Paul cites Isaiah 45:23 to say that at the feet of Jesus every knee will bow and every tongue confess the Jesus is the Lord to the glory of God the Father.
Smooth is such a typical modern christian.......he listens to the likes of joel osteen and thinks the rabbi, pope and imam are all hugging in this group of godly love
smooth is either ignorant or a hypocrite.
Paul cites Isaiah 45:23 to say that at the feet of Jesus every knee will bow and every tongue confess the Jesus is the Lord to the glory of God the Father.
Smooth is such a typical modern christian.......he listens to the likes of joel osteen and thinks the rabbi, pope and imam are all hugging in this group of godly love
smooth is either ignorant or a hypocrite.
[/Quote
your quote is "there is no difference between god's"...... it shows you are either ignorant or a hypocrite.
while i have respect for atheists, i prefer deists and agnostics.....
[/Quote
your quote is "there is no difference between god's"...... it shows you are either ignorant or a hypocrite.
while i have respect for atheists, i prefer deists and agnostics.....
You are still showing that you are wet between the ears. ..lol
Where have I said what I posted previously about the first cause argument was my work?
If you go back to pg. 208 post #5178 this is what I clearly said to inform anyone who read what I posted:
(The most famous of all arguments for the existence of God are the "five ways" of Saint Thomas Aquinas.
One of the five ways, the fifth, is the argument from design and the other four are versions of the first-cause argument.)
So I clearly posted that the first cause argument was the work of Saint Thomas Aquinas. So in essence I wasn't stealing anything and making it look that it originated from me. C'mon wake up dude! Are you having trouble comprehending what you are reading?...lol
I have been posting a lot of passages from the bible also...do I ever say it is coming from me?...well of course not, it is coming from the Lord, because the bible is the Word of God.
So am I plagiarizing the Lord too? Well of course not.
I'm just stating what He has said which is written in the bible like for example whoever believes and accepts Jesus Christ as their Lord Savior and repents their sins will be allowed to enter God's Kingdom of Heaven and spend eternity in paradise.
You are still showing that you are wet between the ears. ..lol
Where have I said what I posted previously about the first cause argument was my work?
If you go back to pg. 208 post #5178 this is what I clearly said to inform anyone who read what I posted:
(The most famous of all arguments for the existence of God are the "five ways" of Saint Thomas Aquinas.
One of the five ways, the fifth, is the argument from design and the other four are versions of the first-cause argument.)
So I clearly posted that the first cause argument was the work of Saint Thomas Aquinas. So in essence I wasn't stealing anything and making it look that it originated from me. C'mon wake up dude! Are you having trouble comprehending what you are reading?...lol
I have been posting a lot of passages from the bible also...do I ever say it is coming from me?...well of course not, it is coming from the Lord, because the bible is the Word of God.
So am I plagiarizing the Lord too? Well of course not.
I'm just stating what He has said which is written in the bible like for example whoever believes and accepts Jesus Christ as their Lord Savior and repents their sins will be allowed to enter God's Kingdom of Heaven and spend eternity in paradise.
You are still showing that you are wet between the ears. ..lol
Where have I said what I posted previously about the first cause argument was my work?
If you go back to pg. 208 post #5178 this is what I clearly said to inform anyone who read what I posted:
(The most famous of all arguments for the existence of God are the "five ways" of Saint Thomas Aquinas.
One of the five ways, the fifth, is the argument from design and the other four are versions of the first-cause argument.)
So I clearly posted that the first cause argument was the work of Saint Thomas Aquinas. So in essence I wasn't stealing anything and making it look that it originated from me. C'mon wake up dude! Are you having trouble comprehending what you are reading?...lol
I have been posting a lot of passages from the bible also...do I ever say it is coming from me?...well of course not, it is coming from the Lord, because the bible is the Word of God.
So am I plagiarizing the Lord too? Well of course not.
I'm just stating what He has said which is written in the bible like for example whoever believes and accepts Jesus Christ as their Lord Savior and repents their sins will be allowed to enter God's Kingdom of Heaven and spend eternity in paradise.
You are still showing that you are wet between the ears. ..lol
Where have I said what I posted previously about the first cause argument was my work?
If you go back to pg. 208 post #5178 this is what I clearly said to inform anyone who read what I posted:
(The most famous of all arguments for the existence of God are the "five ways" of Saint Thomas Aquinas.
One of the five ways, the fifth, is the argument from design and the other four are versions of the first-cause argument.)
So I clearly posted that the first cause argument was the work of Saint Thomas Aquinas. So in essence I wasn't stealing anything and making it look that it originated from me. C'mon wake up dude! Are you having trouble comprehending what you are reading?...lol
I have been posting a lot of passages from the bible also...do I ever say it is coming from me?...well of course not, it is coming from the Lord, because the bible is the Word of God.
So am I plagiarizing the Lord too? Well of course not.
I'm just stating what He has said which is written in the bible like for example whoever believes and accepts Jesus Christ as their Lord Savior and repents their sins will be allowed to enter God's Kingdom of Heaven and spend eternity in paradise.
Einstein didnt believe in a personal God because he could not get past all the evils that are present in our world.
He made an assumption as most atheists do, that if God existed , he would create a world that is physically good and morally good.
We as Christians do not believe that the purpose of the universe is to be physically perfect or to make perfect moral choices BUT as a place where spiritual creatures can CHOOSE to love God or reject God.
It would not be possible to have this CHOICE if the only choices we have can ONLY be good ones..
Evil is a consequence of free will, Mr Einstein, as brilliant as he was in science, could not comprehend this ...
Einstein didnt believe in a personal God because he could not get past all the evils that are present in our world.
He made an assumption as most atheists do, that if God existed , he would create a world that is physically good and morally good.
We as Christians do not believe that the purpose of the universe is to be physically perfect or to make perfect moral choices BUT as a place where spiritual creatures can CHOOSE to love God or reject God.
It would not be possible to have this CHOICE if the only choices we have can ONLY be good ones..
Evil is a consequence of free will, Mr Einstein, as brilliant as he was in science, could not comprehend this ...
I think alot confusion arises is when non believers equate the reasonings / laws and physics of this universe / world that we live in to a world which we as believers believe in (supernatural).
I think the atheists here are at a big disadvantage. We are currently in this universe, therefore we can study and observe the laws of the naturalistic world. I think logically we can conclude that everything that begins to exist has a cause.....This law is a conservation law within physics. We KNOW this to be true because we can observe.
However, when one tries to apply this rule to a world we believers believe in (supernatural), there is no basis to do so. Remember, the supernatural world is not the same as the natural world we live in. We havent observed the supernatural world, so we dont know its laws.
Therefore, comparisons shouldnt be made.
I think alot confusion arises is when non believers equate the reasonings / laws and physics of this universe / world that we live in to a world which we as believers believe in (supernatural).
I think the atheists here are at a big disadvantage. We are currently in this universe, therefore we can study and observe the laws of the naturalistic world. I think logically we can conclude that everything that begins to exist has a cause.....This law is a conservation law within physics. We KNOW this to be true because we can observe.
However, when one tries to apply this rule to a world we believers believe in (supernatural), there is no basis to do so. Remember, the supernatural world is not the same as the natural world we live in. We havent observed the supernatural world, so we dont know its laws.
Therefore, comparisons shouldnt be made.
This thread has to stop......Things are getting repeated and repeated and repeated.
SJD and Smoothd, you guys have been great, God bless, but i think you are exhausting alot of energy here.
Keep in my these passages.
Corinthians 1:18
"For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God"
When People laugh at this quote, it further strengthens its truth...
This thread has to stop......Things are getting repeated and repeated and repeated.
SJD and Smoothd, you guys have been great, God bless, but i think you are exhausting alot of energy here.
Keep in my these passages.
Corinthians 1:18
"For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God"
When People laugh at this quote, it further strengthens its truth...
SJD and Smooth....I further tell you why this is a waste of time.
Consider this quote
Romans 1:20" For since the creation of the world his invisible attributes – his eternal power and divine nature – have been clearly seen, because they are understood through what has been made. So people are without excuse"
With this quote in mind, for the past 5000 quotes, we have been looking at a wall that is painted in blue , we are saying that the colour of the wall is blue, we know it is blue, yet the atheists are saying it is not blue.
Thats what it comes down...We can all argue till we are blue in the face, it wont matter, this is what it comes down to.
SJD and Smooth....I further tell you why this is a waste of time.
Consider this quote
Romans 1:20" For since the creation of the world his invisible attributes – his eternal power and divine nature – have been clearly seen, because they are understood through what has been made. So people are without excuse"
With this quote in mind, for the past 5000 quotes, we have been looking at a wall that is painted in blue , we are saying that the colour of the wall is blue, we know it is blue, yet the atheists are saying it is not blue.
Thats what it comes down...We can all argue till we are blue in the face, it wont matter, this is what it comes down to.
Therefore, comparisons shouldn't be made.
Therefore, comparisons shouldn't be made.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.