, YOU said the Toronto game was an official V3 play. Can't recall how you said it, but it sure seemed like you were on it. And it lost. So are we really talking just V1?

And what's more pecksniff, you have no idea how much people put on which system. For all you know, AJM is for johnanthonys and giggles. Yeah, this is A BETTING FORUM SO OF COURSE SOME OF US LIKE ACTION. WTF IS IT TO YOU?

Why dont you go police someone else's thread?

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 2125
Posted: #315

Quote Originally Posted by GamblrzAnonyms:

wen did we hav a v3 with cleveland... i kno we had 1 with mets that lost but i dont remember cleveland

Guys, I merely meant we had a V3 with Tor VS Clev.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 2125
Posted: #316

Look johnant, some of us like to run multiple systems. Yes we all know JM is not a real guy and he did not create the systems and is a total scumbag.

We feel that running more than v1 using Labby lines will increase or units b/c there are more plays. Yes it can bring more losses too, but it brings many more wins that just v1. That's why we labby, to preserve our BRoll.

And running just V1 produced a loss this year. So, you are gonna have a lot less chances to win that back only running V1. You telling me you never run V3?

Hopefully this clears things up. I been following all this shit for a couple years now. I see all the systems and I see the degenerate aspect of it all ruin people. It all comes down to money management.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 56
Posted: #317
Quote Originally Posted by nolemonasses:

Nobody asked your opinion peckerneck. You have no idea what you are talking about. You need to look at the numbers before you make comments about things you know nothing about.

Besides, YOU said the Toronto game was an official V3 play. Can't recall how you said it, but it sure seemed like you were on it. And it lost. So are we really talking just V1?

And what's more pecksniff, you have no idea how much people put on which system. For all you know, AJM is for johnanthonys and giggles. Yeah, this is A BETTING FORUM SO OF COURSE SOME OF US LIKE ACTION. WTF IS IT TO YOU?

Why dont you go police someone else's thread?

no browntown i didnt do the jays im not a junkie like you... u must be stuck a truck bc your always crying about some loss

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 2153
Posted: #318
hey hey we're the junkies!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 2153
Posted: #319
hey hey we're the junkies!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 2125
Posted: #320

Who likes to lose? I like to vent here on the forum. Makes me feel better. Being fired-up and pissed off is different than crying.

Browntown? Now that's funny. Mostly, b/c Ive never heard that one used before.

You didnt explicitly say u did the Jays, but your post said you totally agreed with jagresti, who said 'V3 with Toronto is on', after explaining that the Mets series was not officially a v3.

Anyway, you NEVER play V3 or V2?

PLease see my post #316 above. I really cant explain it any better than that. If I am a junkie for gambling action, then you must be the Gambling Website Posting and Wagering Usage Police.

Have a good week. BOL with V1 the rest of the way.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 27
Posted: #321
TAM - BOS and PHI - ATL are official for today?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 299
Posted: #322
he only sent out philly as a play
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 475
Posted: #323

Tampa played Boston in a 2-game series after they were swept so its not a play on Tampa. 

Only Philly [A] today

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 56
Posted: #324
Quote Originally Posted by nolemonasses:

Who likes to lose? I like to vent here on the forum. Makes me feel better. Being fired-up and pissed off is different than crying.

Browntown? Now that's funny. Mostly, b/c Ive never heard that one used before.

You didnt explicitly say u did the Jays, but your post said you totally agreed with jagresti, who said 'V3 with Toronto is on', after explaining that the Mets series was not officially a v3.

Anyway, you NEVER play V3 or V2?

PLease see my post #316 above. I really cant explain it any better than that. If I am a junkie for gambling action, then you must be the Gambling Website Posting and Wagering Usage Police.

Have a good week. BOL with V1 the rest of the way.

Not only are you a junkie i think your an idiot bc i said i DONT play v2 or v3.. there is a v1 system game tonight bud, u should try and play it maybe you wont have to "vent" after

 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 56
Posted: #325
nolemonasses did u see that v1 win on game A once agian.. the doc! He's a Blue Jay at heart still
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.