All Forums | Pro Football

Green Bay at Chicago (12/16/2012)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 10411
Posts: 64
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 777
Posted: #26
Bears are SO badly coached...as you kidding me, Mike Tice an Offensive Coordinator, what did he ever do to get that  position....Pack will have a couple plays, the Bears won't and although Cutler is talented, he tries so hard against GB that he usually screws up....Pack by 10.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 8227
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by DrDogs:

Two teams going in opposite directions. Gbay slow start now playing more solid. Chic starting to spiral downward in last part of the season. Not playing together. Team is not the same without urlacher. Cutler beat up. Line will go to 4. Take it. Gbay for the large. Not a lot of overs between these guys so ehh...
Line is steady GB at -3 hmmm
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 777
Posted: #28
How many different running plays will the Bears have against the Pack? 2 maybe? Will they even run a screen or a draw play? I doubt it. Will they have some kind of deception play-maybe 4 or 5 , like if someone with a brain was calling the days? heck no, wouldn't want to try to WIN the game, lets just play our vanilla offense and have guys go on their little silly pass patterns and let Jay throw it to them...we'll see what happens...a Bear loss!!!!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 8227
Posted: #29
Quote Originally Posted by imaxfli:

Bears are SO badly coached...as you kidding me, Mike Tice an Offensive Coordinator, what did he ever do to get that  position....Pack will have a couple plays, the Bears won't and although Cutler is talented, he tries so hard against GB that he usually screws up....Pack by 10.
Poor Cutler.......man must have a large life insurance policy. He shows true grit playing hurt. I think the team will respond to that. That Oline better show up for him (Cutler). The Packers Dline still sucks. Give me the home dog!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 36
Posted: #30
Urlacher needed for the bears in this one...soooo...Packers -3
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 361
Posted: #31
this game scares the hell outta me.  no urlacher, no robbie gould.  but bears should be due for a win vs. pack by now.  or u would think.  idk.  i can see packers winning game by 3 so this just doesnt interest me
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 746
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by king_of_diamond:

The Bears are FRAUDS!

They beat up on the bottom feeders, but can't beat a team that's playoff bound.  If they can step up and get themselves a statement win I might change my viewpoint on them, but right now they are nothing but a fraudulent team in my eyes. 

Their wins = colts (week 1), rams, cowboys, jaguars, lions, panthers, titans, Vikings (home)

Their loses = packers, texans, 49ers, Seahawks, Vikings (away)

I don't see a good win anywhere. 

The bears come in to this one losing 4 of their last 5. Green Bay has owned this series in recent years winning the last 5 and 7 of the last 8 dating back to 2009 (covering 6 of those 8). I don't see any reason why things would change now. 

Backing the packers (LARGE) and will continue to fade the fraudulent bears against quality opponents until they prove otherwise.  GL


Nice observation and nice post and great logic. Good work.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 1654
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by mellowman7883:

Greenbay has their running game going which will open up other possibilities. Greenbay already trashed Chicago earlier in the year. This is a gift at anything under 6.

 

Greenbay always always  wins chicago, I think Mccarthy has luvies number.

So, I love this game as Greenbay is still fighting for playoff positioning.

 

Greenbay large


I think Rodgers has the Bears number.
Lovie actually did well against GB with Favre.

That being said I still think Lovie gets outcoached against good teams. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 1560
Posted: #34
I locked in my bet yesterday with GB -3 because I thought the line would creep the other way and I didn't want to lay 3.5 or 4. Today it looks like the line is moving in the other direction even tho the public is on the pack. I am officially concerned. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 66
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by citysnow:

i will be at this game an its going to be cold!!!!!! leaving fri morning an only reason iam going to this game to see the BEARS win this in rev. home game should be a good one BEARS WINS OUT RIGHT IN THIS ONE

Cold??? It's gonna be upper 40's here! You call that cold for the middle of December in Chicago! Lol!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 3072
Posted: #36
Quote Originally Posted by vue21849:

  This is a game that will go a long way in determining who wins the  NFC North. While Chicago has lost 4 of their last 5 , they stand only one game behind GB. It is a matchup between the superior GB offense & the superior Bear defense. The Chicago defense was shown vulnerable to the run last week, but GB has nothing close to A.P. I see a very closely fought contest. See da Bears gutting out a tight win, in this spot.

CHICAGO   + 3

Glad you're on Cutler's rear end cuz that's where he'll be most of the game. Or maybe on the bench crying to his mommy cuz it hurts so bad, Packers LARGE

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 31
Posted: #37
[Quote: Originally Posted by TheQuadYeah]

BOOM!!!!

It's at Soldier Field, I'm taking the home dogs...........

If it was at Lambeau, I'd be betting it the other way..........

Bears Plus The Three.................

THESE GIRLS ARE MUCH TOO YOUNG TO BE ON THE INTERNET - EVEN ON A SITE FOR DEGENERATE GAMBLERS.

COME ON MAN!




 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 915
Posted: #38
PACKERS big time! 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 6
Posted: #39
Pack-3
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 1827
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by JustWin001:

Quote Originally Posted by TheQuadYeah:

BOOM!!!!

It's at Soldier Field, I'm taking the home dogs...........

If it was at Lambeau, I'd be betting it the other way..........

Bears Plus The Three.................

THESE GIRLS ARE MUCH TOO YOUNG TO BE ON THE INTERNET - EVEN ON A SITE FOR DEGENERATE GAMBLERS.

COME ON MAN!




Hmmmm - spoken like someone who just joined 16 days ago, and has a whopping 10 posts behind them. Beautiful there, Just "*ahem* "Win" 001, nice name - just textbook newbie and typically beautiful!!!!!!!!!!!!

Good Luck There Buddy!!!! Looking forward to seeing you with the banned handcuffs on in a month (if you even post that long, or - - if you even last long enough to read this post!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)

I LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 815
Posted: #41
delusional Bear's fans, your not supposed to let your emotions rule your betting behavior. Scrub Bears loosing four out of five. The only thing that concerns me is the line not moving.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 23
Posted: #42
Brandon Marshall ALL DAY GB SUCKS BIG TIME. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 23
Posted: #43
Ohhhh Hes Still Open ........#15= 7-11 Always open even on Christmas. Whos Guarding him? GB= No Defense at all Chicago has this one ...... 88 Jermoron Faggly keep talking worst te in nfl
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 23
Posted: #44
We need Urlack? You need Clay Mathews more
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 537
Posted: #45
Packers 16-5 vs Bears in Chi since 92. No HF edge there. The mirage of the Bears is now been exposed, this is simply not a serious contender and Pack probably knew it better than anyone else since they've owned them for years. Despite injuries everywhere GB has won plenty of games and will be very deep come playoff time. Cutler is a loser, Campbell's a loser and of course Lovie does just enough to keep his job but nothing more. Meanwhile McCarthys very underrated and did a great job this year with all the injuries. The Pack will lock up the Central and get ready for the playoffs.

GB wins 23-16
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 23
Posted: #46
Quote Originally Posted by imaxfli:

Bears are SO badly coached...as you kidding me, Mike Tice an Offensive Coordinator, what did he ever do to get that  position....Pack will have a couple plays, the Bears won't and although Cutler is talented, he tries so hard against GB that he usually screws up....Pack by 10.
       …......... HOLD UP TIGER! ....

How many different running plays will the bears have against the pack? What does GB even have a run game with a bunch of practice squad RB Alex Green? Who? Forte Runs WILD Marshall all Day And Night ........ Talking about bears run game with 3 or 4 practice squad RB's #getReal
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 23
Posted: #47
And delusionsnal bears fan nope .... Actually a Titans fan Steve McNair an Eddie George days CJ2K aint bad either GB is Over Rated Did We ALL forget about The Petersons ohh i ment Vikings showing the true Packers 1good running back made a bunch of probowl players look bad at home Gb won but Chicago aint the vikings there better Forte + Bush combo Cutler + Marshall. Hester punt/kick return way more threats an Chicago Home At Soilder Feild Alot more Hungry and needing a Win 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 23
Posted: #48
Quote Originally Posted by imaxfli:

How many different running plays will the Bears have against the Pack? 2 maybe? Will they even run a screen or a draw play? I doubt it. Will they have some kind of deception play-maybe 4 or 5 , like if someone with a brain was calling the days? heck no, wouldn't want to try to WIN the game, lets just play our vanilla offense and have guys go on their little silly pass patterns and let Jay throw it to them...we'll see what happens...a Bear loss!!!!


How many different running plays will the bears have against the pack? What does GB even have a run game with a bunch of practice squad RB Alex Green? Who? Forte Runs WILD Marshall all Day And Night ........ Talking about bears run game with 3 or 4 practice squad RB's #getReal
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 29
Posted: #49
packers are a tad overrated but its because of all their injuries. clay mathews back helps  when woodson and nelson come back they will be ok. Cutler might be my least favorite player of allt time. hes soft as baby garbage and marshall is all he has. no urlacker and jenning is questionable....pack-3  rodgers has a good day in my eyes and cutler ends up ont he bench with campbell throwing picks late    packers 24 bears 17
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2003
Posts: 247
Posted: #50
GB
All Forums | Pro Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.