For those looking, the idiot moderators moved my intriguing tread to the penalty box for some unknown reason??? I thought this was a gambling website to help people give their insights on games and prop bets. I guess the moderators are in love with the " GREAT FLOUNDER" like the media is and they can't stand the fact I'm making thousands of dollars when he strikes out. Anyways, if you want to make money, take 1+ k on the great Mike Trout and you will make easy money! I give winners every day. And the FLOUNDER lover moderators can't stand it. Ban me, move this thread, it doesn't matter. I'm making thousands of dollars either way. If they ban me, I'll just make another account with a different email. These moderators are a bunch of dorks
For those looking, the idiot moderators moved my intriguing tread to the penalty box for some unknown reason??? I thought this was a gambling website to help people give their insights on games and prop bets. I guess the moderators are in love with the " GREAT FLOUNDER" like the media is and they can't stand the fact I'm making thousands of dollars when he strikes out. Anyways, if you want to make money, take 1+ k on the great Mike Trout and you will make easy money! I give winners every day. And the FLOUNDER lover moderators can't stand it. Ban me, move this thread, it doesn't matter. I'm making thousands of dollars either way. If they ban me, I'll just make another account with a different email. These moderators are a bunch of dorks
Yet people in the media and of some fans thinks this dude is a first ballot Hall of famer??? He will be in the Hall of Fame, only because he's popular, not because of his stats. He will have the shortest introduction speech in the history of the HOF. Seriously? What are they going to talk about in his introduction speech. Are they going to talk about his 3,000 hits, 600 home runs, 500 home runs, 450 home runs, above 300 batting average, World Series mvps, championships, division titles, playoff wins, gold gloves, batting titles, triple crowns. He won't have any of these??? His introduction speech will last about 20 seconds. In the meantime, as long as this fat ass plays and not on the bench for some mysterious reason, I'll be making thousands of more dollars when he strikes out.
Yet people in the media and of some fans thinks this dude is a first ballot Hall of famer??? He will be in the Hall of Fame, only because he's popular, not because of his stats. He will have the shortest introduction speech in the history of the HOF. Seriously? What are they going to talk about in his introduction speech. Are they going to talk about his 3,000 hits, 600 home runs, 500 home runs, 450 home runs, above 300 batting average, World Series mvps, championships, division titles, playoff wins, gold gloves, batting titles, triple crowns. He won't have any of these??? His introduction speech will last about 20 seconds. In the meantime, as long as this fat ass plays and not on the bench for some mysterious reason, I'll be making thousands of more dollars when he strikes out.
Take 1+ k on the " GREAT MIKE FLOUNDER" and you'll be happy. You'll make easy money like I have been doing for over two seasons when he strikes out. But the moderators get mad at me when I post this, so they move it to the penalty box or ban me. They think that's going to stop me from making money.
Take 1+ k on the " GREAT MIKE FLOUNDER" and you'll be happy. You'll make easy money like I have been doing for over two seasons when he strikes out. But the moderators get mad at me when I post this, so they move it to the penalty box or ban me. They think that's going to stop me from making money.
Dude, I'm not banned any longer. But your post, is completely, utterly, way off!!!! I don't know where, how you got your numbers. Because they aren't close. It's real simple. As of today. I have 45 wins, 22 losses, 43 pushes. I don't know the exact numbers because the odds have changed throughout the season. But I am around +7k in 2025. I've been doing this for three seasons with this loser. Like I said, I win $300 every time. The odds have changed throughout the season but the average is around -300. You do the math. 45 x 300 for the wins, 22 x 300 on the losses. There is your grand total. Like I said, I have no idea where you got your number from because they are completely, completely, off
Dude, I'm not banned any longer. But your post, is completely, utterly, way off!!!! I don't know where, how you got your numbers. Because they aren't close. It's real simple. As of today. I have 45 wins, 22 losses, 43 pushes. I don't know the exact numbers because the odds have changed throughout the season. But I am around +7k in 2025. I've been doing this for three seasons with this loser. Like I said, I win $300 every time. The odds have changed throughout the season but the average is around -300. You do the math. 45 x 300 for the wins, 22 x 300 on the losses. There is your grand total. Like I said, I have no idea where you got your number from because they are completely, completely, off
I find it hilarious the two games "the great Mike Trout missed" the Angels WON. Now he has played two games, and the angels have LOST! That's because he's worthless. And he is the reason why the Angels lose. I know for a fact how many times he is struck out or made the final out to end the game or a rally killer his whole career. He's worthless, he always has been. All he does is win me $300 a night, and hit a meaningless home run in July.
I find it hilarious the two games "the great Mike Trout missed" the Angels WON. Now he has played two games, and the angels have LOST! That's because he's worthless. And he is the reason why the Angels lose. I know for a fact how many times he is struck out or made the final out to end the game or a rally killer his whole career. He's worthless, he always has been. All he does is win me $300 a night, and hit a meaningless home run in July.
I may have put the info in wrong. I just used a random AI search, so it is likely I worded it wrong.
When I go to baseball-almanac with the game logs it looked like this:
48w - 22l Trout
45w - 41l Judge
49w - 36l Schwarber
Which is more in line with what you have.
I was just curious because I am not really a prop player. So, I was not sure if you were blindly betting this or picking your spots.
I will say that as talented as Trout is/was a good case can be made that he was one of the first that seemed to put emphasis on the new analytics and swing angle and velocity stuff.
I do not care much for the way so many of the modern power hitters are all or nothing. I get that the game and emphasis has changed but do not like the way it has changed the game.
I may have put the info in wrong. I just used a random AI search, so it is likely I worded it wrong.
When I go to baseball-almanac with the game logs it looked like this:
48w - 22l Trout
45w - 41l Judge
49w - 36l Schwarber
Which is more in line with what you have.
I was just curious because I am not really a prop player. So, I was not sure if you were blindly betting this or picking your spots.
I will say that as talented as Trout is/was a good case can be made that he was one of the first that seemed to put emphasis on the new analytics and swing angle and velocity stuff.
I do not care much for the way so many of the modern power hitters are all or nothing. I get that the game and emphasis has changed but do not like the way it has changed the game.
So, if you are getting +200/+300 on some of these guys to hit this prop — how are the books not getting killed on them? If it is -100 when you lose and a push on 1 strikeout?
Folks could open accounts on multiple books just to play these props on guys that hit it the most.Then they could have friends open additional accounts just for them to have then do it on those accounts for them.
What am I missing with this prop?Do I have something major wrong about it?Because there are a few power hitters that will strikeout 2 or more times more than they will strike out zero times — to make it profitable at those odds?
So, if you are getting +200/+300 on some of these guys to hit this prop — how are the books not getting killed on them? If it is -100 when you lose and a push on 1 strikeout?
Folks could open accounts on multiple books just to play these props on guys that hit it the most.Then they could have friends open additional accounts just for them to have then do it on those accounts for them.
What am I missing with this prop?Do I have something major wrong about it?Because there are a few power hitters that will strikeout 2 or more times more than they will strike out zero times — to make it profitable at those odds?
1), very few books offer strikeout props. The 2 sportsbooks I use don't offer it, I found it at a 3rd sportsbook a few years ago. 2) prop bets have "maximum" amounts to win. In this case, it's to "win 300" is the maximum you can win. 3) it is not -100 when I lose. The odds change with the pitcher Trout faces each game. It's not the same odds every game because of the pitcher. But it's an average of -300 when I lose. Sometimes I lose a little more, sometimes a little less. I don't know exactly, but that's close. 4) other power hitter who strike out more than Trout, which are few, schwarber, judge, their odds will be higher, but not much higher. I have actually never looked because I'm making great money on Trout and don't want to press the issue with the sportsbook. A few years ago a sportsbook cut me off for winning too much, and I did use my brother-in-law name to start another account. I hope you understand better, thanks for the question.
1), very few books offer strikeout props. The 2 sportsbooks I use don't offer it, I found it at a 3rd sportsbook a few years ago. 2) prop bets have "maximum" amounts to win. In this case, it's to "win 300" is the maximum you can win. 3) it is not -100 when I lose. The odds change with the pitcher Trout faces each game. It's not the same odds every game because of the pitcher. But it's an average of -300 when I lose. Sometimes I lose a little more, sometimes a little less. I don't know exactly, but that's close. 4) other power hitter who strike out more than Trout, which are few, schwarber, judge, their odds will be higher, but not much higher. I have actually never looked because I'm making great money on Trout and don't want to press the issue with the sportsbook. A few years ago a sportsbook cut me off for winning too much, and I did use my brother-in-law name to start another account. I hope you understand better, thanks for the question.
I can't name the sports book that has the strikeout props. That goes against covers rules, they think I'm trying to advertise for them. I'm trying to stay on the good side of covers this time. But they are there. At the beginning of the season, it was +100. But of course the books adjusted when Trout started striking out at a high rate. But I knew he was going to strike out again this year, this is 6 years in a row he will have more strikeouts than hits. And next year it will be 7 years in a row. His career is over, it's been over. The dude is worthless as a baseball player
I can't name the sports book that has the strikeout props. That goes against covers rules, they think I'm trying to advertise for them. I'm trying to stay on the good side of covers this time. But they are there. At the beginning of the season, it was +100. But of course the books adjusted when Trout started striking out at a high rate. But I knew he was going to strike out again this year, this is 6 years in a row he will have more strikeouts than hits. And next year it will be 7 years in a row. His career is over, it's been over. The dude is worthless as a baseball player
Samples today. Like I said, odds change with who's pitching. Trout 1+ k, -300, 2+ k +130, 1st PA k, +185. Judge 1+ k, -265, 2+ k +225, 1 PA k, +240. Look at the odds of difference between the 2. Trout 2+k is ONLY +130. That's a very low number!!! Because sports books knows he will probably k 2 times again. The books have caught up with Trout strikeouts. It's almost not worth playing anymore. But in August, I raked in the cash. GL
Samples today. Like I said, odds change with who's pitching. Trout 1+ k, -300, 2+ k +130, 1st PA k, +185. Judge 1+ k, -265, 2+ k +225, 1 PA k, +240. Look at the odds of difference between the 2. Trout 2+k is ONLY +130. That's a very low number!!! Because sports books knows he will probably k 2 times again. The books have caught up with Trout strikeouts. It's almost not worth playing anymore. But in August, I raked in the cash. GL
"push" for me tonight. I'll take it. And I find this hilarious. The two games that "the great Mike Flounder" mysteriously missed, the Angels won. Now he's been back for 3 games, and the Angels are 0-3 with him back in the lineup. Coincidence??? Is it????? I don't think so people. I have tracked this so called Superstar. He is far from being a superstar. Even ESPN has mentioned how he can't hit under pressure. Over the years, this dude has ended a lot of Angels rallies by popping up or striking out. This dude has been hurting the Angels team for a long time.
"push" for me tonight. I'll take it. And I find this hilarious. The two games that "the great Mike Flounder" mysteriously missed, the Angels won. Now he's been back for 3 games, and the Angels are 0-3 with him back in the lineup. Coincidence??? Is it????? I don't think so people. I have tracked this so called Superstar. He is far from being a superstar. Even ESPN has mentioned how he can't hit under pressure. Over the years, this dude has ended a lot of Angels rallies by popping up or striking out. This dude has been hurting the Angels team for a long time.
Who struck out a few years ago to end the WBC for the US team? I'll give you one guess? But I digress. As long as he keeps winning me $300 a night, I'll take it.
Who struck out a few years ago to end the WBC for the US team? I'll give you one guess? But I digress. As long as he keeps winning me $300 a night, I'll take it.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.