Other system ......... 3-2 ATS Bills -7.5 over Pats--- 1.1 units I don't think this gets to 7. Line has been going back up from what I saw. Regression play ......... Bengals +10.5 over Lions --- .55 units

Yea, Bengals look pathetic while Lions look like world-beaters, very good spot to back the Bengals ................
Yea, Bengals look pathetic while Lions look like world-beaters, very good spot to back the Bengals ................
Other system ..............3-2
Eagles -4 over Broncos --- .55 units
I hate to back this Eagles team but the method does call for a fade on the Broncos so I have to take it.
Was some -3.5 but now I see -4.5's and -4 so doubtful it would have gotten down to -3.
Other system ..............3-2
Eagles -4 over Broncos --- .55 units
I hate to back this Eagles team but the method does call for a fade on the Broncos so I have to take it.
Was some -3.5 but now I see -4.5's and -4 so doubtful it would have gotten down to -3.
Best of luck, but the game simply does not pass the eye test. Cleveland has shut teams down, especially the run. This includes Cincy. The Lions ran all over Cleveland last week. The Lions are tops in scoring and Bengals defense are 30th. I feel the Lions will run roughshod. I don't think Cincy can score with the Lions. The Lions pass rush looked great last week.
Best of luck, but the game simply does not pass the eye test. Cleveland has shut teams down, especially the run. This includes Cincy. The Lions ran all over Cleveland last week. The Lions are tops in scoring and Bengals defense are 30th. I feel the Lions will run roughshod. I don't think Cincy can score with the Lions. The Lions pass rush looked great last week.
All very true ...............
However that's not how it always works. Lions have KC on deck then the Bucs and they just beat-up Browns.
This is a spot they very well could come out very flat as it is too easy for them to beat Bengals and they don't need much motivation to do it and with KC on deck no point in hurting themselves this week.
This is why sports betting is not easy.
All very true ...............
However that's not how it always works. Lions have KC on deck then the Bucs and they just beat-up Browns.
This is a spot they very well could come out very flat as it is too easy for them to beat Bengals and they don't need much motivation to do it and with KC on deck no point in hurting themselves this week.
This is why sports betting is not easy.
According to PR II the 9ers should of beat the Rams by .54 of a point.
In other words a very close game and as it turns out it was a close down-to-the-wire game either team could of won.
Interesting that when PR II says a team should win by less then 4 pts they actually win only 3 of 12 games or 3-9 SU.
But when they should win by 4 pts or more they have actually won 47 of 52 games. Or 47-5.
That is most likely better then normal of PR II. Since I never track it I don't really know but I am aware of it to some degree.
By year's end most playoff teams play on the field will be within 4 pts of their margin of victory.
So in other words each teams play on the field and their margin of victory will even out over time.
Some teams get way ahead in either play on the field or margin of victory but that is not sustainable longer term.
A teams margin of victory has to be within reason of the teams play on the field.
MY OTHER SYSTEM is based on this regression and play on the field and margin of victory evening out .
Just wanted to point this out as it is not some simple trend .
According to PR II the 9ers should of beat the Rams by .54 of a point.
In other words a very close game and as it turns out it was a close down-to-the-wire game either team could of won.
Interesting that when PR II says a team should win by less then 4 pts they actually win only 3 of 12 games or 3-9 SU.
But when they should win by 4 pts or more they have actually won 47 of 52 games. Or 47-5.
That is most likely better then normal of PR II. Since I never track it I don't really know but I am aware of it to some degree.
By year's end most playoff teams play on the field will be within 4 pts of their margin of victory.
So in other words each teams play on the field and their margin of victory will even out over time.
Some teams get way ahead in either play on the field or margin of victory but that is not sustainable longer term.
A teams margin of victory has to be within reason of the teams play on the field.
MY OTHER SYSTEM is based on this regression and play on the field and margin of victory evening out .
Just wanted to point this out as it is not some simple trend .
The Bounce Factor ...........
Titans +8.5 ...... 1 unit play
Bucs +3.5 .........1 unit play
Other system .............
Bills +7.5 .......... .5 unit play
Eagles -4 .......... .5 unit play
Regression play ........
Bengals +10.5 .......... .5 unit play
The Bounce Factor ...........
Titans +8.5 ...... 1 unit play
Bucs +3.5 .........1 unit play
Other system .............
Bills +7.5 .......... .5 unit play
Eagles -4 .......... .5 unit play
Regression play ........
Bengals +10.5 .......... .5 unit play
Top 5 Pts per Plays Margin ................
1. Seahawks .226
2. Lion's .177
3. Ravens .159
4. Colts .149
5. Vikings. .107
6. Broncos .106... missed by a whisker
With Bills, Wash, Eagles,Packers rounding out the top 10.
Highly likely at least 3 of the top 5 will make the playoffs
And could be 4 of the top 5 so if you are considering and futures plays this info possibly could help.
Top 5 Pts per Plays Margin ................
1. Seahawks .226
2. Lion's .177
3. Ravens .159
4. Colts .149
5. Vikings. .107
6. Broncos .106... missed by a whisker
With Bills, Wash, Eagles,Packers rounding out the top 10.
Highly likely at least 3 of the top 5 will make the playoffs
And could be 4 of the top 5 so if you are considering and futures plays this info possibly could help.
@theclaw
Thankyou for posting consistently I appreciate it
One question bc my info is pointing to Cin Bengals +14 this week
since Cincy didn't cover the +10 this week are they still in regression mode even tho they scored 24 points?
i hope you're still liking Cincy this week
@theclaw
Thankyou for posting consistently I appreciate it
One question bc my info is pointing to Cin Bengals +14 this week
since Cincy didn't cover the +10 this week are they still in regression mode even tho they scored 24 points?
i hope you're still liking Cincy this week
I'll have all this as week goes on once I break-down all the games.......................
Remember, what I said was Bengals are close to a regression play but they missed by only a small amount. As was Lions close as a fade.
And I said if I wanted to stay disciplined I would pass on that game.
So Bengals did not fit regression perfectly the way I measure it. I'll have to go over the game and see if they do fit this coming week.
I'll have all this as week goes on once I break-down all the games.......................
Remember, what I said was Bengals are close to a regression play but they missed by only a small amount. As was Lions close as a fade.
And I said if I wanted to stay disciplined I would pass on that game.
So Bengals did not fit regression perfectly the way I measure it. I'll have to go over the game and see if they do fit this coming week.
week --- 2-3, won .35 units
last week --- 4-3, won .35 units
Season --- 9-12, lost 2.95 units
The Bounce Factor does it again ................2-0
My other system 0-2........
I did talk about this method coming off strong play is the time it could lose but after 2 losing weeks I up my plays to 1 unit.
Even off a .500 week I could up my plays. Last year this method didn't lose back-to-back weeks once but did having losing record and a .500 record then one of those it produced the best record of the season the following week.
This is pretty much how this method goes after charting it for like 20 years or so.
So I am not overly surprised to see an 0-2 record because it was bound to happen after a 7-2 run weeks 2 and 3 when I didn't make any plays, then 3-2 last week, 10-4 in those 3 weeks.
I trust this method , just need to be patient the wins will come.
week --- 2-3, won .35 units
last week --- 4-3, won .35 units
Season --- 9-12, lost 2.95 units
The Bounce Factor does it again ................2-0
My other system 0-2........
I did talk about this method coming off strong play is the time it could lose but after 2 losing weeks I up my plays to 1 unit.
Even off a .500 week I could up my plays. Last year this method didn't lose back-to-back weeks once but did having losing record and a .500 record then one of those it produced the best record of the season the following week.
This is pretty much how this method goes after charting it for like 20 years or so.
So I am not overly surprised to see an 0-2 record because it was bound to happen after a 7-2 run weeks 2 and 3 when I didn't make any plays, then 3-2 last week, 10-4 in those 3 weeks.
I trust this method , just need to be patient the wins will come.
Bengals were not any official regression play as I talked about but they did hang in there down 11 twice.
Once the score was set at 11 instead of 10 I pretty much expected a loss. I did consider buying it to 11 , wow that would have been brutal with the safety with what, 5 seconds left.
Bengals were not any official regression play as I talked about but they did hang in there down 11 twice.
Once the score was set at 11 instead of 10 I pretty much expected a loss. I did consider buying it to 11 , wow that would have been brutal with the safety with what, 5 seconds left.
@theclaw
Thankyou for your response
for me GB is giving too many points in the trend that I have them in
my trends are only for the last 2 years tho
@theclaw
Thankyou for your response
for me GB is giving too many points in the trend that I have them in
my trends are only for the last 2 years tho
Those look ahead don’t move these guys nearly as much as college, I’d stop using that. The Bills lost because people get lethargic when 4-0 to 5-0 in the NFL. And they are suspect especially against a division team that was a bad spot for Buffalo. The NFL is about bad spots for good teams and good teams off losses. That’s what I look for. Injuries are also key.
Those look ahead don’t move these guys nearly as much as college, I’d stop using that. The Bills lost because people get lethargic when 4-0 to 5-0 in the NFL. And they are suspect especially against a division team that was a bad spot for Buffalo. The NFL is about bad spots for good teams and good teams off losses. That’s what I look for. Injuries are also key.
Yea has to be Bengals or nobody play ..........
Yea has to be Bengals or nobody play ..........
Yep ...........
KC 0-3 in close 1 score games this year after being 11-0 last year.
They can't win a close game to save their life.
Yep ...........
KC 0-3 in close 1 score games this year after being 11-0 last year.
They can't win a close game to save their life.
Hey, hey, hey people.......KC now needs to win 11 of the final 12 games to go OVER 12.5 wins .
Will they do it ?
They need to win 10 of final 12 games to go OVER 11.5 wins this season.
Will they do this ?
Feeling pretty good right now about those 2 futures plays but Mahomes, Ried and Spags can't be counted out just yet.
One more loss though in the next few games would be great.
How about this week losing to the Lions which is a very real possibility.
I highly doubt they'd win 11 straight.
Hey, hey, hey people.......KC now needs to win 11 of the final 12 games to go OVER 12.5 wins .
Will they do it ?
They need to win 10 of final 12 games to go OVER 11.5 wins this season.
Will they do this ?
Feeling pretty good right now about those 2 futures plays but Mahomes, Ried and Spags can't be counted out just yet.
One more loss though in the next few games would be great.
How about this week losing to the Lions which is a very real possibility.
I highly doubt they'd win 11 straight.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.