week 6

    f)  Play on an away dog whose present opponent will be at least a 7 point underdog their next game....365-214-21, 63%, (+4.0).....ON Titans.....if that away dog  is off an away dog win this moves to 28-12 ATS.......ON Titans

Raiders lookahead line next week at KC is +10.

The 3rd road game in a row within my query is relevant to me. 

this situation relevance is not present in your query.  

just one of those games we oppose each other. 

x

I am not opposing you, and I appreciate your contributions....however you said "I don't know what convinced you........." and it was in my thread in detail  as it always is, the rationale behind what I do. 

I wouldn't play Tennessee if there was a 50-0 angle supporting them....and I may still play the Raiders, but it has given me some trepidation should I decide to go forward....I won't have it on my listed plays regardless.

Good fortune with your plays.

The one thing I would ask should you come onto my thread(s), is that you or other query-heads  explain the parameters of your query so that those who don't use killersports or any other databases know what the abbreviations mean.

  g)  A team that has had the sequence home dog win, away loss, and now a home favorite of more than a point has gone 34-73-2 (-3.1)......VERSUS Chiefs.......if their opponent is off an away win this moves to 0-11 ATS (-12.5), 2-9 straight up (-8.1)

pp:HDW and p:AL and HF and line < -1 and op:AW

  h)  A divisional away favorite with at least four wins, off their first loss of the year their previous game, 3-6 ATS (-4.7), 3-6 straight up......VERSUS Eagles.

  i)  A dog of less than 13 points with a win/loss record of 0-5 off a sequence of away loss, home loss has been 13-3 ATS (+3.4), 7-9 straight up (-3.5).......ON Jets

t:wins=0 and t:losses=5 and D and line<13 and p:HL and pp:AL  

Plays:  

Adding:

1)  Seahawks pik

2)  Lions +2

_____________________________________

3)  Browns +5

4)  Chargers -4

DELETED Cardinals due to Murray injury uncertainty.

I am not opposing you, and I appreciate your contributions....however you said "I don't know what convinced you........." and it was in my thread in detail  as it always is, the rationale behind what I do. 

yea ok.  obviously I skimmed thru some of your posts.  I just happened to see your small detailed post about deleting the Raiders and that caught my eye and attention. Thus not being up to par with everything you post. 

———————————-

The one thing I would ask should you come onto my thread(s), is that you or other query-heads  explain the parameters of your query so that those who don't use killersports or any other databases know what the abbreviations mean.

No that’s ok.  I don’t feel it’s necessary to feed others the details that most are not congruent with.  I prefer only speaking to you.  I have better things to do.  If you are dead set on this I’ll just refrain from contributing further in your threads.  

Best wishes as always 

heres an alost 100@ stat teams that lose by 1point are failing next game dogs especially n how can you back a team that was winning 21-6 

i call it the runover games team is up by 17 + points losses other team that made huge come back loses next game 

schedule traps happen team beats cluster fawks 2 in row browns n saints  themn home game vs a team that'snot bad 4 n 6 record could be any nfl team n they are small 3.5 fav get demolised 

stat on titans every year they are worst team in 4 th quarter - 17 % or whatever they call it 

they srted out 0-4 1-3 ats n this is 3rd str8 roadie 

but dunno raiders with petey caroll so far are lame losing  4 str8 weeks s/u n ats 

n def LA to rival Chiefs 

  j)  A home team before week 10, who has won their last three games at home, won their previous game at home and their present opponent lost their previous game at home.....13-27 ATS (-5.5), 23-18 straight up (+1.3).....VERSUS Colts, Jaguars

If that home team that won their last three home games won their last game as a home dog, this has been either 1-8 or 2-7 ATS depending on whether you use gimmethedog or killersports as your source......VERSUS Jags

tS(W@H, N=3)=3 and p:HDW and H and week < 10 and op:HL

Here are the numbers for teams off a loss by one point.

  a)  away loss, now away 31-22 ATS

  b)  home loss, now away 48-48 ATS.....relevant to Cardinals this week

  c)  home loss, now home 19-25 ATS

  d)  away loss, now home 54-66 ATS

Looks like home teams have slightly underperformed off a close 1 point loss, but NOT away teams.

p:L and p:margin=-1 and site and p:site and playoffs=0 and n:playoffs=0

Cardinals have 29% of bettors on them this week, which is precisely one reason why we'd consider them....those teams with less than 35% of the public on them went either 4-1 or 5-1 last week depending on your source.......if 4% of the public are winners, it is a winning strategy to play on those teams that everyone says,..."how can you consider betting on THAT team?"

From what I can understand of this it's simply not true. No where near 100% more around 60%

Dam Indigo why did you have to put ( J ) in there I kind of like both those teams, but I'm still up in the air.

  k)  A divisional home favorite before week 9 that has at least an average total yards deficit of -50 yards/game.....72-93-4 ATS (-1.1),.....if they are favored less than 7 points this moves to 55-74 ATS....and if their next game is on Thursday it moves to 1-5-1 ATS (-4.0), 3-4 straight up (-2.0).....VERSUS Steelers

@Indigo999

 Heard on radio, chargers have lots of injuries…