| Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MIA Jaylen Wright 20+ rush yds +104 He came off the bench when Achane was injured last week vs Jets and performed well, 107 yds + 1TD Even with Achane’s return tonight I’m guessing he might get more touches than usual PIT DT Derrick Harmon might be out again, which will benefit Fins run game steelers have allowed 217 + 249 rush yds in the 2 games he’s missed GLTA |
Biscuit | 1 |
|
|
Illegal TD |
PUSSYGALORE333 | 68 |
|
|
TD Vikes |
PUSSYGALORE333 | 68 |
|
|
LAR +340 SEA +650 DEN +800 BUF +850 PHI +1100 HOU +1100 GBY +1100 NEP +1300 JAX +1700 SFO +2200 LAC +2200 BAL +2800 DET +3000 CHI +3500 TBY +7000 PIT +9000 |
Biscuit | 6 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1:
He's me Pappy
probably more like grandpa I remember when the Jets won the SB |
Biscuit | 7 |
|
|
Day started well, Swift TD +150, eagles 1Q, then bungles no show in 2H, Caleb needed just 1 more completion…….
packers TT Over 25’ -120 |
Biscuit | 7 |
|
|
Bengals -2’ -120 |
Biscuit | 7 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by WilliamMunny:
Quote Originally Posted by Biscuit: From yesterday’s press conference …..“If I want to keep doing this, then what am I trying to do with myself?” Burrow told reporters. “And I have to have fun doing it. You know, if it’s not fun, then what am I doing it for? So, that’s the mindset…….” would hate to see him go the way of Andrew Luck, maybe the bengals could trade him to a team with a decent O-line to give him renewed enthusiasm for playing Shocking to say the least.. I think he must have been having a bad day. I’m sure he will come out strong on Sunday. His teammates will pick him up. Higgins is out today. We will see how it shakes out. I will definitely have to revisit this play. Just added NE ML +100
I agree GL on your plays |
WilliamMunny | 31 |
|
|
GL |
Luv2Win06 | 7 |
|
|
Yeah colts DO have a slim chance of winning SU They are an above average team with a good OL + running back and a decent defense Rivers is a wild card, the odds are against him winning but it’s not unthinkable seahawks are a good team but they’ve also gotten fat on cupcakes so their record might look better than the team actually is I took colts + points but I suppose they have a punchers chance to win SU put it this way….if given a choice between raiders +575 or titans +600 or colts +700, I’d choose the colts GL on your plays |
Damien123 | 14 |
|
|
After looking at this matchup more closely I’m leaning packers, based on recent form in the last several games, compared to the broncos, the packers seem to be playing better defense, and are more committed to the running game, which is more important in late season weather. Also the broncos commit a lot of penalties, which could be the difference between winning and losing when facing better quality opponents Also apparently teams are starting to effectively neutralize the broncos simulated pressure looks with quick passes, which Love and the Packers have the talent and experience to do. Can Vance Joseph make the necessary adjustments to keep the packers offense in check? the packers have the more experienced QB and the more polished offense IMO and that might be the deciding factor in this game |
football_007 | 70 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by UglyKidJoe:
I was ready to bet my pick until I read this thread. Now I dont know again.
yeah, my thought is…..if it don’t fit, don’t force it I might do something in-game, depending on how it goes |
countrybob | 68 |
|
|
From yesterday’s press conference
…..“If I want to keep doing this, then what am I trying to do with myself?” Burrow told reporters. “And I have to have fun doing it. You know, if it’s not fun, then what am I doing it for? So, that’s the mindset…….”
would hate to see him go the way of Andrew Luck, maybe the bengals could trade him to a team with a decent O-line to give him renewed enthusiasm for playing |
WilliamMunny | 31 |
|
|
Caleb Williams 18+ completions +114
Ben Johnson quote after loss to Packers:
”"Something that I've kind of talked about over the last few weeks with Caleb is, man, how can I best serve him to get him in a rhythm early in games to where we can have some strong starts to the first half? When you're asking your first completion to be an 18-yard dagger route, that's not always the easiest thing, particularly in those elements on the road like that. [It's] something that he's certainly capable of doing. He makes that throw all the time in practice, and yet we weren't able to do it there yesterday that early in the game."
Answer: more easy completions by calling for short passes to build rhythm and confidence
|
WilliamMunny | 31 |
|
|
@tboon
@SecretAgentMan1 Thanks for the correction I knew that Tua had a shaky record in cold weather, so I did a search, and got those stats moral of the story……don’t blindly trust AI But I’m still on the Steelers this week |
WilliamMunny | 31 |
|
|
PIT -3 -120 Game forecast is for 21 degrees with a chance of snow. Tua is 0-7 in cold weather games (under 46 degrees), with 8 TDs 10 INTs and a 71 QB rating |
WilliamMunny | 31 |
|
|
@ndsent1
@camby700
Thanks guys GL on your plays |
Biscuit | 4 |
|
|
Eagles TT Over 16’ -105 |
Biscuit | 4 |
|
|
at first glance, 3 things favor broncos IMO 1. Home team + better defense + getting points = play ON the defenses are pretty close, tho broncos are marginally better, plus their O-line is better 2. Broncos W streak…….As a rule, you’re supposed to bet into a streak, not against it 3. When a visitor is favored, I usually like to see that they’ve won at that location recently, before I will back them. Packers last win @denver was in 2007 |
football_007 | 70 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
That was the same exact play that worked vs the Eagles. The same formation, the same play fake, the same back foot throw. Ben Johnson will have to answer questions about that call. It got put on tape for GB last week. The Bears won't see the #1 seed again this year, good luck
They were 5-12 last year, so they have made good progress so far
|
PeAceMaKer7690 | 30 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.