great analogy! Great write up. very very close game. I think Sark is frustrated with Mannings performance. I am not playing it. If I did I would take the points,,, but like you said... the Texas defense will keep them around and relevant deep into the game. The under may be a play here. But very close game.
great analogy! Great write up. very very close game. I think Sark is frustrated with Mannings performance. I am not playing it. If I did I would take the points,,, but like you said... the Texas defense will keep them around and relevant deep into the game. The under may be a play here. But very close game.
@bookieassassin Wow… nothing logically tells me to me says play Texas … vandy has shown to be a very good team… very good imo…..bama…lsu ..and mizzou back to back to back…. That’s a very difficult 3 games…..Texas has shown shite……but I am a horrible gambler… I will just watch this one. These are the types of moments when I shook my head after a loss… unexplainable to me. You did say if…. Arch out. Come on arch.
20.3 million spent on NIL, that ranks #1 in the nation... 5 an 4 stars vs 3 and 2 stars. That Vandy QB is a Big Time Player. Big QB Edge for Vandy, along with coaching edge. Texas has better players nothing against Vandy. If they were at home they could but, not on the road
@bookieassassin Wow… nothing logically tells me to me says play Texas … vandy has shown to be a very good team… very good imo…..bama…lsu ..and mizzou back to back to back…. That’s a very difficult 3 games…..Texas has shown shite……but I am a horrible gambler… I will just watch this one. These are the types of moments when I shook my head after a loss… unexplainable to me. You did say if…. Arch out. Come on arch.
20.3 million spent on NIL, that ranks #1 in the nation... 5 an 4 stars vs 3 and 2 stars. That Vandy QB is a Big Time Player. Big QB Edge for Vandy, along with coaching edge. Texas has better players nothing against Vandy. If they were at home they could but, not on the road
On pure talent, Texas is vastly superior...But, on team cohesiveness and coaching, and motivation, Vandy has a big advantage this season...Texas will have home field... I won't touch it...But I would not be surprised with a Vandy win...I would caution on the optics...Texas D will keep them in any game, though Miss St. was not a good recent example... If Vandy does win, I do believe it will be a close game... Hook em' Horns! Quote Originally Posted by Tomm_Brady: This line is surprising to me. Texas has been overrated and squeaking by all year. Pretty equal talent all over the field, Vandy has the MUCH better QB. Am I insane or is Vegas insane?
Just like you doubted them against Oklahoma. I told you to take Texas Big. Texas gets it done here man, by a TD minimum.
On pure talent, Texas is vastly superior...But, on team cohesiveness and coaching, and motivation, Vandy has a big advantage this season...Texas will have home field... I won't touch it...But I would not be surprised with a Vandy win...I would caution on the optics...Texas D will keep them in any game, though Miss St. was not a good recent example... If Vandy does win, I do believe it will be a close game... Hook em' Horns! Quote Originally Posted by Tomm_Brady: This line is surprising to me. Texas has been overrated and squeaking by all year. Pretty equal talent all over the field, Vandy has the MUCH better QB. Am I insane or is Vegas insane?
Just like you doubted them against Oklahoma. I told you to take Texas Big. Texas gets it done here man, by a TD minimum.
This line is surprising to me. Texas has been overrated and squeaking by all year. Pretty equal talent all over the field, Vandy has the MUCH better QB. Am I insane or is Vegas insane?
This line is surprising to me. Texas has been overrated and squeaking by all year. Pretty equal talent all over the field, Vandy has the MUCH better QB. Am I insane or is Vegas insane?
Quote Originally Posted by drunkbettor: Vandy hasn’t beaten anyone. Not surprised at all by the line. And Texas has? Texas has played only ONE team with a winning record this season (OU). Be with that for a second!
where were you there for the beginning of the season when they played ohio state ? so not just one team. they are on their third team.
Quote Originally Posted by drunkbettor: Vandy hasn’t beaten anyone. Not surprised at all by the line. And Texas has? Texas has played only ONE team with a winning record this season (OU). Be with that for a second!
where were you there for the beginning of the season when they played ohio state ? so not just one team. they are on their third team.
Quote Originally Posted by drunkbettor: Vandy hasn’t beaten anyone. Not surprised at all by the line. And Texas has? Texas has played only ONE team with a winning record this season (OU). Be with that for a second!
@drunkbettor
You said Vandy hasn't beaten anyone...
My post was meant to say Texas has beaten ONLY one team with a winning record... not played.
Quote Originally Posted by drunkbettor: Vandy hasn’t beaten anyone. Not surprised at all by the line. And Texas has? Texas has played only ONE team with a winning record this season (OU). Be with that for a second!
@drunkbettor
You said Vandy hasn't beaten anyone...
My post was meant to say Texas has beaten ONLY one team with a winning record... not played.
Quote Originally Posted by SportsIntuition: Quote Originally Posted by drunkbettor: Vandy hasn’t beaten anyone. Not surprised at all by the line. And Texas has? Texas has played only ONE team with a winning record this season (OU). Be with that for a second! @drunkbettor You said Vandy hasn't beaten anyone... My post was meant to say Texas has beaten ONLY one team with a winning record... not played.
and vandy has beaten one bad lsu team and should've lost to a good mizz team. but the mizz qb left the game with an injury. mizz had that game won all the way until the injury.
Quote Originally Posted by SportsIntuition: Quote Originally Posted by drunkbettor: Vandy hasn’t beaten anyone. Not surprised at all by the line. And Texas has? Texas has played only ONE team with a winning record this season (OU). Be with that for a second! @drunkbettor You said Vandy hasn't beaten anyone... My post was meant to say Texas has beaten ONLY one team with a winning record... not played.
and vandy has beaten one bad lsu team and should've lost to a good mizz team. but the mizz qb left the game with an injury. mizz had that game won all the way until the injury.
Quote Originally Posted by drunkbettor: Vandy hasn’t beaten anyone. Not surprised at all by the line. Yeah man, just Missouri, LSU, South Carolina -- all teams that have taken the "anyone" teams to the edge. (SC almost beating BAMA, etc.) I get what you are saying, but you obviously have not watched them play ball, or if you have, then maybe you were already blacked out -- but that is just a terrible take -- Vandy is no joke. Not positive they beat Texas, but they most certainly can. Maybe lay off the booze @drunkbettor
Let's be serious here. Could it be that the SEC just isn't very good at the top end? That they have a bunch of decent to good but not great teams? i mean the stalwart of that you are comparing these teams to was rung up by a bad Florida state team. None of the teams you listed beat anyone of consequence out of the SEC. Somebody has to win and lose these games. It's how sports work. There just isn't an elite team to separate from the rest. It reminds me of a typical year in the Big12.
Quote Originally Posted by drunkbettor: Vandy hasn’t beaten anyone. Not surprised at all by the line. Yeah man, just Missouri, LSU, South Carolina -- all teams that have taken the "anyone" teams to the edge. (SC almost beating BAMA, etc.) I get what you are saying, but you obviously have not watched them play ball, or if you have, then maybe you were already blacked out -- but that is just a terrible take -- Vandy is no joke. Not positive they beat Texas, but they most certainly can. Maybe lay off the booze @drunkbettor
Let's be serious here. Could it be that the SEC just isn't very good at the top end? That they have a bunch of decent to good but not great teams? i mean the stalwart of that you are comparing these teams to was rung up by a bad Florida state team. None of the teams you listed beat anyone of consequence out of the SEC. Somebody has to win and lose these games. It's how sports work. There just isn't an elite team to separate from the rest. It reminds me of a typical year in the Big12.
Quote Originally Posted by drunkbettor: Vandy hasn’t beaten anyone. Not surprised at all by the line. Yeah man, just Missouri, LSU, South Carolina -- all teams that have taken the "anyone" teams to the edge. (SC almost beating BAMA, etc.) I get what you are saying, but you obviously have not watched them play ball, or if you have, then maybe you were already blacked out -- but that is just a terrible take -- Vandy is no joke. Not positive they beat Texas, but they most certainly can. Maybe lay off the booze @drunkbettor
vandy was dominated by missouri and alabama. they won one and lost one. i watched them play lsu and know that the team gets lucky bounces.
Quote Originally Posted by drunkbettor: Vandy hasn’t beaten anyone. Not surprised at all by the line. Yeah man, just Missouri, LSU, South Carolina -- all teams that have taken the "anyone" teams to the edge. (SC almost beating BAMA, etc.) I get what you are saying, but you obviously have not watched them play ball, or if you have, then maybe you were already blacked out -- but that is just a terrible take -- Vandy is no joke. Not positive they beat Texas, but they most certainly can. Maybe lay off the booze @drunkbettor
vandy was dominated by missouri and alabama. they won one and lost one. i watched them play lsu and know that the team gets lucky bounces.
@Mskeets Good man, but missing the point..... SOME TEAMS - SIMPLY PLAY TO THE LEVEL OF THEIR OPPONENT * Ga Tech is one - Texas is another to a lesser degree. See all the love for Duke a few weeks back? Duke won the stats, but got their azz kicked...... again. On PAPER, Duke was better. As a coach, you can't expect MAX effort from your players every week (with rare exceptions - eg. Indiana). On the average, it's about 4-5X/year maybe. So, as a coach you pick your spots. For Texas their talent is often enough, but like we saw in 2023 - I watched them struggle to block Rice for 2-3 quarters, later a life/death struggle with Wyoming - but then they kicked the crap out of Bama on the road....... WHY does this happen? Many coaches have problems motivating players for lessser opponents - some, like Kirby Smart, don't want to - they want MAX effort for the big games, just a W for minor ones. HERE - you expect them to play like they did vs Kentucky/Miss St.? They damn sure might, but it makes little sense. *side note - vs lesser D's (Bama/Mizzou/LSU) - Pavia has completed 59% / 6.4-att / 2 TD-2 INT. In the passing game - he's a liability.
“All I need are some tasty waves, a cool buzz, and I’m fine.” – Jeff Spicoli
@Mskeets Good man, but missing the point..... SOME TEAMS - SIMPLY PLAY TO THE LEVEL OF THEIR OPPONENT * Ga Tech is one - Texas is another to a lesser degree. See all the love for Duke a few weeks back? Duke won the stats, but got their azz kicked...... again. On PAPER, Duke was better. As a coach, you can't expect MAX effort from your players every week (with rare exceptions - eg. Indiana). On the average, it's about 4-5X/year maybe. So, as a coach you pick your spots. For Texas their talent is often enough, but like we saw in 2023 - I watched them struggle to block Rice for 2-3 quarters, later a life/death struggle with Wyoming - but then they kicked the crap out of Bama on the road....... WHY does this happen? Many coaches have problems motivating players for lessser opponents - some, like Kirby Smart, don't want to - they want MAX effort for the big games, just a W for minor ones. HERE - you expect them to play like they did vs Kentucky/Miss St.? They damn sure might, but it makes little sense. *side note - vs lesser D's (Bama/Mizzou/LSU) - Pavia has completed 59% / 6.4-att / 2 TD-2 INT. In the passing game - he's a liability.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.