A mild winner here last Saturday (7-6, .538). Despite just two losing weeks out of six, the full-season record is nothing to write home about (39-37, .513). NG. Turning that crank on the box, and looking at each game, these float to the top: 1) Colorado(+4.5)/IowaState 2) Wisconsin(+3.5)/Iowa 3) SamHouston(+8.5)/JacksonvilleSt 4) TexasA&M(-7)/Florida 5) LSU(-8)/SouthCarolina 6) Missouri(+3.5)/Alabama 7) MichiganState(-7.5)/UCLA 8) Oregon(-7.5)/Indiana 9) USC(-2.5)/Michigan 10) OregonState(+2.5)/WakeForest 11) Washington(-10.5)/Rutgers
Through the first six weeks, the algorithm’s top two selections are performing (8-4, .667). Alas, a small sample size and maybe just that blind-pig rummaging about for his acorns.....
Hey, consistent with this slot on the forum, how about some more boring data -- to satisfy that internal-curiosity of knowing how the categories are faring in 2025? Well, over 292 FBS non-neutral site games, Home Favs are 93-89-7 (.511), and Home Dogs are 50-51-2 (.495). So, we’d all be challenged to find any strategic direction in those numbers. As we know, these percentages all go to .500 over time.
Another dollop of boring; though maybe ominous in nature. SpreadMargin (SM) is the amount a team covers by -- or fails to cover. Over the last eleven seasons (7583 games), the SM was 12.23 points. This season, SM is 11.51; a reduction of six percent. Within our current realm of understanding, and grappling-with, Artificial Intelligence, I leave every capper to worry (or not-worry) about that six (6) percent.
We have 56 on the board this week – the most weekly-opportunity thus far. Good luck, TheKingfish
A mild winner here last Saturday (7-6, .538). Despite just two losing weeks out of six, the full-season record is nothing to write home about (39-37, .513). NG. Turning that crank on the box, and looking at each game, these float to the top: 1) Colorado(+4.5)/IowaState 2) Wisconsin(+3.5)/Iowa 3) SamHouston(+8.5)/JacksonvilleSt 4) TexasA&M(-7)/Florida 5) LSU(-8)/SouthCarolina 6) Missouri(+3.5)/Alabama 7) MichiganState(-7.5)/UCLA 8) Oregon(-7.5)/Indiana 9) USC(-2.5)/Michigan 10) OregonState(+2.5)/WakeForest 11) Washington(-10.5)/Rutgers
Through the first six weeks, the algorithm’s top two selections are performing (8-4, .667). Alas, a small sample size and maybe just that blind-pig rummaging about for his acorns.....
Hey, consistent with this slot on the forum, how about some more boring data -- to satisfy that internal-curiosity of knowing how the categories are faring in 2025? Well, over 292 FBS non-neutral site games, Home Favs are 93-89-7 (.511), and Home Dogs are 50-51-2 (.495). So, we’d all be challenged to find any strategic direction in those numbers. As we know, these percentages all go to .500 over time.
Another dollop of boring; though maybe ominous in nature. SpreadMargin (SM) is the amount a team covers by -- or fails to cover. Over the last eleven seasons (7583 games), the SM was 12.23 points. This season, SM is 11.51; a reduction of six percent. Within our current realm of understanding, and grappling-with, Artificial Intelligence, I leave every capper to worry (or not-worry) about that six (6) percent.
We have 56 on the board this week – the most weekly-opportunity thus far. Good luck, TheKingfish
For the record – am adding another. 2.5) Arizona(+2)/BrighamYoung
Truth be told, I actually have three (3) more waiting in the wings. In common.......the box insists they all need a bit-more incentive (points). Good luck, TheKingfish
For the record – am adding another. 2.5) Arizona(+2)/BrighamYoung
Truth be told, I actually have three (3) more waiting in the wings. In common.......the box insists they all need a bit-more incentive (points). Good luck, TheKingfish
Adding yet another (the KSU Wildcats), and doing a coherent re-order of the list. 1) Colorado(+4.5)/IowaState 2) Wisconsin(+3.5)/Iowa 3) Arizona(+2)/BrighamYoung 4) KansasSt(+2)/TCU 5) SamHouston(+8.5)/JacksonvilleSt 6) TexasA&M(-7)/Florida 7) LSU(-8)/SouthCarolina 8) Missouri(+3.5)/Alabama 9) MichiganState(-7.5)/UCLA 10) Oregon(-7.5)/Indiana 11) USC(-2.5)/Michigan 12) OregonState(+2.5)/WakeForest 13) Washington(-10.5)/Rutgers
The algorithm also quietly likes both EasternMichigan & GeorgiaSt (in the 5.5 position), but please pencil them in for me only if each moves up to +3. Both are currently hanging at 2 to 2.5. Thank you.
Adding yet another (the KSU Wildcats), and doing a coherent re-order of the list. 1) Colorado(+4.5)/IowaState 2) Wisconsin(+3.5)/Iowa 3) Arizona(+2)/BrighamYoung 4) KansasSt(+2)/TCU 5) SamHouston(+8.5)/JacksonvilleSt 6) TexasA&M(-7)/Florida 7) LSU(-8)/SouthCarolina 8) Missouri(+3.5)/Alabama 9) MichiganState(-7.5)/UCLA 10) Oregon(-7.5)/Indiana 11) USC(-2.5)/Michigan 12) OregonState(+2.5)/WakeForest 13) Washington(-10.5)/Rutgers
The algorithm also quietly likes both EasternMichigan & GeorgiaSt (in the 5.5 position), but please pencil them in for me only if each moves up to +3. Both are currently hanging at 2 to 2.5. Thank you.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.