All Forums | NFL Betting

DOES ANYONE KNOW THE TREND WHEN A TEAM WINS BY 20 or more back to back

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1702
Posts: 19
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 13189
Posted: #1
weeks and then I think the third week they lose straight up? Something like that
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 5266
Posted: #2
If a team wins back to back games by 20+ points, that team is (15-2 ATS) the next week.



 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 8779
Posted: #3
Quote Originally Posted by LOLKNBR:

If a team wins back to back games by 20+ points, that team is (15-2 ATS) the next week.


 

U SURE ABOUT THIS RECORD... Falcons smashed TB and lost straight to Vikings.

Pitts smashed Carolina and lost to TB.

but so will Gmen cover against falcons?

Will GB cover against Miami??

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 8681
Posted: #4
It depends how public on GB next game
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 13189
Posted: #5
I thought the lose straight up. MRBATOR mentioned it a while back
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 3677
Posted: #6

Quote Originally Posted by bpickin:

weeks and then I think the third week they lose straight up? Something like that

Thanks for reminding me on this trend bpickin
It goes as such:

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 13189
Posted: #8
They beat bears by 21 I think so it won't apply. I'm just trying to find out because it's bound to apply sooner or later.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 13189
Posted: #9
Oh oh scores 30 points, not wins by 30. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 4793
Posted: #10
For any trend that one may come up with that favors team "X"
there are multiple trends in the same game that favor team "Y"


If you look hard enough, actually not that hard you will find on each game both teams have favorable trends going for them.

Trends are pretty much meaningless.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 1633
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by MikeMed:

For any trend that one may come up with that favors team "X" there are multiple trends in the same game that favor team "Y"

If you look hard enough, actually not that hard, you will find on each game both teams have favorable trends going for them.

Trends are pretty much meaningless.

Exactly.  Someone who understands.  You can find trends that fit ANYTHING. ANYTHING at all.

Sorry, but I have to laugh at these clowns who follow them.

"Home teams with winning records that defeat a divisional opponent by 16 or more points the prior week, and face another divisional opponent in the upcoming week on the road, are 9-2 against the spread against non-divisional foes played in grass stadiums."

Give me a break.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2014
Posts: 52
Posted: #12
Use your football knowledge. A trend like that is such a stretch and rather ridiculous. Your football knowledge should help you make the best educated pick possible. It's about match ups and spreads, not trends. Do your best to pick with your brain and not your heart and you should do okay. Looking at a trend that ridiculous will have you out of money very fast. 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 13189
Posted: #13
MRBATOR HAD A GREAT TREND YEARS AGO WHICH IS THE ONLY TREND I AM REFERRING TO. DOES ANYONE KNOW THE TREND? IT WAS/IS VERY SUCCESSFUL.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2014
Posts: 188
Posted: #14

more like a system not a trend because this applies to all teams

 

it goes after one game when topping a 20 point or more margin of victory also depends who they are playing ......... if they get lucky and face a bad losing team like Raiders or Jaguars even in 3rd game they will wax the bad losers because the teams have zilch talent on all spots

NEW HC again new offensive corridinators new wtf QB's and they start out slow

 

Jags after a win of 20 points or more are 5-16 ATS 1-6 in div. games losing 2 s/u as a chalk

4-10 vs non div losing 3 /s/u as a chalk ......no games last year busting 20 pts margin

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 3677
Posted: #15
Quote Originally Posted by bpickin:

MRBATOR HAD A GREAT TREND YEARS AGO WHICH IS THE ONLY TREND I AM REFERRING TO. DOES ANYONE KNOW THE TREND? IT WAS/IS VERY SUCCESSFUL.
That is the trend I wrote in post #7 above 
That is from Bators post from I don't know when....
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 9317
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by NORCALPLAYA:

That didn't post right??? 
The trend is if a team scores 30+ points on another team & holds them to under 10 points for TWO weeks straight, you take the opponent the next week. Trend is 16-1 since 1989 and counting...
Last time I played this trend was the 2012-2013 Season
NYG crushed the Niners when 2 weeks prior the 9ers beat Buffalo 45-3 & the week prior the 49ers beat the Jets 34-0 (I take really good notes on a trend like this)

Being GB did not hold the Bears to UNDER 10 points, this trend does not apply. BUT the Packers will be in Miami next week, so it will be interesting to see if they do lose

GL


Close but not quite,
ATS:28-9 ATS 

Still good but like you said, last time it happened was 2012 season.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 9317
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by bpickin:

weeks and then I think the third week they lose straight up? Something like that

ATS:79-88-2 (-0.37, 47.3%)

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2014
Posts: 188
Posted: #18
ok league capper big differrence in trends vs systems

that thing you posted is when any team wins 2 games and only allows 10 points or less total that one is like 100%

this other one is also a system from OP because it applies to every team in nfl .

The trends occur within div. games or before div. games or after a win or loss vs a div. rival. and only are in effect to that team under certain specific conditions.

Hope i cleared things up here
 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 13189
Posted: #19
I think it was something like the team wins 2 Games in a row big and keeps the teams to 10 points or less then the 3rd game they lose straight up or something 
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.