All Forums | NFL Betting

Draft

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 605
Posts: 14
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 40
Posted: #1
who should be drafted. Please dont say mcfadden(inconsistent/wimp)
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 8290
Posted: #2
Whaaaaaaaaaaaat??????????
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 40
Posted: #3
who should be drafted first.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2004
Posts: 4804
Posted: #4
Chris Long
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 532
Posted: #5
Chris Long without a doubt
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 896
Posted: #6
Everyone says Chris Long hoping McFadden will drop to their team

I think Chris Long is a great player though
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 6180
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by dfk711:

Everyone says Chris Long hoping McFadden will drop to their team

I think Chris Long is a great player though

What teams in the top 10 really need a RB though? The Raiders and Jets? I'm a Jets fan and my thinking is that they bolstered the O-line so they don't have to take McFadden and Thomas Jones can do what he's capable of. Jets should take Gholston. My worst fear is they pass on him and NE takes him with the next pick and he becomes another Patriots standout. And the Raiders should take Jake Long if he is there. Probably just rumor but supposedly Jerry Jones has a hard-on for McFadden. Maybe they package their two first rounders or one and Barber III to move up? I doubt it but you never know.

 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 2996
Posted: #8
First pick should be either Chris Long or Jake Long. Nobody else should even be considered, except for Matt Ryan. I honestly wouldn't draft McFadden in the top 10 because there are plenty of good RB's, and Mendenhall seems like he could be the best RB from this class anyways.

I'm hoping the Vikings get Harvey with their pick, but I doubt he'll drop that far. Chad Henne wouldn't be a bad pick either.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 10057
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by -Chase-:

First pick should be either Chris Long or Jake Long. Nobody else should even be considered, except for Matt Ryan. I honestly wouldn't draft McFadden in the top 10 because there are plenty of good RB's, and Mendenhall seems like he could be the best RB from this class anyways.

I'm hoping the Vikings get Harvey with their pick, but I doubt he'll drop that far. Chad Henne wouldn't be a bad pick either.

Chase, please tell me you are joking about Mcfadden, not being drafted in the top 10.Chase look at this guys numbers, come on man you must have something personal against this guy.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 4210
Posted: #10
Mendenhall is better and will be a better pro than Mcfadden.  In addition, Mcfadden has a huge tude on him.  Teams just love that.
 
Look at Cedric Benson's college numbers dipshit... Again, you don't have a clue about what you are talking about. 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 10057
Posted: #11
[Quote: Originally Posted by MDAAKD]
Mendenhall is better and will be a better pro than Mcfadden.  In addition, Mcfadden has a huge tude on him.  Teams just love that.
 
Look at Cedric Benson's college numbers dipshit... Again, you don't have a clue about what you are talking about. 

Again, you are a stupid ass to compare Mcfadden to Cedric Benson.Two totally different style of running dumb ass.Anyone onhere can see that,so just stay out of here and pay your fuckin student loans.

 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 2996
Posted: #12
Quote Originally Posted by saintsfan504:

Chase, please tell me you are joking about Mcfadden, not being drafted in the top 10.Chase look at this guys numbers, come on man you must have something personal against this guy.

He has impressive numbers yes, but there are TONS of good running backs. It's a waste of a top pick in my opinion. Yes the Vikings drafted AP in the top 10 last year and it worked, but Peterson is a much better back than McFadden, and even the analyst's that are in love with D-Mac know he is no Peterson. Mendenhall strikes me as the better NFL back, but we'll see.

When you look at the top 10 picks, the only teams that you could make a case for needing a back is Oakland and New York. Oakland has tons of decent back though and just signed Fargas, and New York has a good tandem with Washington and Jones. They'd both be better off drafting someone like Dorsey, Gholston or Ellis.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2005
Posts: 5073
Posted: #13
Compare McFadden to Bush. Now, do you think Bush will have the career to justify the #2 pick when he came out. You can't honestly say Dmac is going to better than Bush, and vice versa. Same kind of player, which to me, isn't worth a top 10 pick.
 
I love Dorsey. Hoping my Rams get him at #2.
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 4210
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by saintsfan504:

Quote Originally Posted by MDAAKD:

Mendenhall is better and will be a better pro than Mcfadden.  In addition, Mcfadden has a huge tude on him.  Teams just love that.
 
Look at Cedric Benson's college numbers dipshit... Again, you don't have a clue about what you are talking about. 

Again, you are a stupid ass to compare Mcfadden to Cedric Benson.Two totally different style of running dumb ass.Anyone onhere can see that,so just stay out of here and pay your fuckin student loans.

It's making a comparison of hype not running style dumbass.  Again, I award you no points lil guy. 

All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.