Seeing a lot of appeal on the over? I like the under considering no Tkachuk and buff can't score (yet), probably will get 10 tonight now that I've said that...
If you're playing the over... interested as in why?
Seeing a lot of appeal on the over? I like the under considering no Tkachuk and buff can't score (yet), probably will get 10 tonight now that I've said that...
If you're playing the over... interested as in why?
Seeing a lot of appeal on the over? I like the under considering no Tkachuk and buff can't score (yet), probably will get 10 tonight now that I've said that...
If you're playing the over... interested as in why?
Sens still have a lot of firepower without Brady. Sabres don’t have much on defense or in net. And ya I think the Sabres get off the schneid. Lots of pressure at home. They Score 2-3 goals.
no starter yet for Buffalo which isn’t a good thing. Sens should should score at least 3.
Sens still have a lot of firepower without Brady. Sabres don’t have much on defense or in net. And ya I think the Sabres get off the schneid. Lots of pressure at home. They Score 2-3 goals.
no starter yet for Buffalo which isn’t a good thing. Sens should should score at least 3.
I agree with your initial line of thinking but these game nowadays just don’t stay under like they used to. I see value in over 6-115. Small play for me BOL
I agree with your initial line of thinking but these game nowadays just don’t stay under like they used to. I see value in over 6-115. Small play for me BOL
As someone from the south that likes hockey, but doesn't follow steadily, I don't think I have ever seen a goal like that. It doesn't help my under!
Just wanted to have a small amount of action tonight, and then I get that...lol
As someone from the south that likes hockey, but doesn't follow steadily, I don't think I have ever seen a goal like that. It doesn't help my under!
Just wanted to have a small amount of action tonight, and then I get that...lol
@HomeDresser
You asked if you liked the over - explain the why .
I took Over 6 and a smaller play on over 7 for better odds . The reason why - I use patterns following sagarins rank and sched strength along with the opening line - it’s very nuanced but basically looking for patterns between the data points . There were similar patterns previously that had similar scenario and the common denominator - the results showed the game going over; the scores in those games 5-2; 3-4 . Once again it’s going deeper into the numbers and from patterns, recording results and doing accordingly - for me . Bol to you
@HomeDresser
You asked if you liked the over - explain the why .
I took Over 6 and a smaller play on over 7 for better odds . The reason why - I use patterns following sagarins rank and sched strength along with the opening line - it’s very nuanced but basically looking for patterns between the data points . There were similar patterns previously that had similar scenario and the common denominator - the results showed the game going over; the scores in those games 5-2; 3-4 . Once again it’s going deeper into the numbers and from patterns, recording results and doing accordingly - for me . Bol to you
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.