FIX # 2 SAME REF FROM 2008 PLAYOFFS

[/Quote

im not obe to ever comment on these whole fixed threads but ill will say that was really fishy and if it was it was nice that Most of the betting public was on the right side... cause if it was a fix the ref obviously didnt want denver to shoot 2 FT's to tie the game and have a really good shot a OT were dallas could have second chance to cover the spread... Gotta feel for those Dallas players you know damn well they think this is definetly a fix if i was on the team i would of... cause it was clearly a foul... I'll say this then im out... if Mark Wunderlich addreses media or makes any kind of statement about his at all, tha would be proof enough that he was involved in something to me, because if it truley was a mistake and he honestly missed a call which I don't believe he would accualy say nothing when questioned and just move on....  accualy i guess you could make the argument either way on that note... crazy shit though just glad i was on the right side....

probability about 92%

but it really helped some folks like me on the ML

Quote Originally Posted by risktaker:

yea i see where u coming from but melo still had to make a shot and u cant FIX that if he would have missed a shot nobody would on dallas said we fouled him it was a great shot if u ask me same can be said for spurs series last year if somehow berry would have hit that shot they wouldnt be complaining

Good point.... If melo misses that shot, no one on dallas says a thing...... BUT, melo had the open shot because the foul wasn't called and the defender was out of position..... the shooting percentage on a wide open shot is much higher than a contested, hand in your face shot....

your right but, if melo would have missed the 3 ball, i'm thinking that dallas would have gottan the rebound and denver would have been forced to foul with like 1-2 seconds left of the clock, ....

if dallas was to hav hit both free throws(which they can't fuking do, cause they missed so many free throws yesterday it's crazy)

then they would ahve covered at least for me cause i had dallas at -3 1/2...

well i'm just saying that, that could have been the outcome instead a lose