• Forums
  • NFL Betting
  • NBA Betting
  • MLB Betting
  • NHL Betting
  • NCAAF Betting
  • NCAAB Betting
  • Soccer Betting
  • Tennis Betting
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Drop Down Caret
Covers Logo
  • Sports
    • NFL
      • NFL Home
      • Scores & Matchups
      • Prop Projections
      • Free Picks
      • Weather
      • Injuries
    • NCAAF
      • NCAAF Home
      • Scores & Matchups
      • Prop Projections
      • Free Picks
      • Weather
      • Injuries
    • NBA
      • NBA Home
      • Scores & Matchups
      • Prop Projections
      • Free Picks
      • Injuries
    • NCAAB
      • NCAAB Home
      • Scores & Matchups
      • Free Picks
      • Injuries
    • MLB
      • MLB Home
      • Scores & Matchups
      • Prop Projections
      • Free Picks
      • Weather
      • Injuries
    • NHL
      • NHL Home
      • Scores & Matchups
      • Prop Projections
      • Free Picks
      • Injuries
    • Soccer
    • UFC
    • WNBA
      • WNBA Home
      • Scores & Matchups
      • Free Picks
      • Injuries
    • CFL
      • CFL Home
      • Scores & Matchups
      • Free Picks
    • Golf
      • Golf Home
      • Golf Odds
      • Masters Odds
      • PGA Championship Odds
      • US Open Odds
      • British Open Odds
      • Ryder Cup Odds
      • Golf Picks
  • Odds
    • All Odds
    • NFL
    • NCAAF
    • NBA
    • NCAAB
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Golf
    • Soccer Odds
      • MLS Odds
      • Champions League Odds
      • Premier League Odds
    • UFC
    • WNBA
    • CFL
    • Election Odds
    • Futures
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
  • Picks
    • All Picks
    • NFL
    • NBA
    • NHL
    • MLB
    • NCAAF
    • NCAAB
    • Golf
    • WNBA
    • CFL
    • User Picks
    • Team User Picks
    • Consensus Picks
      • All Consensus Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • CFL
      • WNBA
      • Consensus FAQ
      • Public Money
  • Betting
    • US Betting Sites
      US Betting
      Sites
      Canada Betting Sites
      Canada Betting Sites
    • Sportsbook Reviews
    • States
      • US Legal Tracker
      • Revenue Tracker
      • Arizona
      • Arkansas
      • California
      • Colorado
      • Connecticut
      • DC
      • Florida
      • Georgia
      • Illinois
      • Indiana
      • Iowa
      • Kansas
      • Kentucky
      • Louisiana
      • Maine
      • Maryland
      • Massachusetts
      • Michigan
      • Mississippi
      • Nevada
      • New Hampshire
      • New Jersey
      • New York
      • North Carolina
      • Ohio
      • Oregon
      • Pennsylvania
      • Tennessee
      • Texas
      • Vermont
      • Virginia
      • West Virginia
      • Wyoming
    • Provinces
      • Alberta
      • British Columbia
      • Manitoba
      • Quebec (English)
      • Quebec (francais)
      • New Brunswick
      • Newfoundland and Labrador
      • Northwest Territories
      • Nova Scotia
      • Nunavut
      • Ontario
      • Prince Edward Island
      • Saskatchewan
      • Yukon
    • Betting By Sport
      • Baseball
      • Basketball
      • Boxing
      • College Football
      • F1
      • Football
      • Super Bowl
      • Golf
      • Hockey
      • Horse Racing
      • March Madness
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • World Cup
    • Betting Apps
      • Best Sports Betting Apps
      • Canada
      • Ontario
      • Illinois
      • Kentucky
      • Maryland
      • Massachusetts
      • Michigan
      • New Jersey
      • New York
      • North Carolina
      • Ohio
      • Pennsylvania
      • Virginia
    • Rest of World
      • UK
      • South Korea
      • International
    • Betting Guides
      • All Guides
      • Glossary
      • Betting Calculators
        • Odds Converter
        • Parlay Calculator
      • Futures Betting Guide
      • Moneyline Betting Guide
      • Over/Under Betting Guide
      • Parlay Betting Guide
      • Point Spread Betting Guide
      • Prop Betting Guide
      • Sports Betting Guides
        • How To Bet On Sports Guide
        • NFL Betting Guide
        • NHL Betting Guide
        • NBA Betting Guide
        • MLB Betting Guide
        • NCAAB Betting Guide
        • NCAAF Betting Guide
        • Golf Betting Guide
        • Tennis Betting Guide
      • Teaser Betting Guide
    • Betting News
      • All News
      • Industry News
      • Podcasts
      • Covers Videos
      • Covers Writers
      • Daily Promos
  • Promos
    • Sportsbook Promos
    • Canada Sportsbook Promos
    • Bonuses By Sportsbook
      • 1xBet Promo Code
      • 888sport Promo Code
      • bet365 Bonus Code
      • BET99 Promo Code
      • Betfred Promo Code
      • BetMGM Bonus Code
      • BetRivers Bonus Code
      • BetVictor Promo Code
      • Betway Bonus Code
      • Borgata Promo Code
      • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
      • DraftKings Promo Code
      • ESPN BET Promo Code
      • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
      • FanDuel Promo Code
      • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
      • NorthStar Bets Promo Code
      • Sports Interaction Promo
      • Stake Promo Code
      • TonyBet Promo Code
    • Bonuses By Region
      • Arkansas Promos
      • Arizona Promos
      • Colorado Promos
      • Connecticut Promos
      • DC Promos
      • Illinois Promos
      • Indiana Promos
      • Iowa Promos
      • Kansas Promos
      • Kentucky Promos
      • Louisiana Promos
      • Maine Promos
      • Maryland Promos
      • Massachusetts Promos
      • Michigan Promos
      • New Jersey Promos
      • New York Promos
      • North Carolina Promos
      • Ohio Promos
      • Pennsylvania Promos
      • Tennessee Promos
      • Vermont Promos
      • Virginia Promos
      • West Virginia Promos
      • Wyoming Promos
  • Contests
    • Free Daily Contests
    • Contests Home
    • My Contests
    • Streak Survivor
    • King of Covers
    • Ultimate Race
    • Office Pools
    • Leaderboard
      • League Money Leaders
      • Team Money Leaders
      • Public Money
  • Forum
    • All Forums
    • NFL Betting Forum
    • NBA Betting Forum
    • MLB Betting Forum
    • NHL Betting Forum
    • NCAAF Betting Forum
    • NCAAB Betting Forum
    • Soccer Betting Forum
    • Help Forum
    • General Discussion Forum
    • Forum Guidelines
    • Forum FAQ
  • Casino
    • Sweepstakes Casinos
      • Sweepstakes Casinos
      • Sweepstakes Promos
        • Casino.click
        • Chanced Casino
        • Crown Coins Casino
        • Lonestar
        • McLuck
        • Mega Bonanza Casino
        • PlayFame
        • Pulsz
        • Stake.us
        • Thrillzz
    • US Casinos
      • US Online Casinos
      • US Online Casino Bonuses
      • Casino Promos
        • bet365 Casino Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Casino Promo
        • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
        • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
        • DraftKings Casino Promo
        • Fanatics Casino Promo
        • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
    • Canada Casinos
      • Canada Online Casinos
      • Provinces
        • Alberta Online Casinos
        • BC Online Casinos
        • Ontario Online Casinos
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NCAAF
    • NBA
    • NCAAB
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Soccer
    • UFC
    • WNBA
    • CFL
    • Golf
  • Odds
    • All Odds
    • NFL
    • NCAAF
    • NBA
    • NCAAB
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Golf
    • Soccer Odds
    • UFC
    • WNBA
    • CFL
    • Election Odds
    • Futures
  • Picks
    • All Picks
    • NFL
    • NBA
    • NHL
    • MLB
    • NCAAF
    • NCAAB
    • Golf
    • WNBA
    • CFL
    • User Picks
    • Team User Picks
    • Consensus Picks
  • Prop Projections
    • NFL
    • NBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
  • Betting
    • US Betting Sites
      US Betting
      Sites
      Canada Betting Sites
      Canada Betting
      Sites
    • Sportsbook Reviews
    • States
    • Provinces
    • Betting By Sport
    • Betting Apps
    • Rest of World
    • Betting Guides
    • Betting News
  • Promos
    • Sportsbook Promos
    • Canada Sportsbook Promos
    • Bonuses By Sportsbook
    • Bonuses By Region
  • Contests
    • Free Daily Contests
    • Contests Home
    • My Contests
    • Streak Survivor
    • King of Covers
    • Ultimate Race
    • Office Pools
    • Leaderboard
  • Forum
    • All Forums
    • NFL Betting Forum
    • NBA Betting Forum
    • MLB Betting Forum
    • NHL Betting Forum
    • NCAAF Betting Forum
    • NCAAB Betting Forum
    • Soccer Betting Forum
    • Help Forum
    • General Discussion Forum
    • Forum Guidelines
    • Forum FAQ
  • Casino
    • Sweepstakes Casinos
    • US Casinos
    • Canada Casinos
Covers Account
Log in Create account
Back
By Sportsbook
  • 1xBet Promo Code
  • 888sport Promo Code
  • bet365 Bonus Code
  • BET99 Promo Code
  • Betfred Promo Code
  • BetMGM Bonus Code
  • BetRivers Bonus Code
  • BetVictor Promo Code
  • Betway Bonus Code
  • Borgata Promo Code
  • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
  • DraftKings Promo Code
  • ESPN BET Promo Code
  • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
  • FanDuel Promo Code
  • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
  • NorthStar Bets Promo Code
  • Sports Interaction Promo
  • Stake Promo Code
  • TonyBet Promo Code
Back
By Region
  • Arkansas Promos
  • Arizona Promos
  • Colorado Promos
  • Connecticut Promos
  • DC Promos
  • Illinois Promos
  • Indiana Promos
  • Iowa Promos
  • Kansas Promos
  • Kentucky Promos
  • Louisiana Promos
  • Maine Promos
  • Maryland Promos
  • Massachusetts Promos
  • Michigan Promos
  • New Jersey Promos
  • New York Promos
  • North Carolina Promos
  • Ohio Promos
  • Pennsylvania Promos
  • Tennessee Promos
  • Vermont Promos
  • Virginia Promos
  • West Virginia Promos
  • Wyoming Promos
Back
Betting Calculators
  • Odds Converter
  • Parlay Calculator
Back
Sports Betting Guides
  • How To Bet On Sports Guide
  • NFL Betting Guide
  • NHL Betting Guide
  • NBA Betting Guide
  • MLB Betting Guide
  • NCAAB Betting Guide
  • NCAAF Betting Guide
  • Golf Betting Guide
  • Tennis Betting Guide
Back
Sportsbook Promos
  • BetMGM Promo
  • Caesars Promo
  • DraftKings Promo
  • FanDuel Promo
Back
Sign up Promos
  • Sportsbook Bonuses 101
Back
Sweepstakes Promos
  • Casino.click
  • Chanced Casino
  • Crown Coins Casino
  • Lonestar
  • McLuck
  • Mega Bonanza Casino
  • PlayFame
  • Pulsz
  • Stake.us
  • Thrillzz
Back
Casino Promos
  • bet365 Casino Bonus Code
  • BetRivers Casino Promo
  • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
  • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
  • DraftKings Casino Promo
  • Fanatics Casino Promo
  • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
Back
Provinces
  • Alberta Online Casinos
  • BC Online Casinos
  • Ontario Online Casinos
Back
NHL
  • NHL Home
  • Scores & Matchups
  • Prop Projections
  • Free Picks
  • Injuries
Back
NBA
  • NBA Home
  • Scores & Matchups
  • Prop Projections
  • Free Picks
  • Injuries
Back
CFL
  • CFL Home
  • Scores & Matchups
  • Free Picks
Back
NFL
  • NFL Home
  • Scores & Matchups
  • Prop Projections
  • Free Picks
  • Weather
  • Injuries
Back
Golf
  • Golf Home
  • Golf Odds
  • Masters Odds
  • PGA Championship Odds
  • US Open Odds
  • British Open Odds
  • Ryder Cup Odds
  • Golf Picks
Back
MLB
  • MLB Home
  • Scores & Matchups
  • Prop Projections
  • Free Picks
  • Weather
  • Injuries
Back
Soccer
  • MLS
  • Champions League
  • Premier League
Back
WNBA
  • WNBA Home
  • Scores & Matchups
  • Free Picks
  • Injuries
Back
NCAAB
  • NCAAB Home
  • Scores & Matchups
  • Free Picks
  • Injuries
Back
NCAAF
  • NCAAF Home
  • Scores & Matchups
  • Prop Projections
  • Free Picks
  • Weather
  • Injuries
Back
Free Picks
  • All Picks
  • NFL
  • NBA
  • NHL
  • MLB
  • NCAAF
  • NCAAB
  • Golf
  • WNBA
  • CFL
  • User Picks
  • Team User Picks
Back
Consensus Picks
  • All Consensus Picks
  • NFL
  • NBA
  • NHL
  • MLB
  • NCAAF
  • NCAAB
  • CFL
  • WNBA
  • Consensus FAQ
  • Public Money
Back
Legal States
  • US Legal Tracker
  • Revenue Tracker
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • California
  • Colorado
  • Connecticut
  • DC
  • Florida
  • Georgia
  • Illinois
  • Indiana
  • Iowa
  • Kansas
  • Kentucky
  • Louisiana
  • Maine
  • Maryland
  • Massachusetts
  • Michigan
  • Mississippi
  • Nevada
  • New Hampshire
  • New Jersey
  • New York
  • North Carolina
  • Ohio
  • Oregon
  • Pennsylvania
  • Tennessee
  • Texas
  • Vermont
  • Virginia
  • West Virginia
  • Wyoming
Back
Legal Provinces
  • Alberta
  • British Columbia
  • Manitoba
  • Quebec (English)
  • Quebec (francais)
  • New Brunswick
  • Newfoundland and Labrador
  • Northwest Territories
  • Nova Scotia
  • Nunavut
  • Ontario
  • Prince Edward Island
  • Saskatchewan
  • Yukon
Back
By Sportsbook
  • 1xBet Promo Code
  • 888sport Promo Code
  • bet365 Bonus Code
  • BET99 Promo Code
  • Betfred Promo Code
  • BetMGM Bonus Code
  • BetRivers Bonus Code
  • BetVictor Promo Code
  • Betway Bonus Code
  • Borgata Promo Code
  • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
  • DraftKings Promo Code
  • ESPN BET Promo Code
  • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
  • FanDuel Promo Code
  • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
  • NorthStar Bets Promo Code
  • Sports Interaction Promo
  • Stake Promo Code
  • TonyBet Promo Code
Back
By Region
  • Arkansas Promos
  • Arizona Promos
  • Colorado Promos
  • Connecticut Promos
  • DC Promos
  • Illinois Promos
  • Indiana Promos
  • Iowa Promos
  • Kansas Promos
  • Kentucky Promos
  • Louisiana Promos
  • Maine Promos
  • Maryland Promos
  • Massachusetts Promos
  • Michigan Promos
  • New Jersey Promos
  • New York Promos
  • North Carolina Promos
  • Ohio Promos
  • Pennsylvania Promos
  • Tennessee Promos
  • Vermont Promos
  • Virginia Promos
  • West Virginia Promos
  • Wyoming Promos
Back
By Sport
  • Baseball
  • Basketball
  • Boxing
  • College Football
  • F1
  • Football
  • Super Bowl
  • Golf
  • Hockey
  • Horse Racing
  • March Madness
  • Soccer
  • UFC
  • World Cup
Back
Betting Guides
  • All Guides
  • Glossary
  • Betting Calculators
  • Futures Betting Guide
  • Moneyline Betting Guide
  • Over/Under Betting Guide
  • Parlay Betting Guide
  • Point Spread Betting Guide
  • Prop Betting Guide
  • Sports Betting Guides
  • Teaser Betting Guide
Back
Betting News
  • All News
  • Industry News
  • Podcasts
  • Covers Videos
  • Covers Writers
  • Daily Promos
Back
Betting Apps
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • Canada
  • Ontario
  • Illinois
  • Kentucky
  • Maryland
  • Massachusetts
  • Michigan
  • New Jersey
  • New York
  • North Carolina
  • Ohio
  • Pennsylvania
  • Virginia
Back
Rest of World
  • UK
  • South Korea
  • International
Back
Betting News
  • All News
  • Industry News
  • Podcasts
  • Covers Videos
  • Covers Writers
  • Daily Promos
Back
Betting Guides
  • All Guides
  • Glossary
  • Betting Calculators
  • Futures Betting Guide
  • Moneyline Betting Guide
  • Over/Under Betting Guide
  • Parlay Betting Guide
  • Point Spread Betting Guide
  • Prop Betting Guide
  • Sports Betting Guides
  • Teaser Betting Guide
Back
Sweepstakes Casinos
  • Sweepstakes Casinos
  • Sweepstakes Promos
Back
US Casinos
  • US Online Casinos
  • US Online Casino Bonuses
  • Casino Promos
Back
Canada Casinos
  • Canada Online Casinos
  • Provinces
Back
Soccer Odds
  • MLS Odds
  • Champions League Odds
  • Premier League Odds
Back
Futures
  • NFL
  • NBA
  • MLB
  • NHL
  • NCAAB
  • NCAAF
Back
Leaderboard
  • League Money Leaders
  • Team Money Leaders
  • Public Money
Play for $500 in UFC Store gift cards & Covers prizes with our FREE UFC 249 contest!
Play for $500 in UFC Store gift cards & Covers prizes with our FREE UFC 249 contest!
All Forums | College Basketball

Thursday Hoops

«First Previous 123 Next Last»
TRAIN69
Macwestie1
ZonaCats
PINNACLE
bandit1010
...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 9789
Posts: 61
«First Previous 123 Next Last»
 
nropp11
nropp11
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 7963
Posted: Feb. 16, 2012 - 3:17 PM ET #26

Quote Originally Posted by dangor2:

Nropp,

I am dying to get your thoughts on the two early Bracketbuster games, Drexel-Cleveland and Wichita-Davidson.  With Cleveland playing poorly lately, I'm thinking Drexel can steal a win on the road.  I hate betting against Wichita, but home dog for Davidson might be tempting since it means so much more to them.  Am I on the right track?


I probably put the Drexel game at a PK without D'Aundray Brown in the lineup.

I think Wichita's in the -5, -6 range, too.

I like your line of thinking.

GL
Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Edit
Quote Originally Posted by dangor2:

Nropp,

I am dying to get your thoughts on the two early Bracketbuster games, Drexel-Cleveland and Wichita-Davidson.  With Cleveland playing poorly lately, I'm thinking Drexel can steal a win on the road.  I hate betting against Wichita, but home dog for Davidson might be tempting since it means so much more to them.  Am I on the right track?


I probably put the Drexel game at a PK without D'Aundray Brown in the lineup.

I think Wichita's in the -5, -6 range, too.

I like your line of thinking.

GL
 
nropp11
nropp11
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 7963
Posted: Feb. 16, 2012 - 3:18 PM ET #27

Quote Originally Posted by Rollbama1237:

The points do look tempting, but VT has been an absolute money pit this season (6-14 ATS). Promised myself that the Duke game was the last time I would side with the Hokies this season. 

Not playing either side of that one, but how do you feel about the under? 4 of the last 5 matchups between these two have played well under 127, and VT playing as slow as it ever has under Greenberg...

GL nropp, always enjoy your threads

I would point under, just scared of all those "extra" opportunities that lead to more points.

GL
Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Edit
Quote Originally Posted by Rollbama1237:

The points do look tempting, but VT has been an absolute money pit this season (6-14 ATS). Promised myself that the Duke game was the last time I would side with the Hokies this season. 

Not playing either side of that one, but how do you feel about the under? 4 of the last 5 matchups between these two have played well under 127, and VT playing as slow as it ever has under Greenberg...

GL nropp, always enjoy your threads

I would point under, just scared of all those "extra" opportunities that lead to more points.

GL
 
nropp11
nropp11
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 7963
Posted: Feb. 16, 2012 - 3:20 PM ET #28

Quote Originally Posted by TBadour1:

That was a good spot for GTech so I can understand the line movement there. This game is different in my opinion. The line in should have been more like FSU by 7.5 and now moving to 10 is begging for VT $$$. FSU dominates


We can agree to disagree. I'll keep capping the teams that take the court that actually determine the outcome of a game. You keep capping the line movement.

GL
Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Edit
Quote Originally Posted by TBadour1:

That was a good spot for GTech so I can understand the line movement there. This game is different in my opinion. The line in should have been more like FSU by 7.5 and now moving to 10 is begging for VT $$$. FSU dominates


We can agree to disagree. I'll keep capping the teams that take the court that actually determine the outcome of a game. You keep capping the line movement.

GL
 
nropp11
nropp11
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 7963
Posted: Feb. 16, 2012 - 3:24 PM ET #29

Quote Originally Posted by RedRiver:

Solid as a rock! Was going to stay away from this one, but may need to reconsider. Nice pick last night, you saw right through that high chalk. You see any value with Denver 1H?

GL

Hard to not like Denver at home against a team that's taken part in two OT games within the past week coming into altitude (and 3 out of their 4 so far in February have gone to OT). Teams gotta be tired, and the altitude just might be the trick. Curious to see if they're able to go up and down as they normally do. I like it.

GL
Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Edit
Quote Originally Posted by RedRiver:

Solid as a rock! Was going to stay away from this one, but may need to reconsider. Nice pick last night, you saw right through that high chalk. You see any value with Denver 1H?

GL

Hard to not like Denver at home against a team that's taken part in two OT games within the past week coming into altitude (and 3 out of their 4 so far in February have gone to OT). Teams gotta be tired, and the altitude just might be the trick. Curious to see if they're able to go up and down as they normally do. I like it.

GL
 
nropp11
nropp11
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 7963
Posted: Feb. 16, 2012 - 3:30 PM ET #30

Quote Originally Posted by shakeandbake1:

hey nropp why do you like ole miss?? i like vandy and think their record is a little skewed because of their tough schedule..


post #5
Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Edit
Quote Originally Posted by shakeandbake1:

hey nropp why do you like ole miss?? i like vandy and think their record is a little skewed because of their tough schedule..


post #5
 
Gimmmethatjuice
Gimmmethatjuice
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 127
Posted: Feb. 16, 2012 - 3:45 PM ET #31

[Quote: Originally Posted by nropp11]

Hard to not like Denver at home against a team that's taken part in two OT games within the past week coming into altitude (and 3 out of their 4 so far in February have gone to OT). Teams gotta be tired, and the altitude just might be the trick. Curious to see if they're able to go up and down as they normally do. I like it.

Neil I love your analysis and you definitely know your stuff but saying a team is tired after two ot games and 3 out of 4 in Feb is just not accurate. Four games in 15 days whether they went to OT or not is nothing for a young kid.  I played college ball and there was pretty much never a spot where me or the guys went into a game and were tired.  The altitude will definitely have an affect but I can promise you the OT games will have no bearing.  Remember you are talking about 19-22 year old kids here a prime example is Uconn in the Big East Tourney last year. All everyone kept saying is well they have to be tired after two games in two nights, oh they have to tired after three games in three nights...never happened. Thanks for the Davidson analysis yesterday, talked me into a play. You and Kine are the real deal, thanks again for sharing with all of us. 
Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Edit
[Quote: Originally Posted by nropp11]

Hard to not like Denver at home against a team that's taken part in two OT games within the past week coming into altitude (and 3 out of their 4 so far in February have gone to OT). Teams gotta be tired, and the altitude just might be the trick. Curious to see if they're able to go up and down as they normally do. I like it.

Neil I love your analysis and you definitely know your stuff but saying a team is tired after two ot games and 3 out of 4 in Feb is just not accurate. Four games in 15 days whether they went to OT or not is nothing for a young kid.  I played college ball and there was pretty much never a spot where me or the guys went into a game and were tired.  The altitude will definitely have an affect but I can promise you the OT games will have no bearing.  Remember you are talking about 19-22 year old kids here a prime example is Uconn in the Big East Tourney last year. All everyone kept saying is well they have to be tired after two games in two nights, oh they have to tired after three games in three nights...never happened. Thanks for the Davidson analysis yesterday, talked me into a play. You and Kine are the real deal, thanks again for sharing with all of us. 
 
ZonaCats
ZonaCats
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 3600
Posted: Feb. 16, 2012 - 3:46 PM ET #32

Thoughts on these? 

Pitt
Zona
Duke
BC
SF
Oregon
Wash
Oreg St
Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Edit
Thoughts on these? 

Pitt
Zona
Duke
BC
SF
Oregon
Wash
Oreg St
 
nropp11
nropp11
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 7963
Posted: Feb. 16, 2012 - 3:54 PM ET #33

Quote Originally Posted by Gimmmethatjuice:

Quote Originally Posted by nropp11:


Hard to not like Denver at home against a team that's taken part in two OT games within the past week coming into altitude (and 3 out of their 4 so far in February have gone to OT). Teams gotta be tired, and the altitude just might be the trick. Curious to see if they're able to go up and down as they normally do. I like it.

Neil I love your analysis and you definitely know your stuff but saying a team is tired after two ot games and 3 out of 4 in Feb is just not accurate. Four games in 15 days whether they went to OT or not is nothing for a young kid.  I played college ball and there was pretty much never a spot where me or the guys went into a game and were tired.  The altitude will definitely have an affect but I can promise you the OT games will have no bearing.  Remember you are talking about 19-22 year old kids here a prime example is Uconn in the Big East Tourney last year. All everyone kept saying is well they have to be tired after two games in two nights, oh they have to tired after three games in three nights...never happened. Thanks for the Davidson analysis yesterday, talked me into a play. You and Kine are the real deal, thanks again for sharing with all of us. 

I may be over-estimating the fatigue effect, but you can't discount the fact that UL Lafayette is one of the fastest teams in the country travelling into altitude. Playing the prior games to OT is just an added bonus.

GL
Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Edit
Quote Originally Posted by Gimmmethatjuice:

Quote Originally Posted by nropp11:


Hard to not like Denver at home against a team that's taken part in two OT games within the past week coming into altitude (and 3 out of their 4 so far in February have gone to OT). Teams gotta be tired, and the altitude just might be the trick. Curious to see if they're able to go up and down as they normally do. I like it.

Neil I love your analysis and you definitely know your stuff but saying a team is tired after two ot games and 3 out of 4 in Feb is just not accurate. Four games in 15 days whether they went to OT or not is nothing for a young kid.  I played college ball and there was pretty much never a spot where me or the guys went into a game and were tired.  The altitude will definitely have an affect but I can promise you the OT games will have no bearing.  Remember you are talking about 19-22 year old kids here a prime example is Uconn in the Big East Tourney last year. All everyone kept saying is well they have to be tired after two games in two nights, oh they have to tired after three games in three nights...never happened. Thanks for the Davidson analysis yesterday, talked me into a play. You and Kine are the real deal, thanks again for sharing with all of us. 

I may be over-estimating the fatigue effect, but you can't discount the fact that UL Lafayette is one of the fastest teams in the country travelling into altitude. Playing the prior games to OT is just an added bonus.

GL
 
SoCal311
SoCal311
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 381
Posted: Feb. 16, 2012 - 4:09 PM ET #34

Hey Nroop11

What do you think bout the duke under 151 and washington under 132....Last 4 yrs duke under after feb 1st. 24-11 and washing 3out 0f 4 metting between these two teams has gone under.

Thanks for your thoughts

Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Edit

Hey Nroop11

What do you think bout the duke under 151 and washington under 132....Last 4 yrs duke under after feb 1st. 24-11 and washing 3out 0f 4 metting between these two teams has gone under.

Thanks for your thoughts

 
SoCal311
SoCal311
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 381
Posted: Feb. 16, 2012 - 4:11 PM ET #35

Sorry nropp11...
Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Edit
Sorry nropp11...
 
MitchC
MitchC
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 19
Posted: Feb. 16, 2012 - 4:37 PM ET #36

Maybe the young lads are not physically tired, but from a mental standpoint, close games, OT games are emotionally and mentally draining.  It seems to me that many of the plays Neil makes are combinations of teams that are coming off one of these and are due for an upward bounce in effort, and the expectation that their opponent could well be due for a drop off in effort, efficiency, etc.....

Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Edit
Maybe the young lads are not physically tired, but from a mental standpoint, close games, OT games are emotionally and mentally draining.  It seems to me that many of the plays Neil makes are combinations of teams that are coming off one of these and are due for an upward bounce in effort, and the expectation that their opponent could well be due for a drop off in effort, efficiency, etc.....

 
Uvanate
Uvanate
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 33
Posted: Feb. 16, 2012 - 4:40 PM ET #37

As always a great write up, thanks for taking the time to break the games.  GL
Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Edit
As always a great write up, thanks for taking the time to break the games.  GL
 
TheMattadore978
TheMattadore978
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 498
Posted: Feb. 16, 2012 - 4:51 PM ET #38

Hey Neil,

Curious how your record breaks down by conference? I know it would take sometime to put together but theres gotta be a degenerate follower out there who could pull it together.

Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Edit
Hey Neil,

Curious how your record breaks down by conference? I know it would take sometime to put together but theres gotta be a degenerate follower out there who could pull it together.

 
nuggetmonster
nuggetmonster
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 10566
Posted: Feb. 16, 2012 - 4:53 PM ET #39

Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Edit
 
nropp11
nropp11
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 7963
Posted: Feb. 16, 2012 - 4:55 PM ET #40

Quote Originally Posted by ZonaCats:

Thoughts on these? 

Pitt
Zona
Duke
BC
SF
Oregon
Wash
Oreg St

Pitt - probably their worst match-up in the conference from a physical standpoint. 

Arizona is just a weird game. They hit 15 three's the first time around, and that was the game that Aden went down in a few weeks back so WSU's had some time to get use to not having him in the lineup whereas the 2H of that one they didn't have any experience with that. Been a roady they always struggle with, even the wins have been ugly. Gun to my head, I'd probably point Arizona but if I had to make a guess, Washington State probably won't play a zone considering the first game results.

Like Duke. NC State doesn't defend 3 well, and this game should be ultra-fast. I like NC State's size at the guard position, but if you don't defend well, then it's useless.

I'm not a big fan of BC. Second game of roady off a physical defense and snail into a faster setting against a team that can fill it up at times.

San Fran was the first game I crossed off. Line doesn't make sense. I know BYU has some issues in terms of a few injuries, but these are just two different teams. San Fran has looked good as of late, but they haven't competed with any of the "uppers" in the WCC. Granted, those were road games, but still. Team plays extremely fast, they'll have more athleticism, but eh. I just didn't look into it as much as I probably should have. Home court? Not sure how much they will have. BYU's been selling out all of these small gyms b/c they're fans travel so much. 

Oregon I'm not really interested. Been playing better, but Cal's the cream of the crop here. When Cal shows up, they're extremely tough to score on.

Think Washington should show up again and make some noise now they're at home, just not confident laying that big of a # if this game gets slowed down to pulp.

And for the first time this year, I can see some value on Oregon State finally but sandwiched in between Washington and Cal is a slight concern.

Pac-12 

GL
Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Edit
Quote Originally Posted by ZonaCats:

Thoughts on these? 

Pitt
Zona
Duke
BC
SF
Oregon
Wash
Oreg St

Pitt - probably their worst match-up in the conference from a physical standpoint. 

Arizona is just a weird game. They hit 15 three's the first time around, and that was the game that Aden went down in a few weeks back so WSU's had some time to get use to not having him in the lineup whereas the 2H of that one they didn't have any experience with that. Been a roady they always struggle with, even the wins have been ugly. Gun to my head, I'd probably point Arizona but if I had to make a guess, Washington State probably won't play a zone considering the first game results.

Like Duke. NC State doesn't defend 3 well, and this game should be ultra-fast. I like NC State's size at the guard position, but if you don't defend well, then it's useless.

I'm not a big fan of BC. Second game of roady off a physical defense and snail into a faster setting against a team that can fill it up at times.

San Fran was the first game I crossed off. Line doesn't make sense. I know BYU has some issues in terms of a few injuries, but these are just two different teams. San Fran has looked good as of late, but they haven't competed with any of the "uppers" in the WCC. Granted, those were road games, but still. Team plays extremely fast, they'll have more athleticism, but eh. I just didn't look into it as much as I probably should have. Home court? Not sure how much they will have. BYU's been selling out all of these small gyms b/c they're fans travel so much. 

Oregon I'm not really interested. Been playing better, but Cal's the cream of the crop here. When Cal shows up, they're extremely tough to score on.

Think Washington should show up again and make some noise now they're at home, just not confident laying that big of a # if this game gets slowed down to pulp.

And for the first time this year, I can see some value on Oregon State finally but sandwiched in between Washington and Cal is a slight concern.

Pac-12 

GL
 
nropp11
nropp11
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 7963
Posted: Feb. 16, 2012 - 4:58 PM ET #41

Quote Originally Posted by SoCal311:

Hey Nroop11

What do you think bout the duke under 151 and washington under 132....Last 4 yrs duke under after feb 1st. 24-11 and washing 3out 0f 4 metting between these two teams has gone under.

Thanks for your thoughts


If Duke and NC State play to their strength, which is getting out in transition, then there should be some value in the over. NCST was lined at 159 at UNC, and the pitiful offensive display there is probably why there is value in an over here. Duke's offense is a bit better, and their defense definitely isn't. 

The other game really just depends on how much of the game ASU is going to be able to control.

GL
Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Edit
Quote Originally Posted by SoCal311:

Hey Nroop11

What do you think bout the duke under 151 and washington under 132....Last 4 yrs duke under after feb 1st. 24-11 and washing 3out 0f 4 metting between these two teams has gone under.

Thanks for your thoughts


If Duke and NC State play to their strength, which is getting out in transition, then there should be some value in the over. NCST was lined at 159 at UNC, and the pitiful offensive display there is probably why there is value in an over here. Duke's offense is a bit better, and their defense definitely isn't. 

The other game really just depends on how much of the game ASU is going to be able to control.

GL
 
nropp11
nropp11
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 7963
Posted: Feb. 16, 2012 - 5:00 PM ET #42

Quote Originally Posted by MitchC:

Maybe the young lads are not physically tired, but from a mental standpoint, close games, OT games are emotionally and mentally draining.  It seems to me that many of the plays Neil makes are combinations of teams that are coming off one of these and are due for an upward bounce in effort, and the expectation that their opponent could well be due for a drop off in effort, efficiency, etc.....


This. I should stress this. Fatigue and all of these spots that open up generally deal with the "mental" state as opposed to the physical. Lookaheads, letdowns, travel, fatigue etc...more mental than physical.

GL
Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Edit
Quote Originally Posted by MitchC:

Maybe the young lads are not physically tired, but from a mental standpoint, close games, OT games are emotionally and mentally draining.  It seems to me that many of the plays Neil makes are combinations of teams that are coming off one of these and are due for an upward bounce in effort, and the expectation that their opponent could well be due for a drop off in effort, efficiency, etc.....


This. I should stress this. Fatigue and all of these spots that open up generally deal with the "mental" state as opposed to the physical. Lookaheads, letdowns, travel, fatigue etc...more mental than physical.

GL
 
BiggDogg5n2
BiggDogg5n2
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 5914
Posted: Feb. 16, 2012 - 5:05 PM ET #43

BOL TODAY....
Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Edit
BOL TODAY....
 
Hokiefan40
Hokiefan40
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 105
Posted: Feb. 16, 2012 - 5:13 PM ET #44

I'm with you on VT +10.  I've been fading this team all season and have been making a lot of money doing it, but I can't see FSU beating us by 10.

Big Factor that will decide this game is if Davilla and Raines can keep FSU off the boards.  They combined for only FIVE rebounds last game.  OUR CENTERS GOT A TOTAL OF FIVE REBOUNDS!!!  If we can keep James off the boards, I think we could possibly win this one straight up.

And losing Barksdale should not worry you at all, He's good against lower tier opponents but struggles to score against guys bigger than him like Gibson and James.  Both Bernard James and Jon Henson had a field day with him, we're not losing much value here. 
Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Edit
I'm with you on VT +10.  I've been fading this team all season and have been making a lot of money doing it, but I can't see FSU beating us by 10.

Big Factor that will decide this game is if Davilla and Raines can keep FSU off the boards.  They combined for only FIVE rebounds last game.  OUR CENTERS GOT A TOTAL OF FIVE REBOUNDS!!!  If we can keep James off the boards, I think we could possibly win this one straight up.

And losing Barksdale should not worry you at all, He's good against lower tier opponents but struggles to score against guys bigger than him like Gibson and James.  Both Bernard James and Jon Henson had a field day with him, we're not losing much value here. 
 
bullmoose
bullmoose
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 2326
Posted: Feb. 16, 2012 - 5:29 PM ET #45

137.5 seems high for PSU/Ia game?
Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Edit
137.5 seems high for PSU/Ia game?
 
BayBridgeTunnel
BayBridgeTunnel
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 1387
Posted: Feb. 16, 2012 - 5:39 PM ET #46

I was with you on Davidson yesterday (posted in the game thread). Great insight on games. I'll be following you.
Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Edit
I was with you on Davidson yesterday (posted in the game thread). Great insight on games. I'll be following you.
 
FR3SH-like-UgHH
FR3SH-like-UgHH
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 3901
Posted: Feb. 16, 2012 - 5:40 PM ET #47

nropp, any concern w/ Greenberg not "letting out" a line-up(or is he serious) when he says "the 5 guys who practice the hardest will play"....what u think?
Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Edit
nropp, any concern w/ Greenberg not "letting out" a line-up(or is he serious) when he says "the 5 guys who practice the hardest will play"....what u think?
 
DOVJAK
DOVJAK
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 26031
Posted: Feb. 16, 2012 - 5:41 PM ET #48

Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Edit
 
jeroh
jeroh
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 232
Posted: Feb. 16, 2012 - 5:46 PM ET #49

any feel on wisky/msu? mich st is playing some of the best basketball of any team.. gut said wisky but i dont know if they can create enough offense against msu defense 
Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Edit
any feel on wisky/msu? mich st is playing some of the best basketball of any team.. gut said wisky but i dont know if they can create enough offense against msu defense 
 
 
ver310061
ver310061
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 78
Posted: Feb. 16, 2012 - 5:48 PM ET #50

Hello Neil, thanks for all your work.....

What are your thoughts on Michigan ST.....they have been killing competition at home...i also like the under in that game, i would not be surprised is Wisconsin does not score 50 points...

I like Denver too....... do you like the over 132 in that game?...i can see Denver scoring over 70 points by themselves....meaning that Lafayette
, as a fast team, should be close to 60 points....

Thanks again
Reply
Quote Post
0
Report User
Edit
Hello Neil, thanks for all your work.....

What are your thoughts on Michigan ST.....they have been killing competition at home...i also like the under in that game, i would not be surprised is Wisconsin does not score 50 points...

I like Denver too....... do you like the over 132 in that game?...i can see Denver scoring over 70 points by themselves....meaning that Lafayette
, as a fast team, should be close to 60 points....

Thanks again
All Forums | College Basketball
«First Previous 123 Next Last»

Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

  • Claiming Prizes 54,953 Covers arrow
  • Monday 09/29/2025 912 Covers arrow
  • 🏈🏈🏈 “To BEt, or not to BEt, that is the question” ...Fubah2's risky bets 236,454 Covers arrow
  • Tuesday 09/30/2025 1,121 Covers arrow
  • What the hell is a Bad Bunny? 2,012 Covers arrow
  • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 125,683 Covers arrow
  • Tracking thread 102,307 Covers arrow
  • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 175,978 Covers arrow
  • Im here to ruin the Bengals Broncos game. 2,639 Covers arrow
  • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 40,550 Covers arrow

Warning - External Link

Report User

Thank you for reporting
This content is abusive or harmful
This post is spam
An error has occurred
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Delete Post

Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

Remove Thread

Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

Scan Results

Login/Register

Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
Accounts are free and easy to create.

Search


Loading…

Loading…

About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Join our community today
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
19+
Gambling can be addictive, please play responsibly.
18+
Responsible Gaming
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Covers Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.