BF II was on Titans over Zona so by rights I should of had 2 units on them . I put 1 unit at -8.5 was waiting for possible 9 but then forgot to put the other 1 unit.
I did have 2 units in king of covers contest
Week 1 Top 3 Performers.........
Packers off 3 ATS losses great spot to back these teams.
BF II was on Titans over Zona so by rights I should of had 2 units on them . I put 1 unit at -8.5 was waiting for possible 9 but then forgot to put the other 1 unit.
I did have 2 units in king of covers contest
Week 1 Top 3 Performers.........
Packers off 3 ATS losses great spot to back these teams.
@theclaw Man I have NYJ and Seattle as the same trend different spreads both bad spreads in my trackings so one shud lose but I'm not sure which one so staying off both love seeing your threads
Interesting. ..............
What I see on you tube is guys saying Seahawks covered valued but these guys don't use regression.
Books know regression and may be adjusting lines based on such.
I myself would never want to be on the side of a team off 26-0 and 44-10 wins. Just say no ......
@theclaw Man I have NYJ and Seattle as the same trend different spreads both bad spreads in my trackings so one shud lose but I'm not sure which one so staying off both love seeing your threads
Interesting. ..............
What I see on you tube is guys saying Seahawks covered valued but these guys don't use regression.
Books know regression and may be adjusting lines based on such.
I myself would never want to be on the side of a team off 26-0 and 44-10 wins. Just say no ......
In 2023 Vikings were 7-10 and Packers 9-8 so both teams showed good improvement especially considering Packers went 0-4 VS 2 teams well ahead of them in the year they were top 5 after 6 weeks. Lions were 12-5.
We should expect some nice improvements from these teams.
Of course only 1 year a small sample but . possible
In 2023 Vikings were 7-10 and Packers 9-8 so both teams showed good improvement especially considering Packers went 0-4 VS 2 teams well ahead of them in the year they were top 5 after 6 weeks. Lions were 12-5.
We should expect some nice improvements from these teams.
Of course only 1 year a small sample but . possible
FTN Fantasy (formerly Football Outsiders - a superior name IMHO) has SEA rated #1 in Team Total DVOA. DET and IND are tied at #2 and #3. LAR at #4 and there is a sizeable drop to KC at #5.
FTN Fantasy (formerly Football Outsiders - a superior name IMHO) has SEA rated #1 in Team Total DVOA. DET and IND are tied at #2 and #3. LAR at #4 and there is a sizeable drop to KC at #5.
FTN Fantasy (formerly Football Outsiders - a superior name IMHO) has SEA rated #1 in Team Total DVOA. DET and IND are tied at #2 and #3. LAR at #4 and there is a sizeable drop to KC at #5. https://ftnfantasy.com/stats/nfl/team-total-dvoa
FTN Fantasy (formerly Football Outsiders - a superior name IMHO) has SEA rated #1 in Team Total DVOA. DET and IND are tied at #2 and #3. LAR at #4 and there is a sizeable drop to KC at #5. https://ftnfantasy.com/stats/nfl/team-total-dvoa
I looked up the top 5 pts per plays margin after 6 weeks back to 2015 but not the 2 covid years 2020 & 21.
I eliminated the teams from the same division in top 5. 1 of those teams won the division every time.
Of the remaining 31 teams 24 went on to win the division or 77.4% of the time.
There was only 1 bad year produced a losing record, that was 2016, 2-3 overall but after eliminating Bills & Pats in same division (Pats won division ) finished 1-2.
The year before 2015 went 4-1 and the year after went 5-0.
Past 4 season not counting covid years 10-3 or 76.9% so very consistent at winning division.
This season we do have 2 teams from same division, Colts and Texans . However Texans only have 5 games and are coming in off regression type play.
I like to see more from them at this point, rules of regression are team must regress first to get true strength of the team.
I will take the Lions though as I already have Packers but I have to take them especially with Packers still the favorite for division title.
Could be injuries why they aren't playing well.
But Lions seem like a great price at +160.
Lions to win division +160 --- 1 unit to win 1.6 units
I looked up the top 5 pts per plays margin after 6 weeks back to 2015 but not the 2 covid years 2020 & 21.
I eliminated the teams from the same division in top 5. 1 of those teams won the division every time.
Of the remaining 31 teams 24 went on to win the division or 77.4% of the time.
There was only 1 bad year produced a losing record, that was 2016, 2-3 overall but after eliminating Bills & Pats in same division (Pats won division ) finished 1-2.
The year before 2015 went 4-1 and the year after went 5-0.
Past 4 season not counting covid years 10-3 or 76.9% so very consistent at winning division.
This season we do have 2 teams from same division, Colts and Texans . However Texans only have 5 games and are coming in off regression type play.
I like to see more from them at this point, rules of regression are team must regress first to get true strength of the team.
I will take the Lions though as I already have Packers but I have to take them especially with Packers still the favorite for division title.
Could be injuries why they aren't playing well.
But Lions seem like a great price at +160.
Lions to win division +160 --- 1 unit to win 1.6 units
Another thing ....... I already talked about how teams over .200 cannot sustain such high level play unless they are one of the truly great teams all-time.
Colts at .224.
Last season Vikings at .250 and they fell way off that but year end.
6 such teams, did these teams Peak to Early ???
Of these 6 teams 4 won division but 1 year 2023 both Bills and Dolphins over .200. Crazy they tied for divsion title with Bills winning on tiebreaker.
Do you know how many games these 6 teams won ATS in playoffs ??
Exactly 1, it does appear they did peak to early.
3 of the 6 lost SU in 1st playoff game.
2023 9ers first after 6 weeks at .259, 2cd best of any team in that span did make the SB but went 0-3 ATS.
The best team, crazy as it sounds was Pats at a whopping 313- well ahead of 2cd best 9ers , first year after Brady was with Mac Jones best I remember.
But only to lose 1st playoff game to Titans 20-13.
Another thing ....... I already talked about how teams over .200 cannot sustain such high level play unless they are one of the truly great teams all-time.
Colts at .224.
Last season Vikings at .250 and they fell way off that but year end.
6 such teams, did these teams Peak to Early ???
Of these 6 teams 4 won division but 1 year 2023 both Bills and Dolphins over .200. Crazy they tied for divsion title with Bills winning on tiebreaker.
Do you know how many games these 6 teams won ATS in playoffs ??
Exactly 1, it does appear they did peak to early.
3 of the 6 lost SU in 1st playoff game.
2023 9ers first after 6 weeks at .259, 2cd best of any team in that span did make the SB but went 0-3 ATS.
The best team, crazy as it sounds was Pats at a whopping 313- well ahead of 2cd best 9ers , first year after Brady was with Mac Jones best I remember.
But only to lose 1st playoff game to Titans 20-13.
If we look for example at last season, Vikes first at .250 but they finish like .129. Big decline, if we eliminate those first 6 weeks they are well under .129 in the remaing 11 games.
And they get hammered by Rams in WC playoff game 27-9.
While Bills at .158 3rd best after 6 weeks improves to the best team about .182. So if we eliminate those first 6 weeks Bills better then .182.
And Bills win both SU & ATS in their first 2 playoff games only then to lose to KC as they normally do.
So as far as the Colts go, if they can austain such play then they might make good playoff team to back.
I need to see how all teams did whether they improve or decline and by how much if there is any correlation to playoff failure or success.
2019 Pats at .313 fell to 4th at .146, huge drop-off before losing in 1st playoff game.
If we look for example at last season, Vikes first at .250 but they finish like .129. Big decline, if we eliminate those first 6 weeks they are well under .129 in the remaing 11 games.
And they get hammered by Rams in WC playoff game 27-9.
While Bills at .158 3rd best after 6 weeks improves to the best team about .182. So if we eliminate those first 6 weeks Bills better then .182.
And Bills win both SU & ATS in their first 2 playoff games only then to lose to KC as they normally do.
So as far as the Colts go, if they can austain such play then they might make good playoff team to back.
I need to see how all teams did whether they improve or decline and by how much if there is any correlation to playoff failure or success.
2019 Pats at .313 fell to 4th at .146, huge drop-off before losing in 1st playoff game.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.