All Forums | College Football

Toledo/Akron

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 4087
Posts: 49
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 938
Posted: #26
well after reading your analysis and everyone else I think I feel safe with a two team tease of 6.5 pts getting the rockets under the field goal at 2.5 and under 80 for the total ...  maybe split a nickel 250 on the under and 250 on the tease ... Toledo does have the better offense so you figure if it does go over it should be Toledo at least by 3 to win ... just food for thought from a fellow d gen
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 5917
Posted: #27
Toledo
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 10263
Posted: #28
I'm on toledo.  What I do know is that toledo got an offense.  They are the 6th highest offensive production in the nation.  While they lost to ohio, akron lost to buffalo.  Akron defense gave up 500+ yard to buffalo.  I'm talking about the poor offense of buffalo here. 

Covering against the spread this year, toledo is on the plus side while akron is on the negative side.  Toledo on the road is something like 11-1 ATS

Here is a question though.  Did Toledo rocket loses 2 in a row this season?  The answer is no but will they cover?  That is to be determine. 

The defense of akron is no good as we see how they fair up with a no good offense of buffalo and you put in a high production offense of toledo into the mix and you will have your ball game. 

Expect toledo to run all over akron.  Akron lost to buffalo because akron defense can not stop the run. 

I'm on toledo tonight.  First half and for full game. 




X_____________________________
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2016
Posts: 1913
Posted: #29
Quote Originally Posted by Winzs:

well after reading your analysis and everyone else I think I feel safe with a two team tease of 6.5 pts getting the rockets under the field goal at 2.5 and under 80 for the total ...  maybe split a nickel 250 on the under and 250 on the tease ... Toledo does have the better offense so you figure if it does go over it should be Toledo at least by 3 to win ... just food for thought from a fellow d gen
This made me laugh... Degenerate MAC Tuesday ans Wednesdays. Good luck with your pick.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2016
Posts: 1913
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by Winzs:

well after reading your analysis and everyone else I think I feel safe with a two team tease of 6.5 pts getting the rockets under the field goal at 2.5 and under 80 for the total ...  maybe split a nickel 250 on the under and 250 on the tease ... Toledo does have the better offense so you figure if it does go over it should be Toledo at least by 3 to win ... just food for thought from a fellow d gen
That was also the reason I took Toledo, it was a hedge vs my under play, if this goes over I think Toledo covers.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2016
Posts: 1913
Posted: #31
Quote Originally Posted by 727magic:

Toledo
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2016
Posts: 1913
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by nfl_brosuf:

I'm on toledo.  What I do know is that toledo got an offense.  They are the 6th highest offensive production in the nation.  While they lost to ohio, akron lost to buffalo.  Akron defense gave up 500+ yard to buffalo.  I'm talking about the poor offense of buffalo here. 

Covering against the spread this year, toledo is on the plus side while akron is on the negative side.  Toledo on the road is something like 11-1 ATS

Here is a question though.  Did Toledo rocket loses 2 in a row this season?  The answer is no but will they cover?  That is to be determine. 

The defense of akron is no good as we see how they fair up with a no good offense of buffalo and you put in a high production offense of toledo into the mix and you will have your ball game. 

Expect toledo to run all over akron.  Akron lost to buffalo because akron defense can not stop the run. 

I'm on toledo tonight.  First half and for full game. 




Let's get it...Toledo and the under for me.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 938
Posted: #33
yeah when your laying paper on Mac Weds .......you might have a problem !!! lol
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2016
Posts: 65
Posted: #34
Im on the Rockets
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 2096
Posted: #35
If Toledo didn't lose last week, this line would be easily over 2TD's.. that said, toledos defense isn't that fantastic.. I think Akron will put up some points.. I see a lot of people on the under.. I'm not at all a total player, but careful with that one.. Toledo seems like the logical play.. but this thing we do ain't always logical 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2016
Posts: 1913
Posted: #36
Quote Originally Posted by DRIBBLE4LIFE:

OK guys. Serious question, as I don't follow either team. Do any of u think Akron could win on the ML ?

I have TOL ML in a few parlays and may want to make a straight bet? Any thoughts pls?
Anything can happen in the MAC on a Wednesday night. It seems everyone thinks that Toledo should ram the ball down their throat so I took Toledo to hedge my under play. I don't have a concrete answer for you except that Toledo has a good offense and Akron's defense is terrible.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2016
Posts: 1913
Posted: #37
Quote Originally Posted by Moonstormsnow:

If Toledo didn't lose last week, this line would be easily over 2TD's.. that said, toledos defense isn't that fantastic.. I think Akron will put up some points.. I see a lot of people on the under.. I'm not at all a total player, but careful with that one.. Toledo seems like the logical play.. but this thing we do ain't always logical 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2016
Posts: 1913
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by DRIBBLE4LIFE:


thks a lott dude. I knoe TOL cna score. I think Akorn has an OK offense from what I am hearing.
Yeah it's ok, nothing spectacular.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2014
Posts: 86
Posted: #39
Keep it mind lines opened up Toledo -8, o/u 64
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2016
Posts: 1913
Posted: #40
Yeah all of the public money went on Toledo and the Over....The under seems like the play here.. If Toledo can run the ball they should chew some clock in a methodical fashion.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 499
Posted: #41
Both teams can move the ball. I don't know how Akron got mauled last week by Buffalo but I just chalk it up to the MAC. Akron is prone to let off at least 2 big run touchdowns a game. I think Akron keeps it within reach maybe even down 17 and a back door cover. Another small bet on the MAC just to keep me interested.
Akron plus10.5
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2016
Posts: 1913
Posted: #42
I think I will lay off of the second half. I cashed first half under... I think I will  keep it With Toledo -10 under 72. No second half action warranted
window.post_1478135671800_7 = function(win,msg){ win.postMessage(msg,"*"); }window.post_1478135697352_32 = function(win,msg){ win.postMessage(msg,"*"); }
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2016
Posts: 1913
Posted: #43
I actually bet the second half and cashed all of the tickets... I hope everyone who read this today cleaned up.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2016
Posts: 1913
Posted: #44
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 33652
Posted: #45
Again. You bumped it late last night when you won, which is fine, and congrats.  Why do you feel the need to bump it again 12 plus hours later?? Come on. Do you need the attention that bad?
Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2016
Posts: 1913
Posted: #46
I don't keep track of my stats, therefore I bump some of my better plays.. Why do you have a tremendous hard on for me? It says ChickMagnut not DikkMagnut
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 33652
Posted: #47
Quote Originally Posted by ChickMagnut:

I don't keep track of my stats, therefore I bump some of my better plays.. Why do you have a tremendous hard on for me? It says ChickMagnut not DikkMagnut
I am not a fan of people who act like a child. There is no need bump crap like you do. Why not just keep it all in one weekly thread. 
Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2016
Posts: 1913
Posted: #48
I don't make picks in an organized fashion like most people. I pick of bits of information here and there and make picks. I dont sit down and look at the lines and say here are my four plays. I look around and post when I like something or want to have a conversation about something. As far as acting like a child, you are much more childish than me. You are like a junior high hall monitor. I could tee off on you but I don't know you well enough and I am not dumb enough to presume that you are this or that based on a few posts. I will leave that for the distinguished geniuses like yourself.
 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 33652
Posted: #49
LOL. You just don't get the point do you? Not about bumping nor doing one thread. Why am I not surprised. 


Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.