Trump and his evil rich education secretary who is a first class bitch(would rather call her something else, but wont) took out the classification of a nursing degree as a professional degree. What are these people smoking? Are they all doing don jrs coke? Nurses are the back bone of our entire health system and to take the professional label off nurses is flat out wrong and disgusting. Why are all of us letting these dumb ass republicans and magas dismantle and destroy our country? Enough is enough. My head boils when i hear the name maga, these are the fools that got this clown elected.
Lets get billionaires huge tax cuts, while taking access to the higher loan limits for nurses. Hell lets just do away with nurses altogether
If you are a living person, how any of you can sit back and say stuff like this isnt a big deal, am happy for trump. Then am sorry but you truly dont love this Country
No doubt my personal opinion is when this evil education secretary finally kicks the bucket, she will be serving eternity in hell with all the rest of the dirtbags
Trump and his evil rich education secretary who is a first class bitch(would rather call her something else, but wont) took out the classification of a nursing degree as a professional degree. What are these people smoking? Are they all doing don jrs coke? Nurses are the back bone of our entire health system and to take the professional label off nurses is flat out wrong and disgusting. Why are all of us letting these dumb ass republicans and magas dismantle and destroy our country? Enough is enough. My head boils when i hear the name maga, these are the fools that got this clown elected.
Lets get billionaires huge tax cuts, while taking access to the higher loan limits for nurses. Hell lets just do away with nurses altogether
If you are a living person, how any of you can sit back and say stuff like this isnt a big deal, am happy for trump. Then am sorry but you truly dont love this Country
No doubt my personal opinion is when this evil education secretary finally kicks the bucket, she will be serving eternity in hell with all the rest of the dirtbags
Trump administration threatens to limit access to student loan funding by designating professional programs as non-professional. For examples, nursing, social work, physician assistant and physical therapy. This risk worsening historic shortage of healthcare workers in the future. Problem is that in a plutocracy, billionaires want spending and income tax cuts at the expense of everyone else.
Trump administration threatens to limit access to student loan funding by designating professional programs as non-professional. For examples, nursing, social work, physician assistant and physical therapy. This risk worsening historic shortage of healthcare workers in the future. Problem is that in a plutocracy, billionaires want spending and income tax cuts at the expense of everyone else.
My mistake, trump is the greatest person to ever walk on this planet and he knows what all us peons need in life. Billionaires need more tax cuts, who gives a shit about getting good people involved in our healthcare system.
That evil rich education secretary and trump will both be living in hell when they die, thats a no brainer. And in that place there wont be magas thinking hes the worlds savior.
Its funny every time a i see or hear a maga, i feel like i need to go take a shower to get the awfulness off me.
My mistake, trump is the greatest person to ever walk on this planet and he knows what all us peons need in life. Billionaires need more tax cuts, who gives a shit about getting good people involved in our healthcare system.
That evil rich education secretary and trump will both be living in hell when they die, thats a no brainer. And in that place there wont be magas thinking hes the worlds savior.
Its funny every time a i see or hear a maga, i feel like i need to go take a shower to get the awfulness off me.
In war against science, Kennedy's anti-vaccine committee recklessly overhauls childhood vaccine policy that has been successful for decades. Before the 1980s, there were about 300,000 cases of hepatitis B every year in the US. In 2023, there were an estimated 14,000 cases. Now more Americans will be at risk of liver diseases in the future.
In war against science, Kennedy's anti-vaccine committee recklessly overhauls childhood vaccine policy that has been successful for decades. Before the 1980s, there were about 300,000 cases of hepatitis B every year in the US. In 2023, there were an estimated 14,000 cases. Now more Americans will be at risk of liver diseases in the future.
In war against science, Kennedy's anti-vaccine committee recklessly overhauls childhood vaccine policy that has been successful for decades. Before the 1980s, there were about 300,000 cases of hepatitis B every year in the US. In 2023, there were an estimated 14,000 cases. Now more Americans will be at risk of liver diseases in the future.
Please explain the bolded statement.
The "reckless" change is to stop giving the vaccine to newborns whose mother has tested negative and wait till the infant is 2 months old.
In war against science, Kennedy's anti-vaccine committee recklessly overhauls childhood vaccine policy that has been successful for decades. Before the 1980s, there were about 300,000 cases of hepatitis B every year in the US. In 2023, there were an estimated 14,000 cases. Now more Americans will be at risk of liver diseases in the future.
Please explain the bolded statement.
The "reckless" change is to stop giving the vaccine to newborns whose mother has tested negative and wait till the infant is 2 months old.
The "reckless" change is to stop giving the vaccine to newborns whose mother has tested negative and wait till the infant is 2 months old.
No evidence suggests vaccination at birth is risky. Hepatitis vaccine is given at birth because of risks and infection is especially dangerous at a young age. Testing during pregnancy may not guarantee the child will not be infected because of potential for false negative test results. The mother could acquire the virus later after testing. Many pregnant mothers do not receive testing. Half of all people infected may not be aware of their infections and could unknowingly infect others. Thus the risk is not zero. Since 1991, universal vaccination has decreased hepatitis infections in children by 99%.
The "reckless" change is to stop giving the vaccine to newborns whose mother has tested negative and wait till the infant is 2 months old.
No evidence suggests vaccination at birth is risky. Hepatitis vaccine is given at birth because of risks and infection is especially dangerous at a young age. Testing during pregnancy may not guarantee the child will not be infected because of potential for false negative test results. The mother could acquire the virus later after testing. Many pregnant mothers do not receive testing. Half of all people infected may not be aware of their infections and could unknowingly infect others. Thus the risk is not zero. Since 1991, universal vaccination has decreased hepatitis infections in children by 99%.
Trump and Kennedy repeal federal requirement that nursing homes maintain a registered nurse on duty 24/7. Since many homes are dangerously understaffed, this change increases risks of more infections, falls, emergencies and deaths. Seniors deserve far better.
Trump and Kennedy repeal federal requirement that nursing homes maintain a registered nurse on duty 24/7. Since many homes are dangerously understaffed, this change increases risks of more infections, falls, emergencies and deaths. Seniors deserve far better.
Trump and Kennedy repeal federal requirement that nursing homes maintain a registered nurse on duty 24/7. Since many homes are dangerously understaffed, this change increases risks of more infections, falls, emergencies and deaths. Seniors deserve far better.
The reversal comes months after a Texas federal judge vacated the provision, ruling that the 24/7 staffing requirement exceeded CMS’ authority. The agency did not appeal the decision, citing uncertainty caused by the ruling and challenges associated with implementation.
Industry groups that opposed the original mandate have welcomed the rollback.
“Today’s decision to repeal the one-size-fits-all staffing requirement in long-term care facilities is a good day for patients’ access to care,” Charlene MacDonald, executive vice president of public affairs at the Federation of American Hospitals, said in a statement shared with Becker’s. “This repeal rightfully reflects the reality that long-term care facilities are facing challenging workforce shortages. Rolling back this regulatory burden recognizes flexible staffing coupled with innovation improves the quality of care, reduces staff burnout and keeps facilities’ doors open.”
The American Hospital Association echoed those sentiments. In a Dec. 2 statement, Stacey Hughes, executive vice president for government relations and public policy, said the AHA “applauds” CMS’ repeal of the RN staffing requirement.
“The AHA has repeatedly raised concerns that the requirements could exacerbate workforce shortages, lead to facility closures and jeopardize access to care, especially in rural and underserved communities,” Ms. Hughes said. “Safe staffing… has always been about clinical judgment and flexibility to meet continually evolving patient needs rather than meeting arbitrary, one-size-fits-all numbers set by regulation.”
So a judge struck down the rule and Trump Admin didn't waste time appealing.
Trump and Kennedy repeal federal requirement that nursing homes maintain a registered nurse on duty 24/7. Since many homes are dangerously understaffed, this change increases risks of more infections, falls, emergencies and deaths. Seniors deserve far better.
The reversal comes months after a Texas federal judge vacated the provision, ruling that the 24/7 staffing requirement exceeded CMS’ authority. The agency did not appeal the decision, citing uncertainty caused by the ruling and challenges associated with implementation.
Industry groups that opposed the original mandate have welcomed the rollback.
“Today’s decision to repeal the one-size-fits-all staffing requirement in long-term care facilities is a good day for patients’ access to care,” Charlene MacDonald, executive vice president of public affairs at the Federation of American Hospitals, said in a statement shared with Becker’s. “This repeal rightfully reflects the reality that long-term care facilities are facing challenging workforce shortages. Rolling back this regulatory burden recognizes flexible staffing coupled with innovation improves the quality of care, reduces staff burnout and keeps facilities’ doors open.”
The American Hospital Association echoed those sentiments. In a Dec. 2 statement, Stacey Hughes, executive vice president for government relations and public policy, said the AHA “applauds” CMS’ repeal of the RN staffing requirement.
“The AHA has repeatedly raised concerns that the requirements could exacerbate workforce shortages, lead to facility closures and jeopardize access to care, especially in rural and underserved communities,” Ms. Hughes said. “Safe staffing… has always been about clinical judgment and flexibility to meet continually evolving patient needs rather than meeting arbitrary, one-size-fits-all numbers set by regulation.”
So a judge struck down the rule and Trump Admin didn't waste time appealing.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
