All Forums | College Football

Army at Miami (Ohio) (10/08/2011)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2506
Posts: 28
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2002
Posts: 61
Posted: #1

Away:  Army [3-2 ATS]
Home:  Miami (Ohio) [1-3 ATS]

Game Time: 1:00 PM
Stadium: Fred Yager Stadium

Recent Meetings:
09/12/98 - MIAOH 14 vs. ARMY 13
09/27/97 - MIAOH 38 vs. ARMY 14
10/26/96 - ARMY 27 vs. MIAOH 7

Team Leaders:

Army:
Passing: Trent Steelman (205)
Rushing: Trent Steelman (437)
Receiving: Davyd Brooks (77)

Miami (Ohio):
Passing: Zac Dysert (1036)
Rushing: Erik Finklea (168)
Receiving: Nick Harwell (450)

More:
Live Odds
In-Depth Matchup Information
Consensus Betting Information

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 2751
Posted: #2

Miami Oh -1  SHARP

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 92
Posted: #3
Army no doubt!! 3rd best rushing team in the nation, all i'm gonna say is goodluck redhawks trying to stop that
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 92
Posted: #4
Collegesharp must not like the team army,he had tulane sharp last week too and look what happend to them
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 125
Posted: #5
I remember when Army was the joke of college football. Times have changed. I use to bet against Army all the time to win $$$. This is a new team with a better offense. Take The Black Knights  
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2004
Posts: 4765
Posted: #6
Army is the side here
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 2751
Posted: #7

Quote Originally Posted by ChasingTheMoney:

Collegesharp must not like the team army,he had tulane sharp last week too and look what happend to them

Actually I had Tulane against Duke 2 weeks ago.... your more than welcome to go to "my page" and look.  All my Saturday picks are there for the entire year.  And Miami Oh is not a final play.... it's a lean.... I'll make my plays official later on in the week.  And I do not dislike any team... I'm trying to pay my mortgage for the next 12 months... so any team that can make me money is the team I like (that week).  SHARP

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 2349
Posted: #8
Look at the line movement on this game! Gone from a pick-em to Army -2.5 and it is only Tuesday. I took Army at -2.5 because 1)the line movement 2) Miami Ohio sucks, 0 and 4 with a shitty QB 3) Army isn't a great team by any means but they should be able to manhandle Miami O with their running attack. My pick of the week.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 2751
Posted: #9

Quote Originally Posted by lordzud:

Look at the line movement on this game! Gone from a pick-em to Army -2.5 and it is only Tuesday. I took Army at -2.5 because 1)the line movement 2) Miami Ohio sucks, 0 and 4 with a shitty QB 3) Army isn't a great team by any means but they should be able to manhandle Miami O with their running attack. My pick of the week.

That line movement is not very important.  It hasn't hit a key number such as 3.  Same movement last week with the Syracuse/Rutgers game and Rutgers won and covered.  Just pointing it out, that's all.  Not that significant.  SHARP

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 192
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by CollegeSharp:

That line movement is not very important.  It hasn't hit a key number such as 3.  Same movement last week with the Syracuse/Rutgers game and Rutgers won and covered.  Just pointing it out, that's all.  Not that significant.  SHARP

You call yourself SHARP and line movement is "Not that significant" ??? Syracuse and Rutgersthere really wasn't any line movement and the little that there was went in the favor of RUTGERS FYI.It started off at -1.5 to -1 -105 by game time. I personally like Army myself,it has gone from -1 Miami to -2.5 Army now. I feel the game will be close but Knights pull it off in the end.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 2751
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by 9Ace9:

You call yourself SHARP and line movement is "Not that significant" ??? Syracuse and Rutgersthere really wasn't any line movement and the little that there was went in the favor of RUTGERS FYI.It started off at -1.5 to -1 -105 by game time. I personally like Army myself,it has gone from -1 Miami to -2.5 Army now. I feel the game will be close but Knights pull it off in the end.

Until it hits "3" it isn't that significant... it's that simple... it's like 4.5 - 6.5 - not that significant... Sorry you feel that way

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 2751
Posted: #12
9ACE9 - Covers has it has Rutgers +1.5 in the history... Opened Syracuse -3, to Rutgers -2, to Syracuse -1.5  ...... that's what I saw... I might be wrong.  If I am I apologize... Wouldn't be the first time.  I still have the paper at Syr -3 here... and thought I saw a Syracuse +1 or +2... Oh well, not significant.  Good luck sir.... That pick is a lean, not a final... Welcome to Covers!  SHARP
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 192
Posted: #13
I don't know what you are trying to say here  First you said line movement doesn't matter,then you give an example of the line going in rutgers favor and they won,i'm a little confused. Anyhow goodluck if you bet miami O but i feel they in for a serious ground attack
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1046
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by CollegeSharp:

Miami Oh -1  SHARP

 Love Miami (ohio)+2.5 too Sharp.... It seems like it is a good ML play for Miami (ohio) too Sharp.   BOL with this pick !!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 34
Posted: #15
Army averaging 300yds+ a game on the ground and Miami Ohio giving up 170yds a game on the ground. Umm you do the math! It's a no brainer...If there is one game Army wins on the road all season,it's right here
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5051
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by 9Ace9:

You call yourself SHARP and line movement is "Not that significant" ??? Syracuse and Rutgersthere really wasn't any line movement and the little that there was went in the favor of RUTGERS FYI.It started off at -1.5 to -1 -105 by game time. I personally like Army myself,it has gone from -1 Miami to -2.5 Army now. I feel the game will be close but Knights pull it off in the end.

  Sharp is correct! 3 is a Key # and unless you keep very good records on Steam move individual teams- Line movement is highly overrated!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5051
Posted: #17

MIAMI (OHIO) + 2.5

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5051
Posted: #18
    I KNOW the MAC Conference just as good as the sharps-if not even better. ( No brag- Just facts!)
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 192
Posted: #19
All your 3 posts are meaningless after the super prime play loss last weekend on fresno st. who was "easily supposed to cover"   Go Army!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 2751
Posted: #20

Quote Originally Posted by SaiGonVN1982:

 Love Miami (ohio)+2.5 too Sharp.... It seems like it is a good ML play for Miami (ohio) too Sharp.   BOL with this pick !!!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 122
Posted: #21
Not sure how Miami is going to stop the run in this contect.  Army has been rolling lately (never thought I'd say that) and Miami has been awful.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 43
Posted: #22
Army 31   Miami-Ohio 23
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 8713
Posted: #23
army-2.5
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 2113
Posted: #24
REDHAWKS +2
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 1482
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by CollegeSharp:

Until it hits "3" it isn't that significant... it's that simple... it's like 4.5 - 6.5 - not that significant... Sorry you feel that way

All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.