I am going to start off with the Value Ratings for teams 1-32 , and then I will get into my filtered game selections .
Value ratings are based on the method of the book GET IN AND WIN . This isnt my main way of handicapping , but I do find it interesting . To determine slots , I used the average of Covers , Massey , and Saragrin rankings . I also has to eyeball where I put the Jets , Packers , and Dolphins .
I am going to start off with the Value Ratings for teams 1-32 , and then I will get into my filtered game selections .
Value ratings are based on the method of the book GET IN AND WIN . This isnt my main way of handicapping , but I do find it interesting . To determine slots , I used the average of Covers , Massey , and Saragrin rankings . I also has to eyeball where I put the Jets , Packers , and Dolphins .
Now I used overall season to date to generate those scores . If I have time I am going to check the generated scores using last 3 games , and also do it from a defensive perspective , just to see what it says .
I did the score sheet wrong for week 10 slightly wrong , but I am going to backcheck , and see what it got right and wrong . I will check for winner and margin of victory .
Now I used overall season to date to generate those scores . If I have time I am going to check the generated scores using last 3 games , and also do it from a defensive perspective , just to see what it says .
I did the score sheet wrong for week 10 slightly wrong , but I am going to backcheck , and see what it got right and wrong . I will check for winner and margin of victory .
For observation purposes mva4 is offensive inertia from the previous weeks . I dont know if it is worth looking at mva5 and mva3 and comparing it to mva4 .
Basically its a slight lean towards the Titans .
Titans have a tempo of -10 and the Colts have a tempo of - 8.5 A negative tempo is a bad sign for cover potential .
At this point I am skipping this selection . Avoiding low potential bets is also important part of this method .
For observation purposes mva4 is offensive inertia from the previous weeks . I dont know if it is worth looking at mva5 and mva3 and comparing it to mva4 .
Basically its a slight lean towards the Titans .
Titans have a tempo of -10 and the Colts have a tempo of - 8.5 A negative tempo is a bad sign for cover potential .
At this point I am skipping this selection . Avoiding low potential bets is also important part of this method .
I forgot to mention the safety margin bet threshold is 15 % .
And just thinking out loud , I am probably going to drop the score sheet predictor , as I think its not worth the trouble .
I also forgot to post my new metrics , dp aka defensive potential and rza aka red zone attempts . I am also adding observation filters to rza like red zone for and red zone delta , just in case . My guess is there is a threshold for rzf or rzd to lower or raise bet level .
I am still learning how to incorporate dp and rza . Right now take the higher metric in that category .
Colts dp = 11.55 rza = 3.5
Titans dp = 13.96 rza = 3.25
From initial observations , a dp below 15 is a bad sign , and both teams have that bad sign . And for the Titans cover side , they have the lower rza , which would lower the bet confidence if this was a pick .
I forgot to mention the safety margin bet threshold is 15 % .
And just thinking out loud , I am probably going to drop the score sheet predictor , as I think its not worth the trouble .
I also forgot to post my new metrics , dp aka defensive potential and rza aka red zone attempts . I am also adding observation filters to rza like red zone for and red zone delta , just in case . My guess is there is a threshold for rzf or rzd to lower or raise bet level .
I am still learning how to incorporate dp and rza . Right now take the higher metric in that category .
Colts dp = 11.55 rza = 3.5
Titans dp = 13.96 rza = 3.25
From initial observations , a dp below 15 is a bad sign , and both teams have that bad sign . And for the Titans cover side , they have the lower rza , which would lower the bet confidence if this was a pick .
I just noticed the Value Ratings had the Colts Titans below the bet safety margin of 15 % , so it interesting two methods i use had this game as a skip .
Once I have the chance , I am going to backcheck on the mva grade cover rate , like how well does a D+ or B- cover . And a low gpa indicating a low margin held up also .
I just noticed the Value Ratings had the Colts Titans below the bet safety margin of 15 % , so it interesting two methods i use had this game as a skip .
Once I have the chance , I am going to backcheck on the mva grade cover rate , like how well does a D+ or B- cover . And a low gpa indicating a low margin held up also .
Browns mva5 = 1.52 ( grade D ) mva4 = 1.35 ( grade D - ) mva3 = 1.30 ( grade D - ) mvar = 1.23 ( grade D )
Bengals mva5 = 1.92 ( grade C ) mva4 = 1.73 ( grade C - ) mva3 = 1.67 ( grade D + ) mvar = 1.77 ( grade C - )
The lean is towards the Bengals since they have the higher mvar . As you can see the Bengals have a declining performance level .
The Bengals have a tempo of - 5.5 , and the Browns have a tempo of 1.5 .
The Bengals have a defensive potential of 24. 45 , and the Browns have a defensive potential of 15.12 . The Bengals have the better dp .
The Bengals have the better red zone attempts at 3.00 compared to the Browns at 2.25 . For observation purposes the Bengals have a red zone made of 2.00 , and the Browns have a red zone made of 1.5 . So that gives the Bengals a red zone delta of 1.00 and the Browns have a red zone delta of 0.75 .
My regular betting method is to start with mvr , and then raise or lower bet level confidence on things like tempo , dp , etc but I am just going to assign Bengals the BRONZE category .
If the Bengals had a positive tempo , this selection would be at least Silver .
Just for comparison , the Value Ratings had this game as a skip , factoring in bet margin safety , and it had the Bengals by a point margin of at least 10 .
I am also going to check what Saragrin's ELO has for this game .
As a reminder my current bet confidence categories are Bronze , Silver , Gold . In the future , I hope to expand this to Copper , Bronze , Silver , Gold , Platinum , Diamond .
Browns mva5 = 1.52 ( grade D ) mva4 = 1.35 ( grade D - ) mva3 = 1.30 ( grade D - ) mvar = 1.23 ( grade D )
Bengals mva5 = 1.92 ( grade C ) mva4 = 1.73 ( grade C - ) mva3 = 1.67 ( grade D + ) mvar = 1.77 ( grade C - )
The lean is towards the Bengals since they have the higher mvar . As you can see the Bengals have a declining performance level .
The Bengals have a tempo of - 5.5 , and the Browns have a tempo of 1.5 .
The Bengals have a defensive potential of 24. 45 , and the Browns have a defensive potential of 15.12 . The Bengals have the better dp .
The Bengals have the better red zone attempts at 3.00 compared to the Browns at 2.25 . For observation purposes the Bengals have a red zone made of 2.00 , and the Browns have a red zone made of 1.5 . So that gives the Bengals a red zone delta of 1.00 and the Browns have a red zone delta of 0.75 .
My regular betting method is to start with mvr , and then raise or lower bet level confidence on things like tempo , dp , etc but I am just going to assign Bengals the BRONZE category .
If the Bengals had a positive tempo , this selection would be at least Silver .
Just for comparison , the Value Ratings had this game as a skip , factoring in bet margin safety , and it had the Bengals by a point margin of at least 10 .
I am also going to check what Saragrin's ELO has for this game .
As a reminder my current bet confidence categories are Bronze , Silver , Gold . In the future , I hope to expand this to Copper , Bronze , Silver , Gold , Platinum , Diamond .
Ravens mva5 = 1.91 ( grade C ) mva4 = 1.71 ( grade C - ) mva3 = 1.81 ( grade C ) mvar = 1.81 ( grade C )
Bears mva5 = 1.87 ( grade C ) mva4 = 1.81 ( grade C ) mva3 = 1.60 ( grade D + ) mvar = 1.76 ( grade C - )
Originally I thought mva5 and mva3 had solved my spike performance problem , but now I am not so sure . For now , I am going back to rely on mva4 as my starting point , which for this game is the Bears .
The Bears have a tempo of 10 , and the Ravens have a tempo of 0 . Nudge for the Bears .
The Bears have a dp of 11.90 , and the Ravens have a dp of 22.72 . Nudge for the Ravens . Dp of 11.90 is a red flag .
The Bears have a rza of 3.75 , and the Ravens have a rza of 2.75 Nudge for the Bears .
Usually these nudges would bump up the bet confidence level , but as dp and rza are new metrics for me , I will just take their nudges as reinforcement .
Bears Bronze
Btw Saragrin has ELO Bears 20.22 and ELO Ravens 18.01 , which indicates a Bengals win .
Ravens mva5 = 1.91 ( grade C ) mva4 = 1.71 ( grade C - ) mva3 = 1.81 ( grade C ) mvar = 1.81 ( grade C )
Bears mva5 = 1.87 ( grade C ) mva4 = 1.81 ( grade C ) mva3 = 1.60 ( grade D + ) mvar = 1.76 ( grade C - )
Originally I thought mva5 and mva3 had solved my spike performance problem , but now I am not so sure . For now , I am going back to rely on mva4 as my starting point , which for this game is the Bears .
The Bears have a tempo of 10 , and the Ravens have a tempo of 0 . Nudge for the Bears .
The Bears have a dp of 11.90 , and the Ravens have a dp of 22.72 . Nudge for the Ravens . Dp of 11.90 is a red flag .
The Bears have a rza of 3.75 , and the Ravens have a rza of 2.75 Nudge for the Bears .
Usually these nudges would bump up the bet confidence level , but as dp and rza are new metrics for me , I will just take their nudges as reinforcement .
Bears Bronze
Btw Saragrin has ELO Bears 20.22 and ELO Ravens 18.01 , which indicates a Bengals win .
Jets mva5 = 2.43 ( grade A - ) mva4 = 2.25 ( grade B ) mva3 = 2.49 ( grade A ) mvar = 2.39 ( grade A - )
Bills mva5 = 2.06 ( grade B - ) mva4 = 1.73 ( grade C - ) mva3 = 1.90 ( grade C ) mvar = 1.89 ( grade C )
So mva4 indicates the Jets .
The Jets have a tempo of - 4 and the Bills have a tempo of - 4 .
The Jets have a dp of 13.38 . and the Bills have a dp of 12.47 .
These are bad signs for both teams , so I will be skipping this game based on my metrics . This is like making a betting decision on which bad team will screw up more to lose the game .
Btw the Bills have the better rza , which might have nudged the bet confidence on the Jets lower .
Saragrin has the ELO Jets at 21.82 and ELO Bills 14.52 If you happen to have the Saragrin ELO ratings since week 4 , let me know .
Jets mva5 = 2.43 ( grade A - ) mva4 = 2.25 ( grade B ) mva3 = 2.49 ( grade A ) mvar = 2.39 ( grade A - )
Bills mva5 = 2.06 ( grade B - ) mva4 = 1.73 ( grade C - ) mva3 = 1.90 ( grade C ) mvar = 1.89 ( grade C )
So mva4 indicates the Jets .
The Jets have a tempo of - 4 and the Bills have a tempo of - 4 .
The Jets have a dp of 13.38 . and the Bills have a dp of 12.47 .
These are bad signs for both teams , so I will be skipping this game based on my metrics . This is like making a betting decision on which bad team will screw up more to lose the game .
Btw the Bills have the better rza , which might have nudged the bet confidence on the Jets lower .
Saragrin has the ELO Jets at 21.82 and ELO Bills 14.52 If you happen to have the Saragrin ELO ratings since week 4 , let me know .
As you can see from above , a general guideline is teams which have an inertia of at least a B or even C+ should have a postive tempo . So this is indication something is still out of whack when using my metrics on Jets games . Also their defensive potential should be higher .
Which brings us to Redskins Eagles - 4.5
Redskins mva5 = 2.71 ( grade A + ) mva4 = 3.03 ( grade A + ) mva3 = 2.75 ( grade A + ) mvar = 2.83 ( grade A + )
At this point , I am thinking have the Redskins had easy covers the last several games ? This should lower the bet confidence on the Redskins side .
Knowledge isnt power . Its the application of knowledge that is power .
Eagles mva5 = 2.49 ( grade A ) mva4 = 2.29 ( grade B + ) mva3 = 2.40 ( grade A + ) mvar = 2.56 ( grade A + )
So we have got an initial lean on the Eagles .
The Eagles have a tempo - 3.5 , and the Redskins have a tempo of -1 . We are looking for positive tempo . I was thinking of putting money on the Eagles side , but now I am not .
The Eagles have a dp of 36.78 , which passes the 15 threshold . The Redskins have a dp of 7.35 , which is really really bad bad .
Based on these metrics , this game will probably have a lot of lead changes or be a blowout .
The Redskins have the better rza of 4.25 compared to the Eagles 2.75 , which is neutral at best for the eagles side bet confidence .
Saragrin ELO Eagles = 21.82 ELO Redskins 16.76
Using the eyeball test and my super genius brain power , I am putting this bet at Eagles BRONZE .
As you can see from above , a general guideline is teams which have an inertia of at least a B or even C+ should have a postive tempo . So this is indication something is still out of whack when using my metrics on Jets games . Also their defensive potential should be higher .
Which brings us to Redskins Eagles - 4.5
Redskins mva5 = 2.71 ( grade A + ) mva4 = 3.03 ( grade A + ) mva3 = 2.75 ( grade A + ) mvar = 2.83 ( grade A + )
At this point , I am thinking have the Redskins had easy covers the last several games ? This should lower the bet confidence on the Redskins side .
Knowledge isnt power . Its the application of knowledge that is power .
Eagles mva5 = 2.49 ( grade A ) mva4 = 2.29 ( grade B + ) mva3 = 2.40 ( grade A + ) mvar = 2.56 ( grade A + )
So we have got an initial lean on the Eagles .
The Eagles have a tempo - 3.5 , and the Redskins have a tempo of -1 . We are looking for positive tempo . I was thinking of putting money on the Eagles side , but now I am not .
The Eagles have a dp of 36.78 , which passes the 15 threshold . The Redskins have a dp of 7.35 , which is really really bad bad .
Based on these metrics , this game will probably have a lot of lead changes or be a blowout .
The Redskins have the better rza of 4.25 compared to the Eagles 2.75 , which is neutral at best for the eagles side bet confidence .
Saragrin ELO Eagles = 21.82 ELO Redskins 16.76
Using the eyeball test and my super genius brain power , I am putting this bet at Eagles BRONZE .
Lions mva5 = 1.71 ( grade C - ) mva4 = 1.77 ( grade C - ) mva3 = 1.73 ( grade C - ) mvar = 1.73 ( grade C - )
Steelers mva5 = 2.04 ( grade C + ) mva4 = 2.00 ( grade C + ) mva3 = 1.66 ( grade D + ) mvar = 1.90 ( grade C )
Looking at the numbers , we have a Steelers team on the decline , and a Lions team at a steady albiet C- . I believe will experience a short term upswing with their win at the Bears putting them in the division drivers seat .
So we start with the Lions side .
The Lions have a tempo of 1 , and the Steelers have a tempo of -12 . Thats a very bad sign for the Steelers to cover .
The Lions have a dp of 19.23 , and the Steelers have a dp of 11.95 . Using the 15 threshold rule , thats another bad sign for the Steelers .
The Lions have a rza of 3.75 and the Steelers have a rza of 4.00 I am keeping track of red zones made and red zone delta , which I see how much this red zone segment relates to cover potential . My current guess red zones made becomes a threshold factor at some point , after looking for the better red zone attempts .
Saragrin ELO Lions 24.02 Steelers 14.09
Lions Silver
Based on the topbets line , I may put actual money on the Lions . In the past , I have intentionally not put money on my to keep my mind clear and calm . But I think I have the core rules going , so I may be putting money on side bets using my system .
Lions mva5 = 1.71 ( grade C - ) mva4 = 1.77 ( grade C - ) mva3 = 1.73 ( grade C - ) mvar = 1.73 ( grade C - )
Steelers mva5 = 2.04 ( grade C + ) mva4 = 2.00 ( grade C + ) mva3 = 1.66 ( grade D + ) mvar = 1.90 ( grade C )
Looking at the numbers , we have a Steelers team on the decline , and a Lions team at a steady albiet C- . I believe will experience a short term upswing with their win at the Bears putting them in the division drivers seat .
So we start with the Lions side .
The Lions have a tempo of 1 , and the Steelers have a tempo of -12 . Thats a very bad sign for the Steelers to cover .
The Lions have a dp of 19.23 , and the Steelers have a dp of 11.95 . Using the 15 threshold rule , thats another bad sign for the Steelers .
The Lions have a rza of 3.75 and the Steelers have a rza of 4.00 I am keeping track of red zones made and red zone delta , which I see how much this red zone segment relates to cover potential . My current guess red zones made becomes a threshold factor at some point , after looking for the better red zone attempts .
Saragrin ELO Lions 24.02 Steelers 14.09
Lions Silver
Based on the topbets line , I may put actual money on the Lions . In the past , I have intentionally not put money on my to keep my mind clear and calm . But I think I have the core rules going , so I may be putting money on side bets using my system .
Does this line look off ? I would think the Chargers would be a bigger favorite . Thats just my initial thought before I do the number crunching .
Chargers mva5 = 2.93 ( grade A + ) mva4 = 3.28 ( grade A + ) mva3 = 3.25 ( grade A + ) mvar = 3.15 ( grade A + )
The Chargers did cover with the Colts , and hung with the Broncos for most of the game , so I think those numbers are basically legit when playing a below average team like the Dolphins .
Dolphins mva5 = 1.53 ( grade C ) mva4 = 1.44 ( grade D ) mva3 = 1.84 ( grade C ) mvar = 1.62 ( grade D )
Lean towards the Chargers .
The Chargers have a tempo of 4.5 , and the Dolphins have a tempo of 0.5
At this point , the Chargers are in the Silver bet category .
The Chargers have the better dp of 18.78 , compared to the Dolphins 15.28
The Chargers and Dolphins have a rza of 3.5 .
No red flags there , so Chargers Silver .
This is another game I might put money on , if Topbet has a good line .
Does this line look off ? I would think the Chargers would be a bigger favorite . Thats just my initial thought before I do the number crunching .
Chargers mva5 = 2.93 ( grade A + ) mva4 = 3.28 ( grade A + ) mva3 = 3.25 ( grade A + ) mvar = 3.15 ( grade A + )
The Chargers did cover with the Colts , and hung with the Broncos for most of the game , so I think those numbers are basically legit when playing a below average team like the Dolphins .
Dolphins mva5 = 1.53 ( grade C ) mva4 = 1.44 ( grade D ) mva3 = 1.84 ( grade C ) mvar = 1.62 ( grade D )
Lean towards the Chargers .
The Chargers have a tempo of 4.5 , and the Dolphins have a tempo of 0.5
At this point , the Chargers are in the Silver bet category .
The Chargers have the better dp of 18.78 , compared to the Dolphins 15.28
The Chargers and Dolphins have a rza of 3.5 .
No red flags there , so Chargers Silver .
This is another game I might put money on , if Topbet has a good line .
Overall I went 3-2-1 . I am disappointed that my silver picks went 0-2 , especially since I put money on those selections . I think my newest metric defensive potential is helping me out . Tempo is also helping out on skipping teams . The 5 game and 3 game moving averages are still a work in progress . Maybe I should do 2 out of 3 minimum edge on mva ...
Overall I went 3-2-1 . I am disappointed that my silver picks went 0-2 , especially since I put money on those selections . I think my newest metric defensive potential is helping me out . Tempo is also helping out on skipping teams . The 5 game and 3 game moving averages are still a work in progress . Maybe I should do 2 out of 3 minimum edge on mva ...
For those wondering why I skipped the Pats Panthers game , I had a feeling my metrics would be off on the Panthers, rating them too high , and wouldnt you know it, they covered .
I may do an unofficial post on the numbers , just to see what they would have said .
I am glad I didnt put money on this game , as I would have bet the Pats .
For those wondering why I skipped the Pats Panthers game , I had a feeling my metrics would be off on the Panthers, rating them too high , and wouldnt you know it, they covered .
I may do an unofficial post on the numbers , just to see what they would have said .
I am glad I didnt put money on this game , as I would have bet the Pats .
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.