@ABooksNightmare
Im talking about someone who used his platform to say heinous things
like
if i see a black pilot im going to be like boy i hope hes qualified.
Called the civil rights movement a huge mistake and an anti
white weapon.
Calling black womaen moronic and say that got hired based
on race and not merit. Saying black women didn't have the
brain processing power to be taken seriously. Saying they
steal jobs from white men.
Calling MLk awful and not worthy of a national holiday.
Calling Ketanji jackson an affirmative action pick. BLAMED
Black fire chief for flooding deaths un austin.
Said Juneteenth shouldnt be a federal holiday.
talking about execution of gays and transgender people.
He was a disgusting individual. Did he deserve to die that way?
of course not but he wasn't a good person and doesn't deserve to
be celebrated.
@jpot34
Margarine trailer park greene , Laurie blow job in a bowling alley boebert, Paul nazi rosary, Ted fly to Mexico during a hurricane Cruz, matt underage girls gaetz,
Blah blah blah
We know you live attacking minorities so..
"Anyone can reply in this thread and if you make a critical comment to me you for sure can expect a reply."
See #20-22
"It could be said that several of you have made boxable replies and probably many could be boxed."
Kindly point me to any of the several box worthy replies of the 42 that I made at the time of this statement. The gang comment is the only thing that walks the line, but I didnt make it.
The record shows that covers asked for "combative" discussions be taken to the box and then covers staff attempted "combative" discussion which was politely declined in the thread. This isn't an attempt to be combative but discuss factually inaccurate statements made by covers.
"The members who cry foul the most are those who are instigating member to member abuses, including obviously you here."
Two quick thoughts
The choice to use "cry" as a means of dismissing a faction of members' concerns over impartiality is both interesting and telling.
Secondly, 4 of my 5 boxings would suggest otherwise. Glad to revisit each of them as the record remains preserved.
Leave me out of your nonsense
Dismissive of members legitimate and respective concerns, threatening, and still unfit for leadership.
Absolute disgraceful shame that a legitimate attempt at discussion to advance our experience is met like this.
https://www.covers.com/forum/politics-87/another-trump-bozo-exposed-in-his-own-tweet-fcc-chair-brendan-carrs-2022-tweet-103975979
Also, they have locked my thread in the help forum.....facist much?
not have you pull the mod fair card instead.
moderation:
the avoidance of excess or extremes, especially in one's behavior or political opinions.
So the existence of a perceived mod fair card coupled with the existence a group feeling they need a mod fair card directly suggests that moderation as defined is not taking place.
Now there were two suggestions in the most recent that discussion on this front is "off topic"; however, in reviewing many other threads it's been an ongoing topic for quite some time.
Once again:
the avoidance of excess or extremes,
"So how about we skip the personal insults for once and just stick to discussing topics. I wonder why I draw conclusions on who makes the personal insults and who does not."
#3332 & #3336 - no worries, make all the homophobic innuendos you like and include graphic language.
https://www.covers.com/forum/politics-87/i39m-embarrassed-for-trump-supporters-103487487/134
But "little girls" is definitely over the line and will not be tolerated!!!!!!!
zackly...it's comedy.
The dude has been typing snide remarks all over the place for months. Not one word to him, but I make a couple comments, truthful as well, and remarks come out.....had he said nothing, ok, but it's definitely a stab for no reason.
This cat has so many more posts other than what you are pointing out there....very odd behavior and really just proves the point that has been made over and over again...talking about others sucking dick is perfectly fine, but calling out someone for talking trash about America repeatedly while not even being from this country is prohibited...make it make sense
@ABooksNightmare
A few things for the record:
1) I didn't start this thread and management has allowed it to persist, making contributions welcomed.
2) The spirit of my posts are to document blatant hypocrisy from their own fingers for when it's later denied.
3) while I wouldn't speak that way on here, I have no real issue with that person or his words as they are just that words. I support his right to say and swing his nordic around. They are words however in violation of the rules that are ignored. I am also fine with leeway. However when lesser perceived offenses become actionable against others that is where the record will be preserved.
Preserving the record. WSC own words:
"Anyone can reply in this thread and if you make a critical comment to me you for sure can expect a reply."
So when box stuff carries over to the mains and I am named personally without provocation and no legitimate contribution to the thread other than "taunting" a reply seems warranted under previous moderation guidance.
Again, perfectly fine with the reprimand but if the goal is to curtail how people treat eachother, it'd been easy to tag two members.
You can call me a bitch, but you can't say I'm wrong.
https://www.covers.com/forum/politics-87/history-won39t-be-kind-to-donald-dump-103982057
"@unplucked_gem
That is not your place and since you seem to regularly bash me in the box I am not interested in what your take is on fair and any decision. That was the only warning I will give and I am positive your spin is erroneous and that you know FULLY what I am saying and given your long track record of stalking and combative posting I would not repeat this in any form again. You would be wise to listen and try to avoid others that you are pile fighting with in the box when you are out here."
Posting direct quotes to preserve the record of hypocrisy is not "bashing".
I will not engage in a back and fourth with you in the mains, but we can talk about it here. I did not create this thread about you and it remains available to post in.
Direct Quotes cannot be spun, it's just tough to hear. You want to ban me for holding you accountable to your own words be my guest, it'll prove everyone here right.
As for my need of covers, 3 messages to legal@cs-medialtd.com and two phone calls over the last 10 months.
Hi! I hadn't even noticed that I received an honorable mention here. I'm sure I would've been boxed if you had reported my message. I've been boxed four or five times as far as I recall, which isn't a world-record-breaking figure, but it shows that I don't receive special treatment. I think it's probably a combination of how extreme I am in my "insults" (so you don't really take it seriously and it isn't meant as such actually) and how I don't complain when you do similar things to me. Seriously, I wouldn't care one bit if you had said that to me word for word ! And I wouldn't change my behavior if I was boxed every single time. If anything, I would just come back twice as bad next time! He's a smart guy who boxes people that are affected by stuff like that - and ignores those who really wouldn't care for 14 days in here - I said 4-5 times before because I really don't know - I can easily also have been boxed multiple times without even noticing it. I'm the kind of guy who, if you threw me in prison for rape, would rape your sister as soon as I was released — having learned nothing from your "punishment."
Established in 1995,
hypocrite most would call that 
president is irrelevant and means nothing
Hot Forum Topics
