All Forums | NFL Betting

MONDAY NFL 3 OF THE MANY REASONS TO TAKE

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2018
Posts: 35
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 252
Posted: #26
Quote Originally Posted by bpickin:

The public was on Eagles 

So what?  You think the public never wins?  Just because more tickets were written for Philly doesn't mean more $ was wagered on them.  Books don't care about the "public".  They adjust the lines based on $ wagered.  They'll gladly pay out the 1000's of "public" bettors if they gain more money from the "sharps" losing.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1993
Posted: #27
vegas got raped yesterday?
they cleaned up on 
browns
jags
panthers
raiders
cowboys
they did just fine!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 173
Posted: #28

Quote Originally Posted by bpickin:

MAYBE I SHOUKD HAVE INCLUDED THE UNDER IN MY HEADING, but I wouldn't know what the reasoning would be other then I think it stays under

 

You wouldn't know why YOU think it will stay under?

 

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 13189
Posted: #29
[Quote: Originally Posted by stat13]

So what?  You think the public never wins?  Just because more tickets were written for Philly doesn't mean more $ was wagered on them.  Books don't care about the "public".  They adjust the lines based on $ wagered.  They'll gladly pay out the 1000's of "public" bettors if they gain more money from the "sharps" losing.
[/Quote


I WAS SAYING THAT BECASUE YOU SAID MAJPRITY WAS ON GIANTS.   THE MAJORITY WAS NOT ON GIANTS
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 252
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by bpickin:

Quote Originally Posted by stat13:


So what?  You think the public never wins?  Just because more tickets were written for Philly doesn't mean more $ was wagered on them.  Books don't care about the "public".  They adjust the lines based on $ wagered.  They'll gladly pay out the 1000's of "public" bettors if they gain more money from the "sharps" losing.
[/Quote


I WAS SAYING THAT BECASUE YOU SAID MAJPRITY WAS ON GIANTS.   THE MAJORITY WAS NOT ON GIANTS

I said the majority of MONEY was on the Giants.  Go back and read it again.  I couldn't have made it any more clear for you but obviously you don't comprehend what you read.

There could be 10,000 "public" bets on Philly and one "sharp" bet on the Giants, but if that sharp bet more MONEY on the Giants than all the Philly bets combined the books will need PHILLY.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 13189
Posted: #31
WHY IS THE MONEY LINE ONLY -185 on a 3.5 favorite?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 6868
Posted: #32
Rams 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1993
Posted: #33
ml seems right to me on-3.5 fav
not sure what you think it should be
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 13189
Posted: #34
I was thinking at least -200, maybe I'm wrong
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1993
Posted: #35
every line is see next week -3ish is also -180
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.