Went big on this one with a smaller amount on the badgers +16, anyone else?
Quite the RLM 85% is on the badgers but line has gone from +14 to +16. I think the sharps are wrong on this one I've watched every game for these two teams and I gotta say if you don't believe in scott tolzein yet you will after today wisco in a close one.
Went big on this one with a smaller amount on the badgers +16, anyone else?
Quite the RLM 85% is on the badgers but line has gone from +14 to +16. I think the sharps are wrong on this one I've watched every game for these two teams and I gotta say if you don't believe in scott tolzein yet you will after today wisco in a close one.
he looked pretty shaky on the road vs a shitty minnesota defense...i agree he looked lights out earlier in the year vs cupcakes and at home vs msu - but this today is an entirely different senario for him...im not sold on the guy just yet
he looked pretty shaky on the road vs a shitty minnesota defense...i agree he looked lights out earlier in the year vs cupcakes and at home vs msu - but this today is an entirely different senario for him...im not sold on the guy just yet
Wisc is 0-9 ATS vs good rush defenses over L2 seasons, avg score being 32-18, this is why the line is 14-15, hence the inability to compete with against good rush defenses...
If you take the 14.5 it should be very close. Should be no play, since the line is right on.
Wisc is 0-9 ATS vs good rush defenses over L2 seasons, avg score being 32-18, this is why the line is 14-15, hence the inability to compete with against good rush defenses...
If you take the 14.5 it should be very close. Should be no play, since the line is right on.
he looked pretty shaky on the road vs a shitty minnesota defense...i agree he looked lights out earlier in the year vs cupcakes and at home vs msu - but this today is an entirely different senario for him...im not sold on the guy just yet
very good point about tolzien on the road. in addition, john clay has started to run the ball well and frosh monte ball is seeing the ball as the scat back instead of z. brown.
the key is the running game. yes, UW is more balanced this year than in previous years, but if tolzien is forced into 3rd and 7+ consistently, i don't see him succeeding today. he needs to complete easy underneath routes to graham and toon on 1st and 2nd downs to give him confidence against this stingy OSU D early on.
this is coming from a recent UW grad, but i still think 16 is too much. i wouldn't take 5-1 on UW moneyline though
he looked pretty shaky on the road vs a shitty minnesota defense...i agree he looked lights out earlier in the year vs cupcakes and at home vs msu - but this today is an entirely different senario for him...im not sold on the guy just yet
very good point about tolzien on the road. in addition, john clay has started to run the ball well and frosh monte ball is seeing the ball as the scat back instead of z. brown.
the key is the running game. yes, UW is more balanced this year than in previous years, but if tolzien is forced into 3rd and 7+ consistently, i don't see him succeeding today. he needs to complete easy underneath routes to graham and toon on 1st and 2nd downs to give him confidence against this stingy OSU D early on.
this is coming from a recent UW grad, but i still think 16 is too much. i wouldn't take 5-1 on UW moneyline though
Wisc is 0-9 ATS vs good rush defenses over L2 seasons, avg score being 32-18, this is why the line is 14-15, hence the inability to compete with against good rush defenses...
If you take the 14.5 it should be very close. Should be no play, since the line is right on.
Wisc is 0-9 ATS vs good rush defenses over L2 seasons, avg score being 32-18, this is why the line is 14-15, hence the inability to compete with against good rush defenses...
If you take the 14.5 it should be very close. Should be no play, since the line is right on.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.