What's everybody think ? Frankly,this UGA grad views of as a toss up to be honest. KS record at home very strong.
@ndsent1
Have to see. O looked much better agst TN. D not so much. On our behalf, Stockton will b critical. Obviously . Much better last we, Bobo opened things up quite a bit. After he and KS sandbagged first two.
@ndsent1
Have to see. O looked much better agst TN. D not so much. On our behalf, Stockton will b critical. Obviously . Much better last we, Bobo opened things up quite a bit. After he and KS sandbagged first two.
I’m not confident in Alabama. They did and already bounced back after losing to FSU in week 1. UGA has revenge and a home game vs a line in which all they have to do is win. UGA has a poor ats history because their enormous previous performances created enormous lines. 2 teams trending badly and with Alabama showing out last 2 hood performances I’ll fade that they don’t show out on the road this game.
I’m not confident in Alabama. They did and already bounced back after losing to FSU in week 1. UGA has revenge and a home game vs a line in which all they have to do is win. UGA has a poor ats history because their enormous previous performances created enormous lines. 2 teams trending badly and with Alabama showing out last 2 hood performances I’ll fade that they don’t show out on the road this game.
Of interest, Massey has Bama w slightly higher Pwr rating and O and D rankings. Frankly,I think there is too much randomness, unpredictable variables that these models can't accurately predict.
Of interest, Massey has Bama w slightly higher Pwr rating and O and D rankings. Frankly,I think there is too much randomness, unpredictable variables that these models can't accurately predict.
So Massey, SP+, Sagarin et al ....throw them in the garbage??
Faves are 95 - 59 covering the spread when Teams play with in the TOP 136. Lines are set using these ratings mostly with some prior history and recency blended into the number
I need to see some data that ratings mean nothing..... I am actually working on that right as we speak. Stay tuned
So Massey, SP+, Sagarin et al ....throw them in the garbage??
Faves are 95 - 59 covering the spread when Teams play with in the TOP 136. Lines are set using these ratings mostly with some prior history and recency blended into the number
I need to see some data that ratings mean nothing..... I am actually working on that right as we speak. Stay tuned
This is a game you enjoy with some friends or you and some beer and fave munchies..... and play some bets in game or the total.
Buckle up, this one should be a wild one back and forth scoring as Bama has nothing to lose (since they have one loss and no respect for the Playoff) and Georgia, well, how how about Agular from the Vols basically slicing and dicing them up so easily and quickly which cannot be solved when you play another alpha again ....unless its Texas of course vs their offense
This is a game you enjoy with some friends or you and some beer and fave munchies..... and play some bets in game or the total.
Buckle up, this one should be a wild one back and forth scoring as Bama has nothing to lose (since they have one loss and no respect for the Playoff) and Georgia, well, how how about Agular from the Vols basically slicing and dicing them up so easily and quickly which cannot be solved when you play another alpha again ....unless its Texas of course vs their offense
@Last2thirst
Each to his own fella. Not the end all. LVSC never used these to set their lines. The best have ats record around 50%. Others lower. Have seen Connelly and the others be way off. Many intangibles,emotions,turnovers,etc...and officiating can't be predicted. Imo... But I'm sure you can...in your expertise and sophistication. JL.
@Last2thirst
Each to his own fella. Not the end all. LVSC never used these to set their lines. The best have ats record around 50%. Others lower. Have seen Connelly and the others be way off. Many intangibles,emotions,turnovers,etc...and officiating can't be predicted. Imo... But I'm sure you can...in your expertise and sophistication. JL.
If they r so accurate, why does 95% of the public lose money consistently wagering long-term on football ? All part of the powerful mirage as such. DA.
If they r so accurate, why does 95% of the public lose money consistently wagering long-term on football ? All part of the powerful mirage as such. DA.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.