Inside the link below is Megyn Kelly's opinion of our 1st half white President named Barack Hussein Obama. (nice Christian name) Some posters inside Covers claim BOH was a unifier of the American people! That could not be further from the truth. Here is Megyn Kelly's cliff note opinion of Obama.
How dare you come to this site and push your agenda about rankings of presidents without mentioning historians and having colored fonts to enhance your viewpoint....you are lucky COVERS.com of Canada did not ban you and grind your left arm down into little pieces and make maple syrup of your right wing propagandist arse...and who the hell spells Megyn like that when everyone knows it is spelled Megan or sometimes Brandon!
You should be completely ashamed of yourself
It is just so blatant and in your face! These are people inside Covers who voted for a brain dead pedo! On top of that the Dems sole the election of 2020 through ballot harvesting and voting machines linked to Venezuela and China which switched votes from Trump to pedo Joe!
You can not possibly make this up on your best day! MAGA!
Here is an idea, post content meant to create discussion and not some lame podcast link. Here is another idea, try and stop yourself from the racist approach you made in the first sentence, that is why I moved the thread. You seem to post only to create drama not conversation. Last idea, when your thread is moved because of your content wait more than 15 minutes if at all to partisan whine about the site, your replies and constant themes are why your threads are moved.
If you want to provoke and post podcast bashing of partisan nature please take it elsewhere, it wont be allowed in the main forums and especially when you cannot refrain from your racist remarks.
@sundance
Well at least your consistent with your partisan complaining. Look at the threads you make, the posts you make it is just podcast links meant to provoke, there is no content there is no discussion you make threads to partisan retaliate and that serves zero purpose in the main forums. Try making posts that create discussion not just partisan links and then whine when I move those same never ending partisan podcast links because you do the same thing over and over to create drama and retaliate. If you do not like the threads where actual discussion happens because it is partisan then just stop entering those. There are many threads in that area for your partisan side just visit those you like and not the ones you do not. I have absolutely zero idea why you chose to make this thread, what does Obama being half white and not having a Christian name add value or create discussion? I would rather you not be racist and religiously narrow minded and make threads with content like this.
There are thousands of ultra conservative websites where you can interact with white folk who share your views like you stated here, Covers is for sure not an appropriate place for this or actually most of your thread creations of political content.
To be fair, there is an ongoing discussion in the Politics forum about the current president's ranking and historians, which is basically the same as this thread. Yes, there was mention of color being made, but subjective, at best, whether it was racists or not. The clip was an opinion of one persons take on a past president that had nothing to do with color but rather of a person asking a question of the one in the clip. There may have been an intent to take a stab here by the OP, but so are many threads currently in the Politics forum right now....mostly just digs happening at the shop next door...
And truthfully, there is a discussion taking place right now with 3 of us...how many more does there need to be to make an official discussion or content that is perceived as a discussion?
It may not be of content that you approve of, but it is certainly content that could be discussed if the site is going to allow the other posters to talk about rankings of a current president by historians when that president that everyone hates is not even yet history from the white house....just sayin...it's not necessarily tit for tat exactly....if this were a video talking trash about Trump I would venture to say that it would have stayed in the Politics forum because it falls in line....
Trump sucks
Obama sucked
Obamacare is vomit and most kind of got 
@sundance
Your comments about Obama being half white and a non Christian name if that were the one off MAYBE it might be ignored, maybe not but given your never ending partisan nonsense and issues with this topic no question it got moved and it should have.
I am not interested in tallies or quotas or comparisons or rationalizations that the two of you are failing at pushing forward, that has zero relevance and zero value. If you dislike a thread that is partisan and being critical of Trump then STAY OUT OF IT. There are many threads in the mains that do not interest me, I do not make a retort thread to retaliate or blow off steam and try to annoy, I just do not visit those threads I do not see a great need for. The same goes for you two, if you are not keen on a thread then skip to one you are aligned with.
I hope at some future point in your life that you will move away from the racist and partisan comments and thoughts and go find some sites that support your ultra conservative views where others like you can back slap partisan content, Covers is not really the place for biased partisan racist content.
And there it is...go find sites that support our ultra conservative views
That's exactly what is trying to be done....
The funny part is that you never see what you are doing and how you are handling yourself because it is allowed
And you keeping pushing me into a generalization narrative that is completely false which is comical for you and others...it's almost embarrassing....
I was simply playing devils advocate and saying that his thread is not any worse than some threads that are allowed to live in the box with content that is highly questionable, however this is moved...I mentioned that the color part may have been it, but nothing wrong with the thread other than that and certainly not to be moved for the purposes you stated...this could be a topic of discussion for some if you are allowing posts about the historical ranking of the devil trump to be made...jus sayin, it's not equal as you would make it out to be but you are certainly consistent with your agenda to silence certain people that do not align with your viewpoint...
Sad part is you are fooled by the political agenda you speak of and promote here...far more negative in politics than any positive and not sure where being conservative has to do with any of it that you speak of but you like to take digs anywhere you can even though you and others are so so wrong
@ABooksNightmare
I wasnt even addressing you but as usual you have to butt in and take your swipes so I addressed those faulty retorts too. In reality this site has a politics forum for conversation and discussion and to keep that sewer stuff out of the mains, that is all. The reason I replied to sundance is due to his issues, his posts, his threads and never ending partisan retaliation. You are NOT trying to find your spot on this site and isnt it curious how you claim to be an INDY but then throw yourself into the circle when I say ultra, which is EXACTLY what sundance is, I was not addressing you and yet here you are inserting yourself where you are not party to the discussion.
You resort to tally and quantity as an excuse to retaliate and create drama. The group you despise so much that is your retort base does one thing completely different than the other group (include yourself or not I dont care nor did I suggest it to be so, that was YOU as usual) that they keep to themselves they as a general group do not enter your threads and retort back to you or instigate or antagonize, they do not trail into the mains and stir up issues...one side does that over and over, the other does not. One side also is never racist or sexist or using religious tones like sundance does and did...THERE is your issue not this sloppy stupid partisan tit for tat nonsense.
You create drama in a severe way it is like you are completely unable to help yourself and must force yourself into other peoples business when you are not part of the conversation, not sure the purpose or value for doing so outside of the decades long attempt to stir up drama.
Right, because you didn't mention the two of us in your reply...
And I never addressed you so why are you talking to me....see how that works both ways, but it's only relevant for you, huh
I jumped in to support the fact that this thread was moved here and stated that there are plenty of threads in the political forum that remain while this thread gets moved...I said that it could have been because of the color being mentioned but odds are you would have moved anyway just like you do other threads that are posted by some....you aren't fair in that aspect and that is quite evident...nothing was wrong with this thread just like countless others and what may not be a discussion fro you could be a discussion for some....he is right in one regard, look at the threads in the politics area right now and many of those should have fallen in line with what you did here, moved them...my point is you do not generally move threads that you agree with...if this was a bashing Trump thread it would have stayed and that is fact because it is evident by the many threads that are posted up right now bashing the guy and making radical comments over and over day in and day out and nothing is said, yet you move an Obama thread where someone was talking about how they rated him....yet you allow the historical rating posts of Trump to go on and on and on and on and say nothing or move those threads...hmmmmmm, doesn't take a genius to figure out what is going on....you think we are stupid and don't notice what is taking place but we do and you hate the fact that you are called out on it...just admit to it and own it instead of acting you are doing justice for the site....you clearly are not and it's quite evident....just own it and move on and no one bothers you about it, but you prefer to hide behind what is fact and known based on supported evidence...
Nothing wrong with this thread and just because he mentioned half white is not racists at all....it's actually a fact so not sure how that is racists....the video said nothing about race either....thread should have stayed and so should have the one about Newsom that was moved to the box a month or two ago....own your take here and people would respect you more
Already stated why to the OP, maybe you didnt like the reason because it does not fall inside your partisan complaints but I cannot help you with that. If a thread has racist or sexist or derogatory portions, it CAN be moved...CAN be moved. This did and he does often thus when someone who has a history of repeated behavior that becomes more of a sticking point. All of this was explained above and is consistent with the site rules.
There is absolutely zero reason to make the half white comment as the lead there is no reason to throw the Christian comment in, those are just stacking the odds of a thread being moved and sundance has some issues himself with race it has happened before and his never ending retort thread creation is also a reason his get moved.
Show me where in the partisan blame complaining tit for tat threads that there is racist or religious content, then show me five and ten of those as that would support a pattern and a reason. No you cant and you wont so why waste my time beating a partisan drum that has no purpose or validity?
You dont like the other guys threads then quit going in them, nobody forces you and I actually have directly asked you to stop mixing it up with certain members because of your history. Try making non-partisan conversation and find reason to add value versus butting in to stir the pot as you do more than nearly any other member on this site, not speaking about politics alone either btw.
@ABooksNightmare
A loop means the past only, you troll and trail extensively, do you want to deny this? You did in this very thread. Post 5 was to the OP not you, post 7 was not to you so why make post 9 when this has zero to do with you?
I can point you to threads where you troll others if you would like, your loop comment is cute like you are a changed person or something, we both know that is not true but one thing is positively true your past is quite abhorrent and inappropriate but hey who cares lets ignore your stalking history because who wants accountability anyway?
So where are the examples deserving of thread moves, racist, sexist, religious biases, you know the rules that the site has? Stalking, trolling, repeated offenses? Where are your examples of actual rule abuses because I can find many of yours and others.
Who am I stalking
And when you say "the two of you" and the only two people in this thread are me and sundance and your royal highness in yourself, you were obviously talking to me so why do you deny it....that's your problem is not owning stuff you post and instead try to play it off like you are not...it's an old schtick...
my past is inappropriate....
....you are so categorically not right it's hilarious...you just didn't like the guys that I associated with here in the box...I would bet you couldn't name 3 or 4 things I ever did back then that is what you are ranting about over and over again...you categorized people which is your problem not my problem...go ahead and hate everyone I used to talk with in here, but the truth is if I was that person you claim I was then why do I still have an account here genius?
Keep on with your lame retorts and generalizations like you do because if I was breaking the rules then I would be banned, and yet I am not, but you make so many isolated threats it's funny...what is more sad is that COVERS allows you to do it, which is more a knock against them than you......you are not the gatekeeper of this site and I was here well before you ever became a poster and then a mod when it was wagerline...the problem is you let it go to your head and try to get under people...I know what you are doing and have known for some time....number one instigator is you, but you fly under the radar with your snide remarks and hate towards certain posters....you are the ultimate grudgemaster...
You are the biggest bully on this site and have been for years....you just get away with it because COVERS needs a bouncer like you...well, you are no Patrick Swayze and this ain't Roadhouse...you have your little magic mod button in mod chat, but I also know what goes on behind the scenes here or have you forgotten there is one little mouse that either is or became a mod and may have squealed on you....
Fight the power James Dalton and keep stoking the fires to rile people up like you do....you are the COVERS cooler 
The best quote of the day by you: "Try making non-partisan conversation and find reason to add value versus butting in to stir the pot as you do more than nearly any other member on this site, not speaking about politics alone either btw."
Every single poster butts in genius....that's what a forum is. People post things and others comment....this is not ta new concept, but if you really think it's butting in to make comments then you are just as guilty because there have been many times you butt in when you should not, so why not heed your own advice and not butt in??????
You are one strange beaver with your wallyworld rule sheet....keep moving the goal posts wally
@ABooksNightmare
You have never been successful at trying to ridicule me over all these years with the digs name calling and rude personal remarks, if anything it shows you have nothing on topic to say. You addressed zero of my comments or references to the site and your responsibility rather try and push off your past by saying I dont forget, you just want to do whatever you like and then it has no recourse.
You have not been banned because all mods here are very reasonable and tolerant to a fault. Have you done enough to be banned? Well of course you have without a doubt but the fact that you are NOT banned has zero to do with you being deserving of being banned. Sometimes we allow more than we should and in your case that for sure is the truth. There is a limit to what any member can do and no matter how long you have been on the site that is the case, I have been here as long as you as I was also at Wagerline and when the merge happened this account kept going but the longer account did not that I had at wagerline but who cares we both have been here 20 years and not sure what that has to do with anything. Even prior to me being a mod I would engage with bullies and people who try to intimidate as you do but the difference is I will only engage with actions, words and rules not making stupid childish names and try to elevate myself by putting you down personally as that does the exact opposite. You can be immature all you want and avoid the core of what I am saying by deflecting and going low but I will not.
I am still waiting for your examples of site rules being broken by the group you dislike, you know actual proof of your claim? Let me know when you can back up the inaccurate comparisons with regards to the rules the site has. I dont care which party you agree with or groups you agree with here, I will say again if one group is that difficult for you to watch then stop watching them and keep the rules, add value to conversation for everyone and try to make things better not poke at others and ridicule as you do.
Established in 1995,
I LOVE when the Canadians powertrip amongst each other...You guys should just Vaccinate each other and get naked. 
Hot Forum Topics
