appreciate the info
![]()
![]()
![]()
Opps there it is ..............![]()
Dogs rolling in early games. What 5-2 ATS i think.
PR II BF -- 3-0 ATS
teams in the first game of regression go to 6-2 ATS.
Titans in the 2cd game.
Opps there it is ..............![]()
Dogs rolling in early games. What 5-2 ATS i think.
PR II BF -- 3-0 ATS
teams in the first game of regression go to 6-2 ATS.
Titans in the 2cd game.
I nabbed TEN +10/-112 for 1.5 units at Heritage. Thanks for your agreement and congratulations.
I nabbed TEN +10/-112 for 1.5 units at Heritage. Thanks for your agreement and congratulations.
Thanks for posting that information even though I did not act on it.
It's still nice to know and it does support the fact that the general public usually loses.
Thanks for posting that information even though I did not act on it.
It's still nice to know and it does support the fact that the general public usually loses.
![]()
![]()
Yep , even the better sports bettors who might enter that contest when they all want to lineup on the same team is usually from overreaction to recent games.
Yep , even the better sports bettors who might enter that contest when they all want to lineup on the same team is usually from overreaction to recent games.
Week --- 2-2, won .32 units
Power Rating BF was spectacular again this week....... 4-1 ATS after going 3-1 last week.
As normally I don't like betting the first week of regression with this method but some years do very well and so far this year not many teams losing first week.
My other system lost with fade on Rams to go 6-5 ATS. This method should go on a run at some point we stay the course with the info.
Much like I pointed out we saw a reversal for many teams in week 9. Just crazy how it comes at this time of year every year.
Big dogs rolled ATS with 2 winning SU.
Colts with a .272 pts per plays margin the best in the past 17 years as of Nov 1st regressed big time. With 6 TO's.
I missed the boat on that game, not very likely Colts could sustain that level of play and as crazy as it is the first game of the 2cd half is when they regressed. Crazy but happens every year.
PR II had Steelers winning by 8.4 pts but only because of those 6 TO's.
Colts did outplay Steelers pretty much in every other area. Steelers needed 6 TO's to win by only 7 pts.
Colts drop to 2cd .216
Seahawks roll and take over 1st place. Now we have 2 teams over .200, not likely either team will finish above .200 by seasons end. Not impossible but not very likely.
Week --- 2-2, won .32 units
Power Rating BF was spectacular again this week....... 4-1 ATS after going 3-1 last week.
As normally I don't like betting the first week of regression with this method but some years do very well and so far this year not many teams losing first week.
My other system lost with fade on Rams to go 6-5 ATS. This method should go on a run at some point we stay the course with the info.
Much like I pointed out we saw a reversal for many teams in week 9. Just crazy how it comes at this time of year every year.
Big dogs rolled ATS with 2 winning SU.
Colts with a .272 pts per plays margin the best in the past 17 years as of Nov 1st regressed big time. With 6 TO's.
I missed the boat on that game, not very likely Colts could sustain that level of play and as crazy as it is the first game of the 2cd half is when they regressed. Crazy but happens every year.
PR II had Steelers winning by 8.4 pts but only because of those 6 TO's.
Colts did outplay Steelers pretty much in every other area. Steelers needed 6 TO's to win by only 7 pts.
Colts drop to 2cd .216
Seahawks roll and take over 1st place. Now we have 2 teams over .200, not likely either team will finish above .200 by seasons end. Not impossible but not very likely.
Beautiful both my favorite regression teams this season lost SU.
Wash and KC.
Wash obviously not the same team, my regression metrics was right on the money.
KC needs 1 more loss to hit my first under season wins play on KC. And 2 more losses to hit my 2cd under season wins play.
With a very good batch of teams coming up I think it is very unlikely KC wont lose at least 1 game.
Colts game will be interesting, I think you have to back Colts or no play.
I did hit the Bills TT over 26.5 before the start of the 4th quarter. The score landed about right on what I thought it could , calling a 27-20 Bills win or 27-24.
Beautiful both my favorite regression teams this season lost SU.
Wash and KC.
Wash obviously not the same team, my regression metrics was right on the money.
KC needs 1 more loss to hit my first under season wins play on KC. And 2 more losses to hit my 2cd under season wins play.
With a very good batch of teams coming up I think it is very unlikely KC wont lose at least 1 game.
Colts game will be interesting, I think you have to back Colts or no play.
I did hit the Bills TT over 26.5 before the start of the 4th quarter. The score landed about right on what I thought it could , calling a 27-20 Bills win or 27-24.
        
    
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.