All Forums | Systems & Strategies

Here NBA V2.0

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 56049
Posts: 593
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 2387
Posted: #501
Quote Originally Posted by sahlsa:



On the other hand, the Anti-JM seems to be a loosing-path last season, so why should it be different this season ?



 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 848
Posted: #502

Quote Originally Posted by whywtfwhy:

Can someone pls explain me what's so special about this stupid system?
I mean at first, when you have both team play one against each other, every team has 50% to win with the spread and for winning only one game out of 3 one team has 87.5% . So after buying those 3 points of course the % is raising up to 95-97%. That being said, can  someone please explain me what's the revolutionary here?!?!?! 

Yeah everyone can make a system like this one.. He just want to search a way for as little as faults as possible why won't he play every away series??? That's right because buying 3 points than gives him 2 or 3 faults more. But thanks to this he also passes maybe 90 winning series...

An if you buy 10 points with his "system" you will win every series...

Chose your own series guys. The ABC method is a very good one but chose your own matchups.

For exemple: Golden State plays now against BOS, LAL and Portland they will certainly will lose one ATS.

Or 2 series I played yesterday. My A game was Dallas at Denver if I would lost this one I still had Dallas vs Houston and vs Sacramento ( a sure win situation if you ask me )

The other series was Miami in it's A bet against Indiana a possiblie B game would have been against New Orleans and San Antonio also a sure win situation.

Tonight there are a couple more I will play!

That's a far better system than JM. And you will have a lot more picks... but also a couple of faults but with Labouchere money in the bank! 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 288
Posted: #503
Quote Originally Posted by onlinesport:

Chose your own series guys. The ABC method is a very good one but chose your own matchups.

For exemple: Golden State plays now against BOS, LAL and Portland they will certainly will lose one ATS.

Or 2 series I played yesterday. My A game was Dallas at Denver if I would lost this one I still had Dallas vs Houston and vs Sacramento ( a sure win situation if you ask me )

The other series was Miami in it's A bet against Indiana a possiblie B game would have been against New Orleans and San Antonio also a sure win situation.



If it was so easy to pick winners everybody would do it.

You would have to mention your games BEFORE they are played, and you would have to post all the games before anyone would agree that you pick the "sure" wins.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 848
Posted: #504

Quote Originally Posted by sahlsa:



If it was so easy to pick winners everybody would do it.

You would have to mention your games BEFORE they are played, and you would have to post all the games before anyone would agree that you pick the "sure" wins.

I've posted my plays for otnight in the personal nba chases thread! :)

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 2125
Posted: #505

What a shocker. Houston loses by 25.

Glad to see that JM could not worm his way out of that one and actually concedes a C loss.

Also glad I had the brains to not play that C game and the last 2 Sixers games.

Looks like there is going to be quite a stretch until more series come up in the 2nd week of Jan.

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 2125
Posted: #506
bump for sahlsa's spreadsheet on pg 20.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 26212
Posted: #507
Quote Originally Posted by sahlsa:



If it was so easy to pick winners everybody would do it.

You would have to mention your games BEFORE they are played, and you would have to post all the games before anyone would agree that you pick the "sure" wins.


no, just the good and best cappers pick winners everybody else uses systems ... no disrespect of course, just not many systems will bring profit and when they do is too little to make a living ...

just depends from what poi nt of view you are looking at it and what you want to achieve ...

good luck ...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 2894
Posted: #508
Did anyone get his email saying that going forward, take the moneyline on all games where the team is favored by more than 3 points, then asks the question of the century....

Now that he has made the change to the system he wanted to know whether or not to :
a)  Keep the record at 26-1 (since that is the record)
b)  Change the record to 27-0 (to retrofit his new filter)
c)  Change the record to 26-0 as if the Houston series never happened?

WTF??    This guy needs help!!!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 77
Posted: #509

[Quote: Originally Posted by usakangy] Did anyone get his email saying that going forward, take the moneyline on all games where the team is favored by more than 3 points, then asks the question of the century....

Now that he has made the change to the system he wanted to know whether or not to :
a)  Keep the record at 26-1 (since that is the record)
b)  Change the record to 27-0 (to retrofit his new filter)

Hey kang are you still betting nba without buying any points? If you are what kind of record (W/L  A,B,C bets) do you have. There is no fuckin way Im gonna bet the moneyline every time JM has our team as a favorite. Could you imanage being a 10-20 point favorite and loosing the game, The odds would wipe out your bank account. Anyway Id appreciate your feedback,thanks

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 2125
Posted: #510

Well, his follow up email is even better.

He says choice C was the majority vote, including his: Not count the loss! and not count it as a houston win either.

What an a-hole.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 307
Posted: #511
Quote Originally Posted by nolemonasses:

Well, his follow up email is even better.

He says choice C was the majority vote, including his: Not count the loss! and not count it as a houston win either.

What an a-hole.

yea thats for sure . Two years ago in mlb he had 7 loses and then made a filter change and said IF we would have used the filter we have "0" loses, and quess what...he started to advertise that he has "0" loses, I had the fucker and I lost all my betting money, so i've been down this road before, the only change is that this time he asked for our opinion as far as if he should count it as a lose, he didn't give us that option 2 years in mlb, he just claimed no loses even though he had 7 for that year. He'll never fuckin change.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 2894
Posted: #512
I told that idiot to stop changing his systems and retrofitting to sugarcoat his record.  26-1 IS the record, no doubt about it.  Told him to be a man and own up to the loss.  Every time he loses, it will be "one of those rare instances where..."
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2006
Posts: 2894
Posted: #513
Quote Originally Posted by glen30:

Quote Originally Posted by usakangy:

Did anyone get his email saying that going forward, take the moneyline on all games where the team is favored by more than 3 points, then asks the question of the century....

Now that he has made the change to the system he wanted to know whether or not to :
a)  Keep the record at 26-1 (since that is the record)
b)  Change the record to 27-0 (to retrofit his new filter)

Hey kang are you still betting nba without buying any points? If you are what kind of record (W/L  A,B,C bets) do you have. There is no fuckin way Im gonna bet the moneyline every time JM has our team as a favorite. Could you imanage being a 10-20 point favorite and loosing the game, The odds would wipe out your bank account. Anyway Id appreciate your feedback,thanks


I have to go back and plug in my spreadsheet.  I been away most of the past week and have not played all series due to missing some games.  I will post a running total in the coming week or so.  And to answer you question, yes, I still play it without buying the points.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 406
Posted: #514

Quote Originally Posted by nolemonasses:

bump for sahlsa's spreadsheet on pg 20.

 

The spreadsheet has mistakes.  EX. MIA Jan 8 has a 6 game road trip, the spread sheet has JAN 8, 10,11 as first 3 game series, then starts a new series on 13,15,16  You are only supposed to play the 1st series...

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 2125
Posted: #515

Thanks Hectar, i use it as a guide. I noticed the same thing with hockey. Still like it though.

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 288
Posted: #516
The 2nd series for NBA should have removed now https://sahlsa.dk/junk/Nba_Nhl_Bets_Oct_to_April.xls

I have not trimmed the NHL-games
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 406
Posted: #517

Feb 11 Thurs you have San Antonio, that is in the middle of an 8 game rd trip, and just before the 4 day all star break.

Just helping you out... Not nit-picking.  Thanks for all your work!!!

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 26212
Posted: #518
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 2125
Posted: #519
close one last nite with the knicks. i won by a 1/2 point. How did everyone else do with the line they got in at?
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 612
Posted: #520
Been away from this thread for a while.  My chase record is
14-1 2/3, the 2/3 being I skipped the Houston (C) loss.

What's the word on Vince Carter for Orlando?  If he is a scratch tomorrow night, I'm passing on that series.

What are the rest of you guys doing?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 395
Posted: #521
I'm taking orlando tmr....come on they r facing the kings...lol
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 7600
Posted: #522
everyones dangerous.....but i like your decision.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 612
Posted: #523
I have the Magic on the ML.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 612
Posted: #524
Quote Originally Posted by Firebird27:

I have the Magic on the ML. Let me change that to a


Tomorrow's play is on Phx ML.
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 2125
Posted: #525
Word up.
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.