RoboCap – Selections for 11/1

A .500 outcome was had here last Saturday (9-9). Over nine weeks, just two were losers; though the record is far less compelling (66-59, .528). Evaluating each one for week #10, the box likes these:
1) Tennessee(-3)/Oklahoma
2) California (+5)/Virginia
3) MiddleTenn(+6)/JacksonvilleSt
4) Michigan(-21)/Purdue
5) Utah(-7)/Cincinnati
6) Texas(-3)/Vanderbilt
7) Stanford(+14)/Pittsburgh

The algorithm has shown some rank-value over the top eight, but has been gangbusters at the very top (7-2, .778). Statistically, the latter is a small sample size, so trust as you will.

We have 52 on the board this week, providing all of us tech cappers a mountain of opportunity.
Good luck,
TheKingfish

A small revision:
Tennessee(-2.5)/Oklahoma

I conveniently posted my full group on Wednesday because the Blue Raiders were going that night. However, I had not yet placed the Vols due to some vagaries observed in the odds. I got them at -105 this morning, but other-outlet odds suggest the number may yet flip back to -3 (???). One important element to all of this is recognizing optimum price/value points. But, you already knew that....
Good luck,
TheKingfish

Purely in the name of algorithm output accuracy; a rank-change to convey:
1) California (+5)/Virginia
2) Tennessee(-2.5)/Oklahoma

This is a nuance of dealing with a rote mechanism -- like the history-based box. The algorithm actually ‘liked’ the Vols a bit more at -3. The Human Administrator deals with this on occasion. An example: where maybe a +8 dog is designated a best-bet at +7, but not at the higher number. Where, if in reverse, I’d need to wait on the larger number. If that sounds confusing, just please write it off to tech madness.....
Good luck,
TheKingfish

So these 7 games are picks from the algorithm output?

That is correct -- in the order the algorithm valued them.
Good luck,
TheKingfish