All Forums | College Football

Clemson at Wake Forest (10/25/2012)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 19232
Posts: 81
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2002
Posts: 61
Posted: #1

Away:  Clemson [5-2 ATS]
Home:  Wake Forest [4-3 ATS]

Game Time: 7:30 PM
Stadium: BB&T Field

Recent Meetings:
11/12/11 - WFRST 28 vs. CLEM 31
11/20/10 - CLEM 30 vs. WFRST 10
10/17/09 - WFRST 3 vs. CLEM 38

Team Leaders:

Clemson:
Passing: Tajh Boyd (1908)
Rushing: Andre Ellington (696)
Receiving: DeAndre Hopkins (845)

Wake Forest:
Passing: Tanner Price (1327)
Rushing: Josh Harris (432)
Receiving: Michael Campanaro (429)

More:
Live Odds
In-Depth Matchup Information
Consensus Betting Information

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 5818
Posted: #2
Offense, with just enough defense and its worked out pretty good so far for the Tigers.  However will a key turnover or 2 the Demon Deacons could cover?

Tigers are 1-4-1 ATS in their last 6 meetings in Wake Forest. FYI 

With that being said, my early lean is Clemson -13 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 99
Posted: #3
thinking of getting it now as that number may go up thoughts
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 13
Posted: #4

I was thinking about taking this game early as well...I would hate to wait and have it go up to 2 touchdowns.  I bet Clemson every week and it pays off, but I am unfamiliar with how they are going to play on a short week?  Does anyone have any stats on how teams usually do on short weeks?  I would think there would be less scoring.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5051
Posted: #5

 Away from Death Valley, on a short week, and against an opponent that the Tigers have had trouble with.......hmm? Tigers almost "mortal" on the road.

WAKE FOREST  + 12

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 168
Posted: #6
Early Lean wake forest.....
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 671
Posted: #7
Too many weapons for Clemson! WF doesnt stand a chance. CLEM lost to FSU by 12 WF didn't even score and lost by 52.

You Decide I'll take Orange...n
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 207
Posted: #8
line opened up -14 down to -12 wake tough at home.Id USE THEM IN A TEASER AND GET 22 OR 24 PTS.ALSO LIKE THE UNDER MY RECORD SPEAKS FOR ITSELF
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 948
Posted: #9
Wake isn't horrible. But the talent discrepency is fairly large. Coaching? Dabo is a mental midget, so Grobe wins that. Both teams should be focused. Leaning Clemson atm...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 18
Posted: #10
I feel like this is a trap game for Clemson. WF shouldnt be able to stay with in 2tds of Clemson.... Only way they stay close if they get so crazy turnovers. wild stuff always happens on Thursday night (not for Oregon last week though)... im on a roll and im going with Clemson -14...
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 671
Posted: #11
Clem Son! Word Life Son! Knowledge Born!!!!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 217
Posted: #12
why is line going down? 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 566
Posted: #13

Quote Originally Posted by Hazmat:

why is line going down? 

Probably because Vegas wants you to take Clemson.  Most of the money is going in one direction.  A WF cover is what they are looking at whcih helps the payout on the ML.  Could be wrong.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 4708
Posted: #14

Wake could win this game outright.. Clemson is always good for a sleep walk..

This is Wake bowl game..

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 77
Posted: #15
Clemson rolls here fellas. They win by 14+
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 12718
Posted: #16
mmm--- so all the jack asses , worried about another "suspect" line movement...shall i remind you last week  oregon vs ASU...only that ASU is better than WF ,and this year WF has been garbage, Clemson has  a rubbish deffense, but their offense can put up video game numbers on the board
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 94
Posted: #17
Hmmm. Clemson has been great for me this season. BUT.....A short week..Then To Duke who is at the top of the ACC who is now already bowl eligible. and haven't been there since 1994. It's hard to take WF in this one but I smell a cover here.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 5
Posted: #18
UNDERRRRRRRRR..................
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2005
Posts: 1433
Posted: #19
I don't see how Clemson doesn't roll over Wake Forest. The line movement is suspect, however, a reverse line movement is NOT a guarantee cover. It's possible this is a bluff move just to keep everyone on there toes. It's keeping me from taking Clemson so mission accomplished maybe?? However, it doesnt make any sense for the books to invite more action on a winning side ever so WTF.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 3
Posted: #20
Think the line is reflecting the Clemson defense losing another DB to injury! Def not good for their awful defense! Wake CAN score! Especially against Clemson! I'm thinking short week,even shorter week for the traveling team, No time to prepare,no defense! Clemson looking ahead to duke! (Crazy right) might wanna leave this one alone!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 72
Posted: #21
THIS IS A REPEAT OF LAST WEEK'S OREGON @ ARIZONA STATE. SMALL SPREAD...BIG COVER! BIG COVER!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 217
Posted: #22
the line move is so minimal i dont think it really matter.. till it jumps down to 10 ill jump.. 11.5, 12.. same diff to me.. you guys can duke it out but i think CLEMSON is the winna
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 7
Posted: #23
Wake is ranked #93 nationally in scoring and is averaging 13pts a game in ACC play.  Granted a goose egg against FSU, but they have also played most of the bottom dwellers.

I think like last Thursday this pick looks too easy, and I am happy to take advantage.

Quote Originally Posted by Crumbles:

Think the line is reflecting the Clemson defense losing another DB to injury! Def not good for their awful defense! Wake CAN score! Especially against Clemson! I'm thinking short week,even shorter week for the traveling team, No time to prepare,no defense! Clemson looking ahead to duke! (Crazy right) might wanna leave this one alone!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 1895
Posted: #24
Line movement is great as well as % of what people are on, but we dont know what that represents all of the time. Sometimes a better team just breaks people regardless. Too many weapons for Clemson. CLEMSON and OV for the large
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 61
Posted: #25
I've seen a few people who are cautious about Clemson cite that it's a 'short week'. Is it not a short week for Wake as well? WF Def has to prepare for a Clemson OFF that is light years ahead of Virginia's, their last opponent. Clemson DEF has to prepare for an offense that is without it's #1 receiver and that is #93 in scoring. I just don't see the 'short week' argument as very effective in this case. If anything, it's in the favor of Clemson.
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.