Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Exactly that. Just tracking some crap. ChatGPT and DeepSeek both have done well with NCAA over the last two weeks but not so well with the NFL. @JassieJames
|
Otops | 5 |
|
![]() |
4 P.M. games Carolina vs. Arizona ChatGPT - The line is spot on. Matchup tilts Cardinals but definitely not a mismatch. Lean under. This is a no play. DeepSeek - Public is heavy on Carolina but the books are not budging off of -7 which means they are comfortable with needing Arizona. Totally a contrarian play but I'm backing the Cardinals -7 here. Denver vs. Indianapolis ChatGPT - Line favors Denver more than I think it should. Colts should be pick 'em. I'd play Colts money line in this one at +110. DeepSeek - Denver defense is not a good match for the Indianapolis quarterback situation. Lean to Broncos here but more for the UNDER 43.5. No side. Philadelphia vs. Kansas City ChatGPT - Public + sharp money aligned on KC, but books holding Philly as favorite ? this is a “pros vs pros” type game where either side is defensible. Chiefs money line has the value. DeepSeek - Philly's trench play gives them the advantage in my book but this has the making for a final possession winner. This is an even matchup but I'd be going with the home field advantage if I were forced to pick a side. The OVER makes more sense to me but I think I would watch and enjoy this one. |
Otops | 5 |
|
![]() |
NEIGHBOR JUST CAME TO MY DOOR AND KEPT ME FROM FINISHING MY POSTS. ChatGPT's TOP 3 Plays today for 1 P.M.: Miami -2 Dallas vs. Giants UNDER 44.5 Seattle vs. Pittsburgh UNDER 40.5 Honorable Mention Buffalo -6.5 Detroit -6
DeepSeek's TOP 3 Plays today for 1 P.M.: Miami -2 Dallas -4.5 N.Y. Jets +5.5 |
Otops | 5 |
|
![]() |
Good morning all! I haven't been around for a very, very long time. To be honest, I stopped gambling for more than ten years. Over the last few weeks, I decided to play around with the use of artificial intelligence when analyzing sporting events, handicapping, teams, etc. I'm not coming in here to tell you to bet anything posted below but I find a lot of the dialog very interesting with the AI platforms. At the moment, I'm sitting in a parking lot waiting for my wife to come out of a store. (I intended to post this from my desktop but timing isn't going to allow that.) And... Because of this, I'm paraphrasing what they are saying because toggling back-and-forth is taking me way more time than I intended. Also, these are just the 1 P.M. games. Cleveland vs. Baltimore ChatGPT - No line advantage. Slight lean to under 45.5 but wouldn't bet this game. DeepSeek - This is not a game with betting edge. New England vs. Miami This one took a lot of dialog. Both platforms thought Bill Belichick was still with New England. ?? ChatGPT - Thinks the raw line should be Miami -4.5 and, for that reason, finds value in Miami at -1.5 and -2. Doesn't seem value in the total DeepSeek - Agrees with ChatGPT N.Y. Giants vs. Dallas ChatGPT - My line has it at -6 but with all that money on Dallas it looks like a trap. I would not bet on this game. Under looks good but I'm passing. DeepSeek - Flat out said Dallas -4.5 up to -5. Does not feel like the over/under has any value. Jacksonville vs. Cincinnati ChatGPT - No value in the spread. Expecting a shootout and don't be afraid of the OVER 49.5. DeepSeek - The spread seems to be spot-on. I would look at the OVER before anything else but I think there are better places to put money today. Chicago vs. Detroit ChatGPT - My line is Detroit -7.5. It looks playable. The only path I see for Chicago is for Caleb Williams to create chaos with his legs and the Lions blowing coverage. I like Detroit -6. I also lean OVER but wouldn't touch it. DeepSeek - I see Chicago as a solid road dog in this seasonal situation. I like the points. I don't see any reason to bet the total. Buffalo vs. N.Y. Jets ChatGPT - Slight value to Buffalo -5.5 but my best bet is UNDER 47.5. I don't see this one getting over 44. DeepSeek - I like the home dog here +5.5 but the better play is the UNDER. Seattle vs. Pittsburgh ChatGPT - Market line is higher on the Steeler than my model. Lean to Seattle and their explosive wide receiving core. Lean to the under. DeepSeek - I look at this game to be a defensive battle. I have this game at 37 points so the UNDER would be my best bet. S.F. vs. N.O. ChatGPT - Public is heavy on New Orleans but the big money is on S.F. The line is on the money which makes this one hard for me to pick. OVER/UNDER is in line too. I pass. DeepSeek - This game offers some interesting situational factors. S.F. -3 is my pick but if it moves it is a no play. The total is very sharp. Los Angeles Rams vs. Tennessee ChatGPT - No real edge in this one. My line is Rams -6. Under looks like the best play in this one but it seems like it is a force play. DeepSeek - Overall edge tilts Rams, especially if they control game script early. No play though. |
Otops | 5 |
|
![]() |
@PayMeHardRock I've been away from this world for so long. I don't even know what this means. There used to be a PENALTY BOX. Is that still a thing? If yes, is that where he got thrown? |
Ilovefootballs | 40 |
|
![]() |
@Ilovefootballs I have been playing with the same however I have only been using ChatGPT and DeepSeek. I'm curious to know how you prompt. If you are ever up for a chat/discussion I would love to connect. Let me know. Nice hit, by the way! |
Ilovefootballs | 40 |
|
![]() |
I agree with you on the college piece. I have learned over time that college has treated me way, way better than the pros. As for the people that place those "easy money" bets like -1000, -1500, etc. they are way too comfortable for my liking. As a matter of fact, I'm the exact opposite. I'm notorious for putting $10 and $25 live down on teams that are losing by a lot. For example, I won $245 on a $10 bet tonight when the live line was +2450 for Buffalo. Now... 98% of the time I lose those but when they do win they tend to cover a bunch of the losers. And... They are always fun to root for.
Anyway... Back to work... |
BiaSaigon | 18 |
|
![]() |
Man! Good to know. UNDER is, by far, the hardest bet for me to throw down on in almost any sport. That said, when I get OVER I tend to lose often. I guess I need to learn. |
RSampsell | 3 |
|
![]() |
@Luv2Win06 This was a good call my friend. My first bet after a seven year hiatus was a win. |
newmarket | 22 |
|
![]() |
@Luv2Win06
I haven't placed a bet in more than seven years and this might just be my first. For some reason, just found the interest to dabble a bit again. Good luck to us (if you run with it)! |
newmarket | 22 |
|
![]() |
I don't think I ever read the majority of these comments so, so long ago. I doubt the majority of the people that responded are around anymore (like myself) but this was a refreshing BLAST-FROM-THE-PAST! |
Otops | 26 |
|
![]() |
@KempDunkListe Personally, I like your Nevada bet. I have already said (not in here being that this is my first day in years) that I think the Nevada going Democrat is the best bet value-wise. I am not sure if the cut-off for political bets have past but I would jump on this in a heartbeat (even right now). |
bigddaddy1960 | 267 |
|
![]() |
Hello all! I have been out of the game for a long time. Almost two years. I used to be a 5Dimes loyalist but I got into a nasty spat with them and they decided to close my account down. So... I am officially looking for a new book. Being that I have been out of it for a while, are there any new "stars" I should know about? Or is it the same 'ol, same 'ol? Curious to read any/all response when and if you find a moment to respond. Thank you ahead of time! |
Otops | 2 |
|
![]() |
If you could only search back to the old threads. |
Otops | 4 |
|
![]() |
Well... That's not cool. I was going to start posting Hot Girl of the Night (again). It has been a really long time! |
Otops | 4 |
|
![]() |
Is it possible to post pictures in here anymore? |
Otops | 4 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by Otops:
What is up Covers?!?! How the heck have all of you been?!?! I hope great! I am not sure when my last post was but I know it was quite some time ago. I want to get back into the swing of things after taking a full year and a month off. So I figured tonight would be the night. I like two games on the board and I am going to throw down on them. Nashville -1.5 (+227) for 300 to WIN 681.00 N.J. vs. Columbus 1P O1.5 (-145) for 290 to win 200.00 More to come but, as usual, it will be LIVE for me. Good luck to all tonight and I look forward to more time on the site (again)! |
Otops | 3 |
|
![]() |
What is up Covers?!?! How the heck have all of you been?!?! I hope great! I am not sure when my last post was but I know it was quite some time ago. I want to get back into the swing of things after taking a full year and a month off. So I figured tonight would be the night. I like two games on the board and I am going to throw down on them. Nashville -1.5 (+227) for 300 to WIN 681.00 N.J. vs. Columbus 1P O1.5 (-145) for 290 to win 200.00 More to come but, as usual, it will be LIVE for me. Good luck to all tonight and I look forward to more time on the site (again)! |
Otops | 3 |
|
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by jdr016: I wrote this is another thread. But, some of you need to get credit cards with better banks. The one credit card I use on 5Dimes is through Citi and they blocked any fraudulent attempts right away. I see people saying $ 2000 or $ 500 worth of charges were on my card. How could that even happen in this day and age? ![]() Funny you say this. I literally got a text message from Citi about twenty minutes ago letting me know about a 2672.82 charge trying to go through at Lowe's. Of course, this is the other card I use(d) with 5Dimes. NOW EVERY SINGLE CARD I HAVE USED AT 5DIMES HAS BEEN COMPROMISED!!! ALL THREE!!! WHAT A MESS!!!
|
alldub | 11 |
|
![]() |
WoW! I had no idea other people were getting hit with the fraudulent charges too! As I just posted in another thread, I was hit for a total of $2200 in fraudulent charges. Very, very inconvenient and 5Dimes and myself have mutually separated after more than nine years.
|
AustinSharp | 37 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.