Trump has bozos working for him. Total nut job yes men
Come on magas please try to explain this shit. Yeah i know its just fake new, right?
Heres the thing magas, real news companies actually do their jobs
https://www.alternet.org/send/carr-trump-kimmel/
Well, I mentioned. Brendan Carr, FCC chairman Brendan Carr, was named to the position by President Trump last year after rising through the ranks at the agency. He’s long spoken out against government censorship and for the freedom of speech.
In 2019. Carr posted on social media. Quote. ‘Should the government censor speech it doesn’t like? Of course not. The FCC does not have a roving mandate to police speech in. The name of the ‘public interest’.’
In 2021, he wrote. Quote, ‘A newsroom’s decision about what stories to cover and how to frame them should be beyond the reach of any government official.’
In 2022, Carr posted, quote, ‘political satire is one of the oldest and most important forms of free speech. It challenges those in power while using humor to draw more people into the discussion. That’s why people in influential positions have always targeted it for censorship.’
In 2023, he said, quote, ‘free speech is the counterweight – it is the check on government control. That is why censorship is the authoritarians dream.’
This stuff is all over the net, so even maga morons can go look it up for themselves. I hope some here try to defend this stuff cause it will show how clueless you are.
Trump has bozos working for him. Total nut job yes men
Come on magas please try to explain this shit. Yeah i know its just fake new, right?
Heres the thing magas, real news companies actually do their jobs
https://www.alternet.org/send/carr-trump-kimmel/
Well, I mentioned. Brendan Carr, FCC chairman Brendan Carr, was named to the position by President Trump last year after rising through the ranks at the agency. He’s long spoken out against government censorship and for the freedom of speech.
In 2019. Carr posted on social media. Quote. ‘Should the government censor speech it doesn’t like? Of course not. The FCC does not have a roving mandate to police speech in. The name of the ‘public interest’.’
In 2021, he wrote. Quote, ‘A newsroom’s decision about what stories to cover and how to frame them should be beyond the reach of any government official.’
In 2022, Carr posted, quote, ‘political satire is one of the oldest and most important forms of free speech. It challenges those in power while using humor to draw more people into the discussion. That’s why people in influential positions have always targeted it for censorship.’
In 2023, he said, quote, ‘free speech is the counterweight – it is the check on government control. That is why censorship is the authoritarians dream.’
This stuff is all over the net, so even maga morons can go look it up for themselves. I hope some here try to defend this stuff cause it will show how clueless you are.
I won’t defend it - because it can’t be defended - but this must be an American thing “That’s why people in influential positions have always targeted it for censorship” - I have never experienced that (neither here nor in one of our neighbouring countries) - our queen invited two people that are famous for impersonating her (make fun of her) - to perform at her 60 year old birthday - and we have entire comedy enterprises that only live of making fun of people in power
I won’t defend it - because it can’t be defended - but this must be an American thing “That’s why people in influential positions have always targeted it for censorship” - I have never experienced that (neither here nor in one of our neighbouring countries) - our queen invited two people that are famous for impersonating her (make fun of her) - to perform at her 60 year old birthday - and we have entire comedy enterprises that only live of making fun of people in power
I won’t defend it - because it can’t be defended - but this must be an American thing “That’s why people in influential positions have always targeted it for censorship” - I have never experienced that (neither here nor in one of our neighbouring countries) - our queen invited two people that are famous for impersonating her (make fun of her) - to perform at her 60 year old birthday - and we have entire comedy enterprises that only live of making fun of people in power
And thats the way it should be in a free country and always have been in the USA until the orange clown became President
I won’t defend it - because it can’t be defended - but this must be an American thing “That’s why people in influential positions have always targeted it for censorship” - I have never experienced that (neither here nor in one of our neighbouring countries) - our queen invited two people that are famous for impersonating her (make fun of her) - to perform at her 60 year old birthday - and we have entire comedy enterprises that only live of making fun of people in power
And thats the way it should be in a free country and always have been in the USA until the orange clown became President
Yup i would have bet 5k that magas would stay away, which they always do when real hard facts are put in front of them. They do this on every thread on any forums.
Like crickets in here, loll.
p.s. your orange clown leader is still going after abc and kimmel, cause hes a FASCIST DICTATOR (so stop saying hes not)
Yup i would have bet 5k that magas would stay away, which they always do when real hard facts are put in front of them. They do this on every thread on any forums.
Like crickets in here, loll.
p.s. your orange clown leader is still going after abc and kimmel, cause hes a FASCIST DICTATOR (so stop saying hes not)
As per your request made in my thread, kindly allow "the MAGA response"
1) This source of information is incredibly revealing about how, why, and what you post and is very difficult to navigate and has some factual inaccuracies.
2) Dave Portnoy has a great take on cancel culture that would be relevant here. I am not a fan personally of dredging a person's posting history from prior years. People and positions change as information or positions. Dan Bongino is a good example. However, in this example I'd agree with his earlier ideas on free speech.
3) Kimmel is a complex issue in that one side argues a licensed network must serve the public interest. The study showing that Kimmel had 58 liberal guests to 2 conservative supports their argument. I don't personally care, as i (am the rest of thr country) just don't watch.
3b) Kimmel is also complex in that Disney / ABC caved due to it's local affiliates preempting the show. As your side likes to say, there is no evidence Trump's fingerprints are on this. I'd be happy to review it if they were.
4) Based solely on your smears posted on here, i could see how a guy like you could / would be ok with Kimmelsl's blatant misrepresentation and attempted deceit of the shooter. However, I will always support his (and your) right to say it freely. It'll end up being the reason 6 of the 7 posts here are yours and he's lost 90% of his audience.
You want some kind of Ah Ha got you moment cause from highly placed ego maniac said the right thing publicly on Twitter but has a grudge.....nah
Or you want me to consign that Trump is directing things behind the scene and this guy is trying to advance or keep his position.....sure, I'll grant you that.
But understand thats all government everywhere up to and including prior administration's so it'd be a thin win for you.
As per your request made in my thread, kindly allow "the MAGA response"
1) This source of information is incredibly revealing about how, why, and what you post and is very difficult to navigate and has some factual inaccuracies.
2) Dave Portnoy has a great take on cancel culture that would be relevant here. I am not a fan personally of dredging a person's posting history from prior years. People and positions change as information or positions. Dan Bongino is a good example. However, in this example I'd agree with his earlier ideas on free speech.
3) Kimmel is a complex issue in that one side argues a licensed network must serve the public interest. The study showing that Kimmel had 58 liberal guests to 2 conservative supports their argument. I don't personally care, as i (am the rest of thr country) just don't watch.
3b) Kimmel is also complex in that Disney / ABC caved due to it's local affiliates preempting the show. As your side likes to say, there is no evidence Trump's fingerprints are on this. I'd be happy to review it if they were.
4) Based solely on your smears posted on here, i could see how a guy like you could / would be ok with Kimmelsl's blatant misrepresentation and attempted deceit of the shooter. However, I will always support his (and your) right to say it freely. It'll end up being the reason 6 of the 7 posts here are yours and he's lost 90% of his audience.
You want some kind of Ah Ha got you moment cause from highly placed ego maniac said the right thing publicly on Twitter but has a grudge.....nah
Or you want me to consign that Trump is directing things behind the scene and this guy is trying to advance or keep his position.....sure, I'll grant you that.
But understand thats all government everywhere up to and including prior administration's so it'd be a thin win for you.
@THEMUGG They want dialog but then don't like what it yields. They don't want conversation cause they might find what they've been told about "us" is wrong. Very sad existence.
@THEMUGG They want dialog but then don't like what it yields. They don't want conversation cause they might find what they've been told about "us" is wrong. Very sad existence.
As per your request made in my thread, kindly allow "the MAGA response" 1) This source of information is incredibly revealing about how, why, and what you post and is very difficult to navigate and has some factual inaccuracies. 2) Dave Portnoy has a great take on cancel culture that would be relevant here. I am not a fan personally of dredging a person's posting history from prior years. People and positions change as information or positions. Dan Bongino is a good example. However, in this example I'd agree with his earlier ideas on free speech. 3) Kimmel is a complex issue in that one side argues a licensed network must serve the public interest. The study showing that Kimmel had 58 liberal guests to 2 conservative supports their argument. I don't personally care, as i (am the rest of thr country) just don't watch. 3b) Kimmel is also complex in that Disney / ABC caved due to it's local affiliates preempting the show. As your side likes to say, there is no evidence Trump's fingerprints are on this. I'd be happy to review it if they were. 4) Based solely on your smears posted on here, i could see how a guy like you could / would be ok with Kimmelsl's blatant misrepresentation and attempted deceit of the shooter. However, I will always support his (and your) right to say it freely. It'll end up being the reason 6 of the 7 posts here are yours and he's lost 90% of his audience. You want some kind of Ah Ha got you moment cause from highly placed ego maniac said the right thing publicly on Twitter but has a grudge.....nah Or you want me to consign that Trump is directing things behind the scene and this guy is trying to advance or keep his position.....sure, I'll grant you that. But understand thats all government everywhere up to and including prior administration's so it'd be a thin win for you.
Sorry but you didnt answer the question i was looking for. I wanted know how the FCC chair could post one thing about freedom of speech but then do a complete 360 cause trump told him to. You really think this clown should have this job. Go read his tweets, then come back here and defend that.
Mugg with his typical reply, never addresses anybodys posts he knows he doesnt have a leg to stand on.
As per your request made in my thread, kindly allow "the MAGA response" 1) This source of information is incredibly revealing about how, why, and what you post and is very difficult to navigate and has some factual inaccuracies. 2) Dave Portnoy has a great take on cancel culture that would be relevant here. I am not a fan personally of dredging a person's posting history from prior years. People and positions change as information or positions. Dan Bongino is a good example. However, in this example I'd agree with his earlier ideas on free speech. 3) Kimmel is a complex issue in that one side argues a licensed network must serve the public interest. The study showing that Kimmel had 58 liberal guests to 2 conservative supports their argument. I don't personally care, as i (am the rest of thr country) just don't watch. 3b) Kimmel is also complex in that Disney / ABC caved due to it's local affiliates preempting the show. As your side likes to say, there is no evidence Trump's fingerprints are on this. I'd be happy to review it if they were. 4) Based solely on your smears posted on here, i could see how a guy like you could / would be ok with Kimmelsl's blatant misrepresentation and attempted deceit of the shooter. However, I will always support his (and your) right to say it freely. It'll end up being the reason 6 of the 7 posts here are yours and he's lost 90% of his audience. You want some kind of Ah Ha got you moment cause from highly placed ego maniac said the right thing publicly on Twitter but has a grudge.....nah Or you want me to consign that Trump is directing things behind the scene and this guy is trying to advance or keep his position.....sure, I'll grant you that. But understand thats all government everywhere up to and including prior administration's so it'd be a thin win for you.
Sorry but you didnt answer the question i was looking for. I wanted know how the FCC chair could post one thing about freedom of speech but then do a complete 360 cause trump told him to. You really think this clown should have this job. Go read his tweets, then come back here and defend that.
Mugg with his typical reply, never addresses anybodys posts he knows he doesnt have a leg to stand on.
Neither the article nor anything you offered shows any position change at the behest of Trump.
Any flip flop on his own would make sense from the ladder climbing type.
Any flip flop by direct orders of Trump would track with the corrupt nature of a political group in power......and doesnt bother me (either way). Kind of similar to Fanni Wills' lover and ada having multiple meetings in the white house.
There's nothing to defend nor condemn here. He seems a partisan doing partisan things.
Neither the article nor anything you offered shows any position change at the behest of Trump.
Any flip flop on his own would make sense from the ladder climbing type.
Any flip flop by direct orders of Trump would track with the corrupt nature of a political group in power......and doesnt bother me (either way). Kind of similar to Fanni Wills' lover and ada having multiple meetings in the white house.
There's nothing to defend nor condemn here. He seems a partisan doing partisan things.
And Ive asked why make the LIBS comment at all? Did this help the OP answer his question, did it retort his question did it bring new information and insight to the conversation? Or was it just another attempt at putting someone down and in the process break the rules?
If your remark adds no value and is a direct insult to the member, THIS is breaking the rules. You wonder why there are issues with conservatives being boxed more, well you just gave proof of why it happens as did that other member yesterday who could not be an adult and had to attack and insult someone to lead off a reply and the other alias who got banned a few days ago that did the same thing.
If you do not want to reply to his question then please stop interjecting useless insults and messages that serve no purpose and are breaking the rules.
And Ive asked why make the LIBS comment at all? Did this help the OP answer his question, did it retort his question did it bring new information and insight to the conversation? Or was it just another attempt at putting someone down and in the process break the rules?
If your remark adds no value and is a direct insult to the member, THIS is breaking the rules. You wonder why there are issues with conservatives being boxed more, well you just gave proof of why it happens as did that other member yesterday who could not be an adult and had to attack and insult someone to lead off a reply and the other alias who got banned a few days ago that did the same thing.
If you do not want to reply to his question then please stop interjecting useless insults and messages that serve no purpose and are breaking the rules.
If you do not want to reply to his question then please stop interjecting useless insults and messages that serve no purpose and are breaking the rules.
It'll stop when you make it stop which includes addressing MAGA insults, Facist, Pedo insults, Racist insults, *all MAGA supporters*.
This is a scenario of me personally not caring about those phases but pointing out the only one continually offended by the Mugg saying Lib-anything is you.
This mirrors the conversation between Stu and you the other day in multiple links. Conservatives walk on eggshells here and Libs have free reign.
If you do not want to reply to his question then please stop interjecting useless insults and messages that serve no purpose and are breaking the rules.
It'll stop when you make it stop which includes addressing MAGA insults, Facist, Pedo insults, Racist insults, *all MAGA supporters*.
This is a scenario of me personally not caring about those phases but pointing out the only one continually offended by the Mugg saying Lib-anything is you.
This mirrors the conversation between Stu and you the other day in multiple links. Conservatives walk on eggshells here and Libs have free reign.
I'll give a little credit where it was suggested to tone down the 'Trump Fuhrer' rhetoric by one member, but the remainder of those things remain valid.
I'll give a little credit where it was suggested to tone down the 'Trump Fuhrer' rhetoric by one member, but the remainder of those things remain valid.
I am not reply to you or your retorts, my message was to the other member not you. Also just so you are fully aware and understand when you are boxed or banned next time...the I will when someone else is routine is not going to work and if anything will result in a stronger more decisive action against you in the future.
Make decisions based on the rules and actually TRYING to be better than those you are complaining about or retorting to rationalize your bad behavior. This response is what someone 10 years old says not an alleged adult who should want to be better than the content they dislike.
I am not reply to you or your retorts, my message was to the other member not you. Also just so you are fully aware and understand when you are boxed or banned next time...the I will when someone else is routine is not going to work and if anything will result in a stronger more decisive action against you in the future.
Make decisions based on the rules and actually TRYING to be better than those you are complaining about or retorting to rationalize your bad behavior. This response is what someone 10 years old says not an alleged adult who should want to be better than the content they dislike.
Why don't you read post #1, post #6, & post #7..........is all that OK with you? Do you not see your own hypocrisy when you come here & scold ME for being insulting but ignore the OP's insults? Is that the rule/message here, that it's OK for left leaners to call conservatives here "maga" but not OK for conservatives to use the word "lib" to describe a lefty? "MAGA" isn't an insult but "lib" is?
Why don't you read post #1, post #6, & post #7..........is all that OK with you? Do you not see your own hypocrisy when you come here & scold ME for being insulting but ignore the OP's insults? Is that the rule/message here, that it's OK for left leaners to call conservatives here "maga" but not OK for conservatives to use the word "lib" to describe a lefty? "MAGA" isn't an insult but "lib" is?
@wallstreetcappers Why don't you read post #1, post #6, & post #7..........is all that OK with you? Do you not see your own hypocrisy when you come here & scold ME for being insulting but ignore the OP's insults? Is that the rule/message here, that it's OK for left leaners to call conservatives here "maga" but not OK for conservatives to use the word "lib" to describe a lefty? "MAGA" isn't an insult but "lib" is?
Unlike people like you, i truly dont care what you call me. So i give you total permission to call me what ever you because am not some sissy that get bent of shape cause i was called a name. Call me lib, asshole lib etc etc call me what ever your maga brain can come up. Thought magas were supposed to be these tough guys, doesnt appear they are. I bet most of you ran to the principal when called a name in school. You all need to grow a tougher shell, cause its just words. Now on another not, why do you magas get bent of shape for being called a maga? Thought that being apart of that movement was an honor or dont you want to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.
I really thought all you magas would love being called maga. Maybe the truth is you are all embarrassed that the history books will write the maga party as the worst political group our country has ever seen.
So i wait for some good names to call me and i promise i wont run to the mods asking for help. Just dont insult my family and you can say anything to me. Wallstreet and other Mods, am okay if the magas want to call me any vile names they can think of, really doubt they will come up with anything good because magas dont get that maga moron name for nothing.
@wallstreetcappers Why don't you read post #1, post #6, & post #7..........is all that OK with you? Do you not see your own hypocrisy when you come here & scold ME for being insulting but ignore the OP's insults? Is that the rule/message here, that it's OK for left leaners to call conservatives here "maga" but not OK for conservatives to use the word "lib" to describe a lefty? "MAGA" isn't an insult but "lib" is?
Unlike people like you, i truly dont care what you call me. So i give you total permission to call me what ever you because am not some sissy that get bent of shape cause i was called a name. Call me lib, asshole lib etc etc call me what ever your maga brain can come up. Thought magas were supposed to be these tough guys, doesnt appear they are. I bet most of you ran to the principal when called a name in school. You all need to grow a tougher shell, cause its just words. Now on another not, why do you magas get bent of shape for being called a maga? Thought that being apart of that movement was an honor or dont you want to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.
I really thought all you magas would love being called maga. Maybe the truth is you are all embarrassed that the history books will write the maga party as the worst political group our country has ever seen.
So i wait for some good names to call me and i promise i wont run to the mods asking for help. Just dont insult my family and you can say anything to me. Wallstreet and other Mods, am okay if the magas want to call me any vile names they can think of, really doubt they will come up with anything good because magas dont get that maga moron name for nothing.
"So i wait for some good names to call me and i promise i wont run to the mods asking for help. Just dont insult my family and you can say anything to me. Wallstreet and other Mods, am okay if the magas want to call me any vile names they can think of, really doubt they will come up with anything good because magas dont get that maga moron name for nothing."
Ironically, you're the only one prone to calling other people names........& the rest of us don't care. But anytime there's even the slightest hint that someone may have insulted you, you run to the mods &, without hesitation, wall shows up to browbeat/threaten the "offender". This all well-documented here......everyone can see it.
"So i wait for some good names to call me and i promise i wont run to the mods asking for help. Just dont insult my family and you can say anything to me. Wallstreet and other Mods, am okay if the magas want to call me any vile names they can think of, really doubt they will come up with anything good because magas dont get that maga moron name for nothing."
Ironically, you're the only one prone to calling other people names........& the rest of us don't care. But anytime there's even the slightest hint that someone may have insulted you, you run to the mods &, without hesitation, wall shows up to browbeat/threaten the "offender". This all well-documented here......everyone can see it.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
