Dallas is always a sucker bet. If the line was produced on how wellthe teams are playing, SD would of been a favourite.
Considering its the Dallas Cowgirls, 'America's team' the public favourite. Taking them Cowgirls by the spread is usually a 'sucker bet' because their are a public favourite.
And you said San Diego was a public favourite? Howcome the line went from -3 to -3.5? Because the betting was on the Cowboys. You will never see the line move opposite the Cowboys, ever.
This was not a sucker bet at all. Simply put, the science of the SD passing game vs. the Dallas secondary, following the obvious december trend made this a 'Lock' bet.
Dallas is always a sucker bet. If the line was produced on how wellthe teams are playing, SD would of been a favourite.
Considering its the Dallas Cowgirls, 'America's team' the public favourite. Taking them Cowgirls by the spread is usually a 'sucker bet' because their are a public favourite.
And you said San Diego was a public favourite? Howcome the line went from -3 to -3.5? Because the betting was on the Cowboys. You will never see the line move opposite the Cowboys, ever.
This was not a sucker bet at all. Simply put, the science of the SD passing game vs. the Dallas secondary, following the obvious december trend made this a 'Lock' bet.
[Quote: Originally Posted by burley] hands up nba cappers who had the lakers to beat utah and got the 2 points as a dog line? well i am sure 8/10 of you had them as a value play. why not throw a few bucks on the hot lakers and i get +2 to boot. fact is vegas cleaned up with utah winning from start to finish. more than 80% of the public were on the lakeshow. there is a correlation to this week's sucker bet as i am going to bank on vegas for this selection the same way i played the utah jazz tonight. i have a 7-0 ats record going since posting here, not including ml and teaser winnings. in demapples fashion for this pick i am going with what he would play or i think what he would play. though i did bet this at -3 and not where it currently stands at 3' it is a risky bet and have a few other games on the go that i also think is worthwhile value.
the sucker bet this week is for joe public to bet on the san diego chargers. so the play is dallas -3' ...although truthfully the wise thing to do is to buy this down to 3 as the chargers seem to do well against the nfc east.
this is the top bet game at s insight..74% spread and 76% looking for dog money payout. is vegas and ovs books stupid enough to hand over free money in turn started giving you +150 for chargers su and now has blossomed to ver +167? i am sure there are the same bettors taking the +167 now who got in earlier. also there is reverse line movement with the volume of bets and now wants to give you an extra half point. there are reasons why i am very sure that san diego loses this one although they might be within a fg. for one dallas will more than likely lose next week otr against the saints. secondly at the same time a key playoff bye battle ensues next week with the chargers playing the bengals. knowing that dallas loses next week they should ensure at least one more week of sitting on the top perch in the nfc east.
as always bet small. gambling for profit is a journey not a race. this is a risky pick, but i am not putting all my eggs in this basket. my covers 7-0 ats is a bit in jeopardy with a risky venture like this one, but in demapples absence i think i did him proud with this one [/Q
HEY, how many licks did it take you to get to the middle ???
[Quote: Originally Posted by burley] hands up nba cappers who had the lakers to beat utah and got the 2 points as a dog line? well i am sure 8/10 of you had them as a value play. why not throw a few bucks on the hot lakers and i get +2 to boot. fact is vegas cleaned up with utah winning from start to finish. more than 80% of the public were on the lakeshow. there is a correlation to this week's sucker bet as i am going to bank on vegas for this selection the same way i played the utah jazz tonight. i have a 7-0 ats record going since posting here, not including ml and teaser winnings. in demapples fashion for this pick i am going with what he would play or i think what he would play. though i did bet this at -3 and not where it currently stands at 3' it is a risky bet and have a few other games on the go that i also think is worthwhile value.
the sucker bet this week is for joe public to bet on the san diego chargers. so the play is dallas -3' ...although truthfully the wise thing to do is to buy this down to 3 as the chargers seem to do well against the nfc east.
this is the top bet game at s insight..74% spread and 76% looking for dog money payout. is vegas and ovs books stupid enough to hand over free money in turn started giving you +150 for chargers su and now has blossomed to ver +167? i am sure there are the same bettors taking the +167 now who got in earlier. also there is reverse line movement with the volume of bets and now wants to give you an extra half point. there are reasons why i am very sure that san diego loses this one although they might be within a fg. for one dallas will more than likely lose next week otr against the saints. secondly at the same time a key playoff bye battle ensues next week with the chargers playing the bengals. knowing that dallas loses next week they should ensure at least one more week of sitting on the top perch in the nfc east.
as always bet small. gambling for profit is a journey not a race. this is a risky pick, but i am not putting all my eggs in this basket. my covers 7-0 ats is a bit in jeopardy with a risky venture like this one, but in demapples absence i think i did him proud with this one [/Q
HEY, how many licks did it take you to get to the middle ???
HAHAHAHA!!!! you took Dallas LAYING points in December? Nice pick man. SD was the easiest play I had yesterday, never in doubt. Keep the fade material coming.
HAHAHAHA!!!! you took Dallas LAYING points in December? Nice pick man. SD was the easiest play I had yesterday, never in doubt. Keep the fade material coming.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.