Neither of these trade offers are official yet but I think both owners are interested if an offer was made.
1st Possible Trade: I Give: Deangelo Williams & Fred Jackson I Get: McFadden & probably Greg Little if I want him thrown in. This kills my RB depth, but then I could start Rice, McFadden, & Hightower. Right now I have to sit someone between Hightower & Fred Jackson.
2nd Possible Trade: I Give: Deangelo, Fred Jackson, & Fitzgerald I Get: Charles & Vincent Jackson So starting Rice, Charles, & Hightower.
Think I definitely like the first trade better. Are either worth making or should I just stand pat till the season starts?
Neither of these trade offers are official yet but I think both owners are interested if an offer was made.
1st Possible Trade: I Give: Deangelo Williams & Fred Jackson I Get: McFadden & probably Greg Little if I want him thrown in. This kills my RB depth, but then I could start Rice, McFadden, & Hightower. Right now I have to sit someone between Hightower & Fred Jackson.
2nd Possible Trade: I Give: Deangelo, Fred Jackson, & Fitzgerald I Get: Charles & Vincent Jackson So starting Rice, Charles, & Hightower.
Think I definitely like the first trade better. Are either worth making or should I just stand pat till the season starts?
There is no doubt the 1st trade is the better of the 2. The 2nd is not good at all. You are losing depth and downgrading receivers imo. I would make sure u get Little in that trade as well as he will be a surprise this year.
There is no doubt the 1st trade is the better of the 2. The 2nd is not good at all. You are losing depth and downgrading receivers imo. I would make sure u get Little in that trade as well as he will be a surprise this year.
There is no doubt the 1st trade is the better of the 2. The 2nd is not good at all. You are losing depth and downgrading receivers imo. I would make sure u get Little in that trade as well as he will be a surprise this year.
Do you not take the 2nd deal without Little included then?
There is no doubt the 1st trade is the better of the 2. The 2nd is not good at all. You are losing depth and downgrading receivers imo. I would make sure u get Little in that trade as well as he will be a surprise this year.
Do you not take the 2nd deal without Little included then?
Tough choice. McFadden has been injury proned & hightower is a risk which is nice to have jackson on the bench. Fitz is better than VJax and I wouldn't make that trade.
Not sure why you would want Little, he'll sit on your bench.
If you're confident in Hightower & really think McFadden can stay healthy, I'd make trade #1.
Tough choice. McFadden has been injury proned & hightower is a risk which is nice to have jackson on the bench. Fitz is better than VJax and I wouldn't make that trade.
Not sure why you would want Little, he'll sit on your bench.
If you're confident in Hightower & really think McFadden can stay healthy, I'd make trade #1.
The McFadden trade looks good. McFadden and Rice could be an unstoppable fantasy monster.
I would not take the risk for Charles or any Chiefs player. McCluster, Jones, and the Chiefs not having a QB make that a bad proposition. Also, Charles has high injury risk.
The McFadden trade looks good. McFadden and Rice could be an unstoppable fantasy monster.
I would not take the risk for Charles or any Chiefs player. McCluster, Jones, and the Chiefs not having a QB make that a bad proposition. Also, Charles has high injury risk.
The key is McFadden can become a top 10. If he pans out u have two top 10 rb's and a top 3 receiver basically I am saying I've up the safe 4-6rank team in league and hit the home run and beat all their asses
The key is McFadden can become a top 10. If he pans out u have two top 10 rb's and a top 3 receiver basically I am saying I've up the safe 4-6rank team in league and hit the home run and beat all their asses
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.