Phil Jackson is 47-0 when winning game 1. Lakers were 14-0 when series was tied, whats your point? When you have something inelligent to say, please do, but those stats mean nothing.
Phil Jackson is 47-0 when winning game 1. Lakers were 14-0 when series was tied, whats your point? When you have something inelligent to say, please do, but those stats mean nothing.
Phil Jackson is 47-0 when winning game 1. Lakers were 14-0 when series was tied, whats your point? When you have something inelligent to say, please do, but those stats mean nothing.
Phil Jackson is 47-0 when winning game 1. Lakers were 14-0 when series was tied, whats your point? When you have something inelligent to say, please do, but those stats mean nothing.
you don't have to be a math wiz to know that 47-0 beats 11-0...
you don't have to be a math wiz to know that 47-0 beats 11-0...
How do I even go about this?
Larry Bird, Michael Jordan, Bob Cousy, Shaq and many others were involved in these stats. How relevant can they really be?
Here's another stat for you...
The Lakers are 1-0 in their last one NBA Finals.
Basically...48-0 stat and the 11-0 stat are as meaningless as the one I just posted.
How do I even go about this?
Larry Bird, Michael Jordan, Bob Cousy, Shaq and many others were involved in these stats. How relevant can they really be?
Here's another stat for you...
The Lakers are 1-0 in their last one NBA Finals.
Basically...48-0 stat and the 11-0 stat are as meaningless as the one I just posted.
This Celtics team is 1-0 when leading 3-2 in a finals series.
Who honestly gives a shit what happened with the Celtics 20 years ago... does that really affect the Celtics team now? Give me a $#Q$% break.
This Celtics team is 1-0 when leading 3-2 in a finals series.
Who honestly gives a shit what happened with the Celtics 20 years ago... does that really affect the Celtics team now? Give me a $#Q$% break.
you don't have to be a math wiz to know that 47-0 beats 11-0...
you don't have to be a math wiz to know that 47-0 beats 11-0...
Funny how you limited the 3-2 C's lead to just NBA Finals.
Very convenient to ignore that Celtics were 32-0 in any series before last year against the Magic.
But who cares about 47-0 and 32-1. MJ and Bird aren't playing.
Funny how you limited the 3-2 C's lead to just NBA Finals.
Very convenient to ignore that Celtics were 32-0 in any series before last year against the Magic.
But who cares about 47-0 and 32-1. MJ and Bird aren't playing.
There is HUGEEE point that the stat is missing. How many of those 32 3-2 series leads was the format 2-3-2??
The answer is 0. This is important because in all those series, the Celtics had at least 1 home game remaining. In this case, the Celtics have no home games so the people who use this stat are just ridiculous.
There is HUGEEE point that the stat is missing. How many of those 32 3-2 series leads was the format 2-3-2??
The answer is 0. This is important because in all those series, the Celtics had at least 1 home game remaining. In this case, the Celtics have no home games so the people who use this stat are just ridiculous.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.